Technical Papers
May 27, 2017

Relating Seismic Design Level and Seismic Performance: Fragility-Based Investigation of RC Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings in China

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31, Issue 5

Abstract

Analytical fragility analyses are conducted to investigate the impact of seismic design level on the seismic performance of RC moment-resisting frame buildings designed according to the provisions of the current Chinese seismic code. Four groups of buildings of low-to-mid height (3, 5, 8, and 10 stories) are studied, each of which accounts for diverse levels of seismic design, namely, precode, low code, medium code, and high code. Fragility relationships are derived for each building using nonlinear time-history analyses with 100 real ground-motion records. The results show that the buildings designed for a higher seismic code level exhibit less fragility as improving the seismic design level leads to a raised fragility median and a reduced fragility dispersion. Data on the reference seismic hazards with the probabilities of exceedance of 10 and 2–3% in 50 years show that almost all the buildings can satisfy the performance requirements of reparability and no collapse, respectively. However, the damage limitation performance objective, which is associated with 63.2% in 50-year hazard, cannot be satisfactorily achieved by medium-code and high-code buildings. The enhancement of structural resistance caused by the improvement of seismic design level is counteracted by the simultaneously increased seismic action; therefore, the limit-state probabilities of the buildings at the corresponding reference earthquakes are not decreased but increased accordingly. The current Chinese seismic design code seems conservative because the buildings show marginal potential of suffering serious damages endangering life when subjected to the seismic hazard level higher than it was designed for. Thus, it is possible to account for larger anticipated nonlinear behavior in the definition of seismic design force.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support received from National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51408155 and 51378162), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M551251), and Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Science Foundation (LBH-Z14114) are gratefully appreciated.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2008). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-08, Farmington Hills, MI.
Ancheta, T. D., et al. (2013). “PEER NGA-West2 database.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
ASCE. (2007). “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings.” ASCE/SEI41-06, Reston, VA.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for building and other structures.” ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA.
Calvi, G. M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J. J., Restrepo-Vélez, L. F., and Crowley, H. (2006). “Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years.” ISET J. Earthquake Technol., 43(3), 75–104.
Celik, O. C., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2010). “Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames—Role of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties.” Struct. Saf., 32(1), 1–12.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2003). “Design of structures for earthquake resistance. 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.” Eurocode 8, Brussels, Belgium.
Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 526–533.
Duan, H. J, and Hueste, M. B. D. (2012). “Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete frame buildings in China.” Earthquake Eng., 41, 77–89.
Dumova-Jovanoska, E. (2000). “Fragility curves for reinforced concrete structures in Skopje (Macedonia) region.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 19(6), 455–466.
Ellingwood, B. R., Celik, O. C., and Kinali, K. (2007). “Fragility assessment of building structural systems in mid-America.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1935–1952.
Erberik, M. A. (2008). “Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey.” Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1360–1374.
Erberik, M. A., and Elnashai, A. S. (2004). “Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures.” Eng. Struct., 26(7), 937–948.
Fardis, M. N., Papailia, A., and Tsionis, G. (2012). “Seismic fragility of RC framed and wall-frame buildings designed to the EN-Eurocodes.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 10(6), 1767–1793.
Howary, H. A. E., and Mehanny, S. S. F. (2011). “Seismic vulnerability evaluation of RC moment frame buildings in moderate seismic zones.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(2), 215–235.
Hueste, M. B. D., and Bai, J. W. (2007). “Seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete flat-slab structure. II: Seismic fragility analysis.” Eng. Struct., 29(6), 1178–1188.
Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C. A. (2009). “Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(8), 951–972.
Jeong, S.-H., Mwafy, A. M., and Elnashai, A. S. (2012). “Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of code-compliant multi-story RC buildings.” Eng. Struct., 34, 527–537.
Ji, J., Elnashai, A. S., and Kuchma, D. A. (2007). “Seismic fragility relationships of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build., 18(3), 259–277.
Kent, D. C., and Park, R. (1971). “Flexural members with confined concrete.” J. Struct. Div., 97(7), 1969–1990.
Kircil, M. S., and Polat, Z. (2006). “Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings.” Eng. Struct., 28(9), 1335–1345.
Kwon, O. S., and Elnashai, A. (2006). “The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure.” Eng. Struct., 28(2), 289–303.
Lee, T. H., and Mosalam, K. M. (2005). “Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM method.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(14), 1719–1736.
Lu, D. G., Yu, X. H., Jia, M. M., and Wang, G. Y. (2014). “Seismic risk assessment of a RC frame designed according to Chinese codes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 10(10), 1295–1310.
Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2005). “Comparison of incremental dynamic, cloud and stripe methods for computing probabilistic seismic demand models.” Proc., 2005 Structures Congress, Metropolis andBeyond, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–11.
Mander, J. B, Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 1804–1826.
Medina, R., and Krawinkler, H. (2003). “Seismic demands for non-deteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Menegotto, M., and Pinto, P. E. (1973). “Method of analysis of cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under normal force and bending.” Proc., Symp. on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, IABSE, Lisbon, Portugal, 15–22.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. (2010a). “Code for design of concrete structures.” GB50010-2010, China Architecture and Building, Beijing.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. (2010b). “Code for seismic design of building.” GB50011-2010, China Architecture and Building, Beijing.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. (2015). “Chinese seismic design maps.” GB18306-2015, China Architecture and Building, Beijing.
NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences). (2004). “Hazus-MH technical manual.” Chapter 5, Direct physical damage—General building stock, FEMA, Washington, DC.
OpenSees [Computer software]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Ozer, A. Y. B., and Erberik, M. A. (2008). “Vulnerability of Turkish low-rise and mid-rise reinforced concrete frame structures.” J. Earthquake Eng., 12(S2), 2–11.
Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty.” J. Struct. Eng., 1710–1718.
Panagiotakos, T. B., and Fardis, M. N. (2001). “Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate.” Struct. J., 98(2), 135–148.
Ramamoorthy, S. K., Gardoni, P., and Bracci, J. M. (2006). “Probabilistic demand models and fragility curves for reinforced concrete frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 1563–1572.
Ramamoorthy, S. K., Gardoni, P., and Bracci, J. M. (2008). “Seismic fragility and confidence bounds for gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames of varying height.” J. Struct. Eng., 639–650.
Rossetto, T., and Elnashai, A. S. (2003). “Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data.” Eng. Struct., 25(10), 1241–1263.
Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). “Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements.” ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 244–252.
Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. E. (1998). “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthquake Spectra., 14(3), 469–500.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491–514.
Wen, Y. K., Ellingwood, B. R., and Bracci, J. M. (2004). “Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering.”, Mid-America Earthquake Center (MAE), Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
Wu, D., Tesfamarism, S., Stiemer, S. F., and Qin, D. (2012). “Seismic fragility assessment of RC frame structure designed according to modern Chinese code for seismic design of buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr., 11(3), 331–342.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31Issue 5October 2017

History

Received: Oct 6, 2015
Accepted: Feb 28, 2017
Published online: May 27, 2017
Published in print: Oct 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 27, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiao-Hui Yu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang Sheng 150001, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Da-Gang Lu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang Sheng 150001, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Bing Li, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore, Singapore 639798 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share