Technical Papers
Feb 26, 2017

Seismic Performance Assessment of Isolated Low-Rise Steel Structures Based on Loss Estimation

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31, Issue 4

Abstract

Base isolation (BI) has proven to be an effective method to decrease the seismic vibration and mitigating seismic risks; however, construction cost of the BI buildings is expected to be increased compared with the conventional buildings due to the technology required by the BI system. Consequently, it is essential to examine if the increased construction cost of the BI system would be balanced by the reduced seismic losses throughout the life span of the building. Cost-benefit analysis can specify the economic feasibility of BI buildings with regard to conventional buildings based on loss estimation. Loss estimation procedures consider repair costs, injuries and fatalities, downtime and its consequences in seismic events; and cost-benefit analyses considering discount rates are used to assess seismic performance of isolated low-rise steel structures. It was shown that the increased construction cost of these structures can be repaid within 7–41 years. The analysis results show that seismic isolation decreases the collapse probability in superstructures significantly and can be economical in reducing seismic risk of the low-rise steel structures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AISC. (2010). “Specification for structural steel buildings.”, Chicago.
Alhamaydeh, M. H., Barakat, S. A., and Abed, F. H. (2013). “Multiple regression modeling of natural rubber seismic-isolation systems with supplemental viscous damping for near-field ground motion.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 19(5), 665–682.
Al-Shawwa, N., and Lignos, D. (2015). “Web-based interactive tools for performance-based earthquake engineering.” ⟨http://dimitrios-lignos.research.mcgill.ca/databases/index.php⟩ (Mar. 10, 2015).
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.”, Reston, VA.
Baker, J. W. (2007). “Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1861–1883.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2008). “Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation.” Struct. Saf., 30(3), 236–252.
Banazadeh, M., Gholhaki, M., and Parvini Sani, H. (2016). “Cost-benefit analysis of seismic-isolated structures with viscous damper based on loss estimation.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., in press.
Bozorgnia, Y., and Bertero, V. V. (2004). Earthquake engineering: From engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, CRC press, Boca Raton, FL.
Bradley, B. A. (2009). “Structure-specific probabilistic seismic risk assessment.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Cha, E. J., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2013). “Attitudes towards acceptance of risk to buildings from extreme winds.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 10(6), 697–707.
Das, S., Gur, S., Mishra, S. K., and Chakraborty, S. (2014). “Optimal performance of base isolated building considering limitation on excessive isolator displacement.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 11(7), 904–917.
DOT (U.S. Department of Transportation). (2013). “Treatment of the value of preventing fatalities and injuries in preparing economic analyses.” ⟨https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/VSL%20Guidance_2013.pdf⟩ (Sep. 2, 2014).
Dyanati, M., Huang, Q., and Roke, D. (2016). “Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., in press.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Wen, Y. K. (2005). “Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low-probability/high consequence earthquake events in Mid-America.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 7(2), 56–70.
Erberik, M. A., and Elnashai, A. S. (2006). “Loss estimation analysis of flat-slab structures.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 26–37.
Erduran, E., Dao, N. D., and Ryan, K. L. (2011). “Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise conventional and base-isolated steel frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(10), 1123–1141.
ETABS [Computer software]. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA.
FEMA. (2007). “Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and non-structural components.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2009). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012). “Seismic performance assessment of buildings. Volume 1—Methodology.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2014). “Technical manual: Earthquake model.”, Washington, DC.
Goda, K., Lee, C. S., and Hong, H. P. (2010). “Lifecycle cost-benefit analysis of isolated buildings.” Struct. Saf., 32(1), 52–63.
Kazantzi, A. K., Vamvatsikos, D., and Lignos, D. G. (2014). “Seismic performance of a steel moment-resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty.” Eng. Struct., 78, 69–77.
Krawinkler, H., Zareian, F., Medina, R. A., and Ibarra, L. F. (2006). “Decision support for conceptual performance-based design.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(1), 115–133.
Kumar, M., Whittaker, A. S., and Constantinou, M. C. (2014). “An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(13), 1955–1974.
Lee, H.-P., Kim, S., Cho, M.-S., and Ji, Y.-S. (2014). “Application of sliding seismic isolator to building structures considering cost, performance and inspection: A case study.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 11(7), 851–868.
Liel, A. B. (2008). Assessing the collapse risk of California’s existing reinforced concrete frame structures: Metrics for seismic safety decisions, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Lignos, D., and Krawinkler, H. (2011). “Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 1291–1302.
Mitrani-Reiser, J. (2007). “An ounce of prevention: Probabilistic loss estimation for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Ph.D. dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
Molina Hutt, C., Almufti, I., Willford, M., and Deierlein, G. (2015). “Seismic loss and downtime assessment of existing tall steel-framed buildings and strategies for increased resilience.” J. Struct. Eng., .
Morgan, T. A., and Mahin, S. A. (2011). “The use of base isolation systems to achieve complex seismic performance objectives.”, Berkeley Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Naeim, F., and Kelly, J. M. (1999). Design of seismic isolated structures: From theory to practice, Wiley, New York.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget). (2015). “OMB circular No. A-94: Discount rates for cost-effectiveness, lease purchase, and related analyses.” ⟨https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a094/a94_appx-c⟩ (Aug. 10, 2015).
OpenSees [Computer software]. PEER, Berkeley, CA.
PACT version 2 [Computer software]. GitHub, Inc., San Francisco.
Padgett, J. E., Dennemann, K., and Ghosh, J. (2010). “Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment.” Struct. Saf., 32(3), 165–173.
Parvini Sani, H., and Banazadeh, M. (2012). “Decision analysis for seismic retrofit based on loss estimation.” Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica (SPES), 4, Lisboa, Portugal, 2467–2474.
RS Means. (2015). “RS means facilities maintenance and repair cost data online. ⟨https://www.rsmeans.com⟩ (Mar. 17, 2015).
Ryan, K. L., and Polanco, J. (2008). “Problems with rayleigh damping in base-isolated structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1780–1784.
Sayani, P., Erduran, E., and Ryan, K. (2011). “Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low-rise base-isolated and conventional steel moment-resisting frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng., 1118–1131.
Shokrabadi, M., Banazadeh, M., Shokrabadi, M., and Mellati, A. (2015). “Assessment of seismic risks in code conforming reinforced concrete frames.” Eng. Struct., 98, 14–28.
Shome, N., Jayaram, N., and Rahnama, M. (2013). “Development of earthquake vulnerability functions for tall buildings.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, International Association for Structural Safety and Reliability, New York.
Un, E. M., Erberik, M. A., and Aksan, A. (2015). “Performance assessment of Turkish residential buildings for seismic damage and loss estimation.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., .
USGS. (2015). “Hazard Curve Application.” ⟨http://geohazards.usgs.gov/hazardtool/application.php⟩ (Feb. 8, 2014).
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491–514.
Williams, R. J., Gardoni, P., and Bracci, J. M. (2009). “Decision analysis for seismic retrofit of structures.” Struct. Saf., 31(2), 188–196.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31Issue 4August 2017

History

Received: May 20, 2016
Accepted: Dec 9, 2016
Published ahead of print: Feb 26, 2017
Published online: Feb 27, 2017
Discussion open until: Jul 27, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Structural Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Semnan Univ., University sq., 35131-19111 Semnan, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4312-7250. E-mail: [email protected]
Majid Gholhaki [email protected]
Associate Professor, Structural Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Semnan Univ., University Sq., 35131-19111 Semnan, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
Mehdi Banazadeh [email protected]
Associate Professor, Seismic Engineering, No. 510, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir Univ. of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), 424 Hafez Ave., P.O. Box 19468-15914, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share