Technical Papers
Jul 12, 2016

Performance Assessment of Two Aseismically Designed RC School Buildings after the October 23, 2011, Van, Turkey Earthquake

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31, Issue 1

Abstract

In many design codes, school buildings are classified as important structures. Hence, they are designed to withstand earthquakes with or without minor structural damage. This study examines the seismic performance of two aseismically designed regular reinforced concrete school buildings in Van, Turkey, after the October 23, 2011, earthquake. First, the results of reconnaissance studies regarding the seismic response of the school buildings are presented. These studies indicate that the selected buildings were moderately damaged. Three-dimensional analytical models of the buildings are developed to clarify their seismic response. The capacity values of the structures are calculated using the N2 nonlinear static procedure (where N stands for nonlinear analysis and 2 for two mathematical models). Afterwards, seismic performance of the selected buildings is assessed applying the procedures according to the latest design code. Nonlinear dynamic time history analyses are then carried out using data from the Muradiye monitoring station. The reasons of the observed damage are discussed. Further, recommendations are made to improve the seismic performance of aseismically designed reinforced concrete school buildings. The construction quality and detailing of the reinforcement are the major issues affecting the performance of school buildings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the administrative support of Istanbul Technical University and the contributions of various academics in reconnaissance studies are highly appreciated.

References

Abrahamson, N., et al. (2008). “Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 45–66.
Abrahamson, N., and Silva, W. (2008). “Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 67–97.
Adhikari, G., and Pinho, R. (2010). “Development and application of nonlinear static procedures for plan-asymmetric buildings.”, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
AFAD (Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Authority). (2011). “Report on Van earthquake eastern Turkey (M1=6.7, Mw=7.0).” Emergency Management Presidency, Ankara, Turkey.
AFAD (Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Authority). (2014). “Response, rehabilitation and socioeconomic aspects of 2011 Van earthquakes.” 〈https://www.afad.gov.tr/Dokuman/TR/78-20140529153416-mudahale,-iyilestirme-ve-sosyoekonomik-acidan-2011-van-depremi-raporu.pdf/〉 (Jun. 25, 2015).
Akkar, S., and Bommer, J. J. (2006). “Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1145–1165.
Akkar, S., Kale, O., Yenier, E., and Bommer, J. J. (2011). “The high-frequency limit of usable response spectral ordinates from filtered analogue and digital strong-motion accelerograms.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(12), 1387–1401.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). (2010). “Applicability of nonlinear multiple-degree-of-freedom modeling for design.” ATC-76-6, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Redwood City, CA.
Aydan, Ö., Ulusay, R., and Kumsar, H. (2012). “Site investigation and engineering evaluation of the Van earthquakes of October 23 and November 9, 2011.”, Turkish Earthquake Found, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aydan, Ö., Ulusay, R., and Kumsar, H. (2014). “Seismic, ground motion and geotechnical characteristics of the 2011 Van-Erciş and Van-Edremit earthquakes of Turkey, and assessment of geotechnical damages.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 73(2), 643–666.
Bhatt, C., and Bento, R. (2011a). “Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 9(4), 1183–1201.
Bhatt, C., and Bento, R. (2011b). “Extension of the CSM-FEMA440 to plan-asymmetric real building structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(11), 1263–1282.
Bhatt, C., and Bento, R. (2014). “The extended adaptive capacity spectrum method for the seismic assessment of plan-asymmetric buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 30(2), 683–703.
Boore, D. M., and Atkinson, G. M. (2008). “Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01s and 10.0s.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 99–138.
Boore, D. M., and Bommer, J. J. (2005). “Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: Needs, options and consequences.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 25(2), 93–115.
Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y. (2008). “NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 139–171.
Carvalho, G., Bento, R., and Bhatt, C. (2013). “Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of reinforced concrete buildings—Comparison of different modelling approaches.” Earthquakes Struct., 4(5), 451–470.
CEDIM (Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology). (2011). “Comparing the current impact of the Van earthquake to past earthquakes in Eastern Turkey (Report #4).” 〈http://www.cedim.de/〉 (Jun. 25, 2015).
Celebi, E., et al. (2013). “October 23, 2011 Turkey/Van-Ercis earthquake: Structural damages in residential buildings.” Nat. Hazards, 65(3), 2287–2310.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2006). “Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules. Specifi c rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.” Eurocode 8, Brussels, Belgium.
Chiou, B. S.-J., and Youngs, R. R. (2008). “An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 173–215.
Cimellaro, G. P., Giovine, T., and Lopez-Garcia, D. (2014). “Bidirectional pushover analysis of irregular structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014059.
da Porto, F., Mosele, F., and Modena, C. (2011). “Cyclic out-of-plane behavior of tall reinforced masonry walls under p-Δ effects.” Eng. Struct., 33(2), 287–297.
Di Sarno, L., Yenidogan, C., and Erdik, M. (2013). “Field evidence and numerical investigation of the Mw=7.1 October 23 Van, Tabanlı and the Mw>5.7 November earthquakes of 2011.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 11(1), 313–346.
Eljadei, A. A., and Harries, K. A. (2014). “Design of coupled wall structures as evolving structural systems.” Eng. Struct., 73, 100–113.
Elnashai, A. S. (2001). “Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications.” Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(1), 51–69.
EMS (European Macroseismic Scale). (1998). “EMS-98. Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie.” rue Münster, Luxembourg (in French).
ETABS version 15.2.0 [Computer software]. Computers and Structures, Inc., CA.
Fajfar, P., and Gaspersic, P. (1996). “The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(1), 31–46.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (1997). “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 273, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2000). “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 356, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2005). “Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures.” Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project), FEMA 440, Redwood City, CA.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2009). “NEHRP (national earthquake hazards reduction program) recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures.” FEMA P-750, Building Seismic Safety Council of the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC.
Fragiadakis, M., Vamvatsikos, D., and Aschheim, M. (2014). “Application of nonlinear static procedures for the seismic assessment of regular RC moment frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 30(2), 767–794.
Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. K. (2004). “Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(1), 225–254.
Guo, T., Xu, W., Song, L., and Wei, L. (2014). “Seismic-isolation retrofits of school buildings: Practice in China after recent devastating earthquakes.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 96–107.
Gupta, B., and Kunnath, S. K. (2000). “Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures.” Earthquake Spectra, 16(2), 367–392.
Idriss, I. M. (2008). “An NGA empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 217–242.
Inci, P., Goksu, C., Ilki, A., and Kumbasar, N. (2013). “Effects of reinforcement corrosion on the performance of RC frame buildings subjected to seismic actions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 683–696.
Irfanoglu, A. (2009). “Performance of template school buildings during earthquakes in Turkey and Peru.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 5–14.
Katsanos, E. I., Sextos, A. G., and Elnashai, A. S. (2014). “Prediction of inelastic response periods of buildings based on intensity measures and analytical model parameters.” Eng. Struct., 71, 161–177.
Khoshnoudian, F., Kiani, M., and Yang, T. Y (2013). “A new pushover procedure for two-way asymmetric-plan tall buildings under bidirectional earthquakes.” Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build., 23(14), 1097–1117.
Konagai, K., Ulusay, R., Kumsar, H., Aydan, O., and Celebi, M. (2012). “The characteristics of seismic, strong motion and structural damage of the 2011 Van-Ercis earthquake.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA, 1902–1913.
Kreslin, M., and Fajfar, P. (2011). “The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(14), 1571–1589.
Kreslin, M., and Fajfar, P. (2012a). “Seismic evaluation of an existing complex RC building.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 8(2), 363–385.
Kreslin, M., and Fajfar, P. (2012b). “The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 10(2), 695–715.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 1804–1826.
Meireles, H., Bento, R., Cattari, S., and Lagomarsino, S. (2014). “Seismic assessment and retrofitting of Pombalino buildings by pushover analyses.” Earthquakes Struct., 7(1), 57–82.
Oyguc, R. (2016). “Seismic performance of RC school buildings after 2011 Van earthquakes.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 14(3), 821–847.
Pinho, R., Marques, M., Monteiro, R., Casarotti, C., and Delgado, R. (2013). “Evaluation of nonlinear static procedures in the assessment of building frames.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(4), 1459–1476.
Poursha, M., Khoshnoudian, F., and Moghadam, A. S. (2014). “The extended consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of two-way unsymmetric-plan tall buildings under influence of two horizontal components of ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 63, 162–173.
Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., and Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement based seismic design of structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
Reyes, J. C., and Chopra, A. K. (2011). “Three-dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(7), 789–806.
Stern, R. J., and Johnson, P. (2010). “Continental lithosphere of the Arabian plate: A geologic, petrologic, and geophysical synthesis.” Earth-Sci. Rev., 101(1-2), 29–67.
Strong Ground Motion Database of Turkey. (2016). “TR-KYH.” 〈http://kyhdata.deprem.gov.tr/2K/kyhdata_v4.php〉 (Dec. 12, 2011).
Tapan, M., Comert, M., Demir, C., Sayan, Y., Orakcal, K., and Ilki, A. (2013). “Failures of structures during the October 23, 2011 Tabanlı (Van) and November 9, 2011 Edremit (Van) earthquakes in Turkey.” Eng. Fail. Anal., 34, 606–628.
TEC (Turkish Earthquake Code). (1975). “Regulations on structures constructed in disaster regions.” TEC 1975, Ministry Of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.
TEC (Turkish Earthquake Code). (2007). “Regulations on structures constructed in disaster regions.” TEC 2007, Ministry Of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.
TSI (Turkish Standards Institute). (2000). “Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures.” TS500, Ankara, Turkey.
XTRACT 3.0.8 [Computer software]. TRC, Rancho Cordova, CA.
Yu-Fu, K., and Co, P. (2014). “Nonlinear static cyclic pushover analysis for flexural failure of reinforced concrete bridge columns with combined damage mechanisms.” Acta Mechanica, 225(2), 477–492.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31Issue 1February 2017

History

Received: Aug 3, 2015
Accepted: Apr 29, 2016
Published online: Jul 12, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 12, 2016
Published in print: Feb 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Resat Oyguc, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Management, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Evrim Guley
Ph.D. Candidate, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Management, Istanbul Technical Univ., Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share