Technical Papers
Jun 25, 2015

Comparison of Visual Inspection and Structural-Health Monitoring As Bridge Condition Assessment Methods

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a research project aimed at examining the capabilities and challenges of two distinct but not mutually exclusive approaches to in-service bridge assessment: visual inspection and installed monitoring systems. In this study, the intended functionality of both approaches was evaluated on its ability to identify potential structural damage and to provide decision-making support. Inspection and monitoring are compared in terms of their functional performance, cost, and barriers (real and perceived) to implementation. Both methods have strengths and weaknesses across the metrics analyzed, and it is likely that a hybrid evaluation technique that adopts both approaches will optimize efficiency of condition assessment and ultimately lead to better decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of numerous FDOT personnel in constructing the arguments presented here. The opinions presented here are those of the authors and do not reflect those of FDOT or its employees.

References

Agdas, D., and Ellis, R. (2010). “The potential of XML technology as an answer to the data interchange problems of the construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 28(7), 737–746.
Alampalli, S., and Ettouney, M. (2008). “Role of structural health monitoring in bridge security.” Bridge Struct. Assess. Des. Constr., 4(3–4), 143–154.
ASCE. (2013). “Report card for America’s infrastructure.” 〈http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/〉 (Jun. 2014).
Brownjohn, J. M. W. (2007). “Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365(1851), 589–622.
Chan, T. H., et al. (2009). “Vertical displacement measurements for bridges using optical fiber sensors and CCD cameras: A preliminary study.” Struct. Health Monit., 8(3), 243–249.
Cosser, E., Roberts, G. W., Meng, X., and Dodson, A. H. (2004). “The comparison of single frequency and dual frequency GPS for bridge deflection and vibration monitoring.” Proc., Deformation Measurements and Analysis, 11th Int. Symp. on Deformation Measurements, Int. Federation of Surveyors (FIG), Federation Internationale des Geometres (FIG), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dickens, T. J., Olawale, D., Sullivan, G., Breaux, J., Okoli, O. O., and Wang, B. (2011). “Toward triboluminescent sensor realization for SHM: Statistical modeling of triboluminescent composites.” SPIE 7981: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2011, SPIE, M. Tomizuka, ed., Bellingham, WA, 79810J–79810J.
Egan, M. (2007). “Anticipating future vulnerability: Defining characteristics of increasingly critical infrastructure-like systems.” J. Contingencies Crisis Manage., 15(1), 4–17.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2004). “National bridge inspection standards. 23 cfr part 650.” Fed. Regist., 69(239), 74419–74439.
Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K. Y., and Estes, A. C. (1997). “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1390–1401.
Guan, S., Rice, J., Li, C., and Wang, G. (2014). “Bridge deflection monitoring using small, low-cost radar sensors.” Structures Congress 2014, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Guan, S., Rice, J. A., Li, C., Li, Y., and Wang, G. (2015). “Dynamic and static structural displacement measurement using backscattering dc coupled radar.” Smart Struct. Syst., in press.
Harada, T., and Yokoyama, K. (2007). “Optimization of maintenance strategies for road pavement by considering flexibility of alternatives.” Life-cycle cost and performance of civil infrastructure systems, H. N. Cho, D. M. Frangopol, and A. H. S. Ang, eds., Taylor and Francis, Hoboken, NJ.
Hartmann, T., and Fischer, M. (2009). “A process view on end-user resistance during construction IT implementations.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 14, 353–365.
Holguín-Veras, J., Pérez, N., Ukkusuri, S., Wachtendorf, T., and Brown, B. (2007). “Emergency logistics issues affecting the response to Katrina: A synthesis and preliminary suggestions for improvement.” Transportation Research Record, 2022, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 76–82.
IBRD (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development). (2010). “Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: The economics of effective prevention.” 〈http://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr.org/files/nhud/files/NHUD-Report_Full.pdf〉 (Dec. 10, 2012).
Inaudi, D., et al. (2009). “Structural health monitoring system for the new I-35 W St Anthony Falls Bridge.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, Smartec, Manno, Switzerland, 2–10.
Jang, S., et al. (2010). “Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: Deployment and evaluation.” Smart Struct. Syst., 6(5–6), 439–459.
Kim, S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Cost-effective lifetime structural health monitoring based on availability.” J. Struct. Eng., 22–33.
Ko, J. M., and Ni, Y. Q. (2005). “Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges.” Eng. Struct., 27(12), 1715–1725.
Kurata, M., et al. (2012). “Internet-enabled wireless structural monitoring systems: Development and permanent deployment at the new Carquinez suspension bridge.” J. Struct. Eng., 1688–1702.
Li, H. N., Li, D. S., and Song, G. B. (2004). “Recent applications of fiber optic sensors to health monitoring in civil engineering.” Eng. Struct., 26(11), 1647–1657.
López-Higuera, J. M., Rodriguez Cobo, L., Quintela Incera, A., and Cobo, A. (2011). “Fiber optic sensors in structural health monitoring.” J. Lightwave Technol., 29(4), 587–608.
Moore, M., Phares, B., Graybeal, B., Rolander, D., and Washer, G. (2001). “Reliability of visual inspection for highway bridges.”, Vol. 1, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). (2008). “Collapse of I-35 W highway bridge, Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 1, 2007.” 〈http://www.dot.state.mn.us/i35wbridge/ntsb/finalreport.pdf〉 (Dec. 10, 2012).
Page, C., and Sergi, G. (2000). “Developments in Cathodic protection applied to reinforced concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 8–15.
Prevatt, D., et al. (2012). “Making the case for improved structural design: Tornado outbreaks of 2011.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng., 254–270.
Rice, J. A, et al. (2010a). “Flexible smart sensor framework for autonomous structural health monitoring.” Smart Struct. Syst., 6(5–6), 423–438.
Rice, J. A., Mechitov, K. A., Sim, S. H., Spencer, B. F., Jr., and Agha, G. (2010b). “Enabling framework for structural health monitoring using smart sensors.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 18(5), 574–587.
Rossi, G., Marsili, R., Gusella, V., and Gioffre, M. (2002). “Comparison between accelerometer and laser vibrometer to measure traffic excited vibrations on bridges.” Shock and Vibr., 9(1), 11–18.
U.S. Census. (2014). “U.S. Census Bureau news.” 〈https://www.census.gov/construction/c30/prpdf.html〉 (Jul. 2014).
Wardhana, K., and Hadipriono, F. (2003). “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 144–150.
Webb, G., Vardanega, P., and Middleton, C. (2014). “Categories of SHM deployments: Technologies and capabilities.” J. Bridge Eng., 04014118.
Wong, K. (2007). “Design of a structural health monitoring system for long-span bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. Maintenance Manage. Life-Cycle Des. Perform., 3(2), 169–185.
Yi, X., Wu, T., Wang, Y., Leon, R. T., Tentzeris, M. M., and Lantz, G. (2011). “Passive wireless smart-skin sensor using RFID-based folded patch antennas.” Int. J. Smart Nano Mater., 2(1), 22–38.
Zhu, S., Levinson, D., Liu, H. X., and Harder, K. (2010). “The traffic and behavioral effects of the I-35 W Mississippi River bridge collapse.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 44(10), 771–784.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30Issue 3June 2016

History

Received: Aug 21, 2014
Accepted: May 14, 2015
Published online: Jun 25, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 25, 2015
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Duzgun Agdas, M.ASCE [email protected]
Lecturer, Civil Engineering and Built Environment School, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jennifer A. Rice, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Engineering, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. E-mail: [email protected]
Justin R. Martinez [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Engineering, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. E-mail: [email protected]
Ivan R. Lasa [email protected]
State Corrosion Mitigation Technologist, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Gainesville, FL 32609. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share