Technical Papers
Jun 9, 2015

BEEST-EB Energy-Rating Method for Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Existing Buildings

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 3

Abstract

Current sustainable building rating systems typically rate the energy performance of existing buildings by assessing how efficiently they consume energy, relative to similar buildings nationwide. In these rating systems, building type and external benchmark are the two notions typically employed. Alternatively, this study explores the notions of space type and internal benchmark and develops the benchmarking energy efficiency by space type for existing buildings (BEEST-EB) method to assess the energy efficiency of existing buildings. Specifically, core research concepts such as space type, standard operation settings, standard energy consumption, operational effectiveness index, and energy efficiency score are adopted in the BEEST-EB method. An existing building usually consists of different space types, each featuring similar operational characteristics and energy demands. It is therefore proposed that, for each space type, its standard operation settings should be defined and its standard energy consumption should be estimated with energy prediction models such as eQuest, accounting for the energy effects of additional factors such as existing climate and building infrastructure characteristics. The standard energy consumption of a building, revealing the performance of its building infrastructure while operating under standard settings, is regarded as its reasonable internal energy benchmark. The operational effectiveness index of a building is further assessed by calculating the ratio of its actual energy consumption to its standard energy consumption, and used to indicate how effectively the building is operated and managed. Finally, the energy efficiency of a building is evaluated by assessing both its standard energy consumption and operational effectiveness index jointly. Only buildings having high building infrastructure performance and high operational effectiveness simultaneously are rated as highly energy efficient buildings. The Department of Architecture of the national university NTUST in Taiwan is used as a case to demonstrate how the BEEST-EB method is employed to rate its energy efficiency and used as an effective energy management tool.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the National Science Council of the Executive Yuan of Taiwan for sponsoring this research work (Project No. NSC 99-2221-E-011-086).

References

Abdullah, A., Cross, B., and Aksamija, A. (2014). “Whole building energy analysis: A comparative study of different simulation tools and applications in architectural design.” Proc., 2014 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Washington, DC, 11-1–11-12.
Attia, S., Beltran, L., De Herde, A., and Hensen, J. L. M. (2009). “Architect friendly: A comparison of ten different building performance simulation tools.” Proc., 11th IBPSA Building Simulation Conf., International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA), Canada, 204–211.
Ballarini, I., and Corrado, V. (2009). “Application of energy rating methods to the existing building stock: Analysis of some residential buildings in Turin.” Energy Build., 41(7), 790–800.
Borgstein, E. H., and Lamberts, R. (2014). “Developing energy consumption benchmarks for buildings: Bank branches in Brazil.” Energy Build., 82, 82–91.
BRE (Building Research Establishment). (2011). “BRE environmental and sustainability standard: BREAM-in-use.” Watford, U.K.
CEN. (2008). “Energy performance of buildings—Overall energy use and definition of energy ratings.”, European Committee for Standardization.
Chung, W., Hui, T. V., and Lam, Y. M. (2006). “Benchmarking the energy efficiency of commercial buildings.” Appl. Energy, 83(1), 1–14.
Cole, R. J. (1999). “Building environmental assessment methods: Clarifying intentions.” Build. Res. Inf., 27(4), 230–246.
Deng, S. M., and Burnett, J. (2006). “A study of energy performance of hotel buildings in Hong Kong.” Energy Build., 31(1), 7–12.
Design Builder V.4 [Computer software]. Stroud, Gloucestershire, DesignBuilder Software.
Ding, G. K. C. (2008). “Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools.” J. Environ. Manage., 86(3), 451–464.
DOE-2 V.2 [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Ecotect V. 1.0 [Computer software]. Cardiff, Wales, U.K., Centre for Research in the Built Environment.
EnergyPlus V. 8.2 [Computer software]. Washington, DC, U.S. Dept. of Energy.
eQuest V. 3.64 [Computer software]. Camarillo, CA, James J. Hirsch and Associates.
Federspiel, C., Zhang, Q., and Arens, E. (2000). “Model-based benchmarking with application to laboratory buildings.” Energy Build., 34(3), 203–214.
Forsberg, A., and von Malmborg, F. (2004). “Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment.” Build. Environ., 39(2), 223–228.
Gao, X., and Malkawi, A. (2014). “A new methodology for building energy performance benchmarking: An approach based on intelligent clustering algorithm.” Energy Build., 84, 607–616.
Gul, M. S., and Patidar, S. (2015). “Understanding the energy consumption and occupancy of a multi-purpose academic building.” Energy Build., 87, 155–165.
Haapio, A., and Viitaniemi, P. (2008). “A critical review of building environmental assessment tools.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 28(7), 469–482.
Haji-Sapar, M., and Lee, S. E. (2005). “Establishment of energy management tools for facilities managers in the tropical region.” Facilities, 23(9/10), 416–425.
Lee, W. L., Yik, F. W. H., and Burnett, J. (2007). “Assessing energy performance in the latest versions of Hong Kong building environmental assessment method (HK-BEAM).” Energy Build., 39(3), 343–354.
Newsham, G. R., Mancini, S. and Birt, B. J. (2009). “Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but…” Energy Build., 41(8), 897–905.
Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., González, R., and Maestre, I. R. (2009). “A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes.” Energy Build., 41(3), 272–278.
Poel, B., van Cruchten, G., and Balaras, C. A. (2007). “Energy performance assessment of existing dwellings.” Energy Build., 39(4), 393–403.
Rallapalli, H. S. (2010). “A comparison of EnergyPlus and eQUEST whole building energy simulation results for a medium sized office building.” M.S. thesis, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.
Sinou, M., and Kyvelou, S. (2006). “Present and future of building performance assessment tools.” Manage. Environ. Qual., 17(5), 570–586.
Tu, K. J., Lai, J. F., and Lin, C. H. (2010). “Strategies and critical issues of building energy management on university campus: Case study of NTUST.” J. Prop. Manage., 1(1), 55–64.
U.S. Green Building Council. (2009). “LEED 2009 for existing buildings operations and maintenance rating system.” USGBC, Washington, DC.
Wang, S., Yan, C., and Xiao, F. (2012). “Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings.” Energy Build., 55, 873–888.
Yoshino, H. (2013). “Total energy use in buildings: Analysis and evaluation methods.”, Executive Committee Support Services Unit, Birmingham, U.K.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30Issue 3June 2016

History

Received: Sep 15, 2014
Accepted: Apr 14, 2015
Published online: Jun 9, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 9, 2015
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kung-Jen Tu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, National Taiwan Univ. of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share