Technical Papers
Sep 11, 2015

Simplified Framework for Blast-Risk-Based Cost-Benefit Analysis for Reinforced Concrete-Block Buildings

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 4

Abstract

Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is essential for evaluating different options for blast risk management. However, depending on the risk management approach being considered, a rigorous blast PRA study can be quite demanding. To expedite this process, a simplified PRA framework is proposed for reinforced concrete-block shear wall buildings, in order to determine design basis threat (DBT) fragility curves based on revised damage limit states most suitable for risk assessment. The current definitions of damage states by North American standards for blast resistant design involve global response limits—such as the support rotations of a structural element—that are relatively simple to calculate. However, such damage state descriptors can be insufficient for the cost-benefit analysis required to evaluate different risk mitigation options. As such, building on recent advances in the area of performance-based seismic design of concrete-block shear wall buildings, this study proposes revised damage states that can be associated with more useful metrics, including repair technique and building downtime. To illustrate the proposed methodology, a hypothetical shear wall building is analyzed under different DBT levels. The DBT fragility curves are obtained through Monte Carlo sampling of the random variables describing the shear wall system and are used to identify the locations that are most suitable for the erection of barriers for blast protection. The proposed PRA framework can be used to identify target performance requirements, formulated in terms of stakeholders’ tolerable probability of failure and consequent risk management, for different classes of buildings under a range of DBTs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was facilitated by a Collaborative Research and Development Grant (CRDG), funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC); the Canadian Concrete Masonry Producers Association (CCMPA); and the Canada Masonry Design Centre (CMDC). Additional funding was provided by McMaster University Centre for Effective Design of Structures (CEDS), funded through the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund (ORDCF) of the Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI). The authors are very grateful to the staff of the Canadian Explosives Research Laboratory (CERL) who conducted the field tests and to the Canadian Forces for granting access to the test range.

References

Abou-Zeid, B. M., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Razaqpur, A. G., and Foo, S. (2011a). “Modeling the nonlinear behavior of concrete masonry walls retrofitted with steel studs under blast loading.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 411–421.
Abou-Zeid, B. M., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Razaqpur, A. G., and Foo, S. (2011b). “Performance of unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted with externally-anchored steel studs under blast loading.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 441–453.
Abou-Zeid, B. M., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Razaqpur, A. G., and Foo, S. (2011c). “Response of arching unreinforced concrete masonry walls to blast loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 1205–1214.
Abou-Zeid, B. M., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Razaqpur, A. G., and Foo, S. (2014). “Time-response analysis of arching unreinforced concrete block walls subjected to blast loads.” J. Struct. Eng., 04013099-1-14.
Ang, A. H.-S., and Tang, W. H. (1975). “Probability concepts in engineering planning and design.” Basic principles, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York.
ASCE. (2011). “Blast protection of buildings.” ASCE/SEI 59-11, Reston, VA.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard test methods for compressive strength of masonry prisms.” ASTM C1314-11a, West Conshohocken, PA.
Biggs, J. M. (1964). Introduction to structural dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bishop, C. D., and McInerney, E. H. (2014). “Disproportionate collapse design considerations—A comprehensive approach.” ASCE Structures Congress: 2221-2232, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Bogosian, D., Ferritto, J., and Shi, Y. (2002). “Measuring uncertainty and conservatism in simplified blast models.” 30th Explosive Safety Seminar, Dept. of Defense, Explosives Safety Board, Alexandria, VA.
Browning, R., Dinan, R., and Davidson, J. (2014). “Blast resistance of fully grouted reinforced concrete masonry veneer walls.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 228–241.
Campidelli, M., Razaqpur, A. G., and Foo, S. (2013). “Reliability-based load factors for blast design.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 40(5), 461–474.
Campidelli, M., Tait, M. J., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., and Mekky, W. (2015). “Inference of blast wavefront parameter uncertainty for probabilistic risk assessment.” J. Struct. Eng., 04015062.
Carney, P., and Myers, J. J. (2003). “Out–of–plane static and blast resistance of unreinforced masonry wall connections strengthened with fiber reinforced polymers.”, Center for Infrastructure Engineering Studies, Univ. of Missouri, Rolla, MO.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2004). “Design of masonry structures.” CAN/CSA S304-04, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2012). “Design and assessment of buildings subjected to blast loads.” CSA standard S850-12, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Changiz Rezaei, S. H., Mekky, W. F., and Razaqpur, A. G. (2009). “Response sensitivity to blast-loaded reinforced concrete structures to the number of degrees of freedom.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(8), 1305–1320.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2006). “Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 315–323.
ElSayed, M., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., and Tait, M. J. (2015a). “Response evaluation of reinforced concrete block structural walls subjected to blast loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 04015043.
ElSayed, M., Tait, M. J., and El-Dakhakhni, W. W. (2015b). “Resilience evaluation of seismically detailed reinforced concrete-block shear walls for blast risk assessment.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., in press.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (1998). “Repair of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2003). “Premier to design safe school projects in case of terrorist attacks.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2009). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012a). “Damage states and fragility curves for low aspect ratio reinforced concrete walls.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012b). “Damage states and fragility curves for reinforced masonry shear walls.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012c). “Fragility curves for slab-column connections.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012d). “Fragility functions for reinforced concrete moment frames.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012e). “Seismic performance assessment of buildings.”, Washington, DC.
GSA (General Service Administration). (2013). “Alternative path analysis & design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance.” 〈http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103205〉 (May 5, 2014).
Kelliher, D., and Sutton-Swaby, K. (2012). “Stochastic representation of blast load damage in a reinforced concrete building.” Struct. Saf., 34(1), 407–417.
Low, H. Y., and Hao, H. (2001). “Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete slabs under explosive loading.” Struct. Saf., 23(2), 157–178.
Low, H. Y., and Hao, H. (2002). “Reliability analysis of direct shear and flexural failure modes of, R. C. slabs under explosive loading.” Eng. Struct., 24(2), 189–198.
MATLAB 8.1 [Computer Software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Melchers, R. E. (1987). Structural reliability: Analysis and prediction, Wiley, New York.
Milani, G., and Lourenço, P. B. (2009). “Blast analysis of enclosure masonry walls using homogenization approaches.” Int. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng., 7(2), 91–113.
Mohamed, I., Rahman, N. A., and Seracino, R. (2014). “Numerical analysis of strengthened steel stud bearing walls to resist disproportionate collapse.” ASCE Structures Congress: 2174-2185, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Myers, J. J., Belarbi, A., and El-Domiaty, K. A. (2004). “Blast resistance of FRP retrofitted un-reinforced masonry (URM) walls with and without arching action.” 〈http://www.masonrysociety.org/html/resources/journal/〉 (Apr. 22, 2014).
Netherton, M. D., and Stewart, M. G. (2009). “The effects of explosive blast load variability on safety hazard and damage risks for monolithic window glazing.” Int. J. Impact Eng., 36(12), 1346–1354.
Netherton, M. D., and Stewart, M. G. (2010). “Blast load variability and accuracy of blast load prediction models.” Int. J. Protect. Struct., 1(4), 543–570.
NIST (National Institute of Standards, and Technology). (2010). “Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, U.S. Dept. of Commerce Engineering Laboratory, Gaithersburg, MD.
Pekau, O. A., and Cui, Y. (2006). “Progressive collapse simulation of precast panel shear walls during earthquake.” J. Comput. Struct., 84(5–6), 400–412.
Seyedrezai, S. (2011). “Modeling of arching unreinforced masonry walls subjected to blast loadings.” Master thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Stewart, M. G. (2010). “Risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism protective measures for infrastructure.” Int. J. Critical Infrastruct. Protect., 3(1), 29–40.
Stewart, M. G., and Netherton, M. D. (2008). “Security risks and probabilistic risk assessment of glazing subject to explosive blast loading.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 93(4), 627–638.
Stewart, M. G., Netherton, M. D., and Rosowsky, D. V. (2006). “Terrorism risks and blast damage to built infrastructure.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 114–122.
Twisdale, L. A., Sues, R. H., and Lavelle, F. M. (1994). “Reliability-based design methods for protective structures.” Struct. Saf., 15(1–2), 17–33.
USDOD (U.S. Department of Defense). (2008). “Unified facilities criteria. structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions.”, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30Issue 4August 2016

History

Received: Jun 30, 2014
Accepted: Mar 5, 2015
Published online: Sep 11, 2015
Discussion open until: Feb 11, 2016
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mostafa ElSayed [email protected]
Former Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. E-mail: [email protected]
Manuel Campidelli [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Centre for Effective Design of Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. E-mail: [email protected]
Wael El-Dakhakhni, F.ASCE [email protected]
Martini, Mascarin and George Chair in Masonry Design, Director, Applied Dynamics Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Michael Tait, M.ASCE [email protected]
Joe NG/JNE Consulting Chair in Design, Construction and Management in Infrastructure Renewal, Director, Centre for Effective Design of Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share