Technical Papers
Feb 27, 2013

Knowledge-Based Optimization of Building Maintenance, Repair, and Renovation Activities to Improve Facility Life Cycle Investments

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28, Issue 3

Abstract

Buildings and related civil infrastructure are an important factor of production that contribute directly to the accomplishment of an organization’s mission and/or the generation of revenue. Aging, obsolescence, and general deterioration of these buildings, and their systems and components, can adversely affect the ability to accomplish a mission or generate expected revenue, thus resulting in an elevated risk profile. Maintenance, repair, and renovation (MR&R) activities, when planned effectively, can affect performance in such a way to reduce this risk. A rapidly aging infrastructure and building stock in the United States and across the world jeopardizes the ability to generate output and accomplish a mission at status quo. Moreover, rapidly expanding demands on some infrastructure will likewise make the status quo greatly inadequate in the near future. This requires two highly interrelated strategies: (1) to introduce new capabilities and capacities into the infrastructure stock to meet projected demand; and (2) to adequately manage, maintain, improve, and renew the existing infrastructure stock to slow performance degradation and fill demand gaps. The objective of this study is to develop a methodology for rapidly identifying and selecting multiyear building MR&R activities, such that facility performance is maximized and life cycle costs are minimized. This is a significant step toward the development of a comprehensive facility life cycle MR&R model that incorporates infrastructure economics and uncertainty for improved decision making. The result of this study is a model framework, to be applied against a building or group of buildings, which selects the optimum mixture of work activities considering condition, capability, performance, and life cycle costs. A genetic algorithm is employed to optimize the activity selection, and the proposed model approach is implemented against an example building to illustrate the methodology.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Antelman, A., and Miller, C. (2002). “Mission dependency index validation report.” Special Publication SP-2113-SHR, Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA, 7–8.
Baik, H. S., Jeong, H. S., and Abraham, D. M. (2006). “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 15–24.
Bailey, D. M., et al. (1993). “ROOFER: Membrane and flashing condition indexes for single-ply membrane roofs—Inspection and distress manual.” USACERL TR FM-93/11, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Construction Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL.
BUILDER SMS 3.0 [Computer software]. Champaign, IL, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory.
Construction Specifications Institute (CSI). (2010a). MasterFormat 2010 update, Construction Specifications Institute, Alexandria, VA.
Construction Specifications Institute (CSI). (2010b). UniFormat. 〈http://www.csinet.org/Home-Page-Category/Formats/UniFormat.aspx〉.
Durango-Cohen, P. L., and Madanat, S. M. (2008). “Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 42(8), 1074–1085.
East W. E., and Brodt W. (2007). “BIM for construction handover.” J. Building Information Modeling, Vol. Fall 2007, 28–35.
Evolver Decision Tools Suite 6.2 [Computer software]. Ithaca, NY, Palisade.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning, Vol. 412, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Grussing, M. N., and Marrano, L. R. (2007). “Building component lifecycle repair/replacement model for institutional facility management.” Proc., 2007 ASCE Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 550–557.
Grussing, M. N., Uzarski, D. R., and Marrano, L. R. (2006). “Condition and reliability prediction models using the Weibull probability distribution.” Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation, ASCE, Reston, VA, 19–24.
Grussing, M. N., Uzarski, D. R., and Marrano, L. R. (2009). “Building infrastructure functional capacity measurement framework.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 371–377.
Guillaumot, V. M., et al. (2003). “Adaptive optimization of infrastructure maintenance and inspection decisions under performance model uncertainty.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 133–139.
Health Facilities Management. (2010). “Laser scanning helps bring older facilities up to date.” Health Facil. Manage., 23(I7), 6–6.
Lounis, Z., and Vanier, D. (2000). “A multiobjective and stochastic system for building maintenance management.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 15(5), 320–329.
Madanat, S., Mishalani, R., and Ibrahim, W. H. W. (1995). “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 120–125.
Marseguerra, M., Zio, E., and Podofillini, L. (2002). “Condition-based maintenance optimization by means of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 77(2), 151–165.
Moore, C., Tjioe, M., Manzella, A., Bernhardt, K. S., and McNeil, S. (2008). “Asset management insights using agent models.” Proc., 2007 Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 176–183.
OmniClass. (2010). “OmniClass: A strategy for classifying the built environment.” 〈http://www.omniclass.org〉 (May 14, 2012).
Quiggin, J. (1982). “A theory of anticipated utility.” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 3(4), 323–343.
RS Means. (1996). Cost planning and estimating for facilities maintenance, Kingston, MA.
RS Means. (2010). RS Means costworks 2010 facilities manager. Release 14.02, Kingston, MA.
Shahin, M. Y., and Kohn, S. D. (1979). “Development of a pavement condition rating procedure for roads, streets, and parking lots.” CERL-TR-M-268-VOL-2, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Construction Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). “Construction spending.” 〈http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/historical_data.html〉 (Apr. 15, 2012).
U.S. DOE. (2009). “Buildings energy data book.” Buildings Technologies Program, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 〈http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov〉 (Jun. 25, 2012).
Uzarski, D. R., and Burley, L. A., Jr. (1997). “Assessing building condition by the use of condition indexes.” Proc. Specialty Conf. on Infrastructure Condition Assessment: Art, Science, Practice, ASCE, Reston, VA, 365–374.
Zhang, Y., Vidakovic, B., and Augenbroe, G. (2005). “Uncertainty analysis in using Markov chain model to predict roof life cycle performance.” 10th Int. Conf. on Durability of Materials and Components, CIB World, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28Issue 3June 2014
Pages: 539 - 548

History

Received: Sep 25, 2012
Accepted: Feb 25, 2013
Published online: Feb 27, 2013
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael N. Grussing, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Researcher, Engineer Research and Development Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Champaign, IL 61822 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Liang Y. Liu, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share