Technical Papers
Jan 11, 2013

Fragility Analysis of Skewed Single-Frame Concrete Box-Girder Bridges

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28, Issue 3

Abstract

Damage to skewed bridges in recent earthquakes has reinforced the potential vulnerability of these structures. The effect of skew angle on a bridge’s fragility could vary for different bridge types, ages, or geometric configurations. This paper conducts a probabilistic seismic assessment of skewed bridge performance, focusing on single-frame concrete box-girder bridge subclasses. The effect of skew angle on bridge seismic fragility is investigated for bridges with single- or two-column bents, integral or seat-type abutments, and minimal or significant levels of seismic design. Component and system-level damage states consistent with HAZUS-MH definitions are also explored in this study. The results reveal that older bridges, which are more likely to experience higher damage states, are particularly susceptible to column damage and are not sensitive to skew. Similarly, the presence of integral abutments in newer bridges significantly reduces the vulnerability and minimizes the impact of the skew angle on bridge fragility. For new bridges with seat-type abutments, the bridge skew angle has a significant effect on component and system fragility for both single- and two-column bent bridges. For these subclasses, HAZUS-MH skew factors are found to reasonably estimate the shift in median value fragility from their straight counterparts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (1998). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
Anderson, D. L., Mitchell, D., and Tinawi, R. G. (1996). “Performance of concrete bridges during the Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake on January 17, 1995.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 23(3), 714–726.
Aviram, A., Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2008). “Guidelines for nonlinear analysis of bridge structures in California.” PEER Rep. 2008/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Ayyub, B. M., and Lai, K. L. (1989). “Structural reliability assessment using Latin hypercube sampling.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR), Part II, ASCE, New York.
Banerjee, S., and Shinozuka, M. (2008). “Experimental verification of bridge seismic damage states quantified by calibrating analytical models with empirical field data.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(4), 383–393.
Bavirisetty, R., Vinayagamoorthy, M., and Duan, L. (2000). “Dynamic analysis” Bridge engineering handbook, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, eds., CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Berry, M. P., and Eberhard, M. O. (2003). “Performance models for flexural damage in reinforced concrete columns.” PEER Rep. 2003/18, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Brandenberg, S. J., Zhang, J., Kashighandi, P., Huo, Y., and Zhao, M. (2011). “Demand fragility surfaces for bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading ground.” PEER Rep. 2011/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Buckle, I. G. (1994). “The Northridge, California, earthquake of January 17, 1994: Performance of highway bridges.” Technical Rep. NCEER-94-0008, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
CALTRANS. (2007). “Reinforced concrete bridge capacity assessment training manual.” Structure Maintenance and Investigations Rep., Sacramento, CA.
Cho, S., Eguchi, R. T., Ghosh, S., and Huyck, C. K. (2006). “REDARS validation report.” Rep. No. MCEER-06-0007, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Choi, E. (2002). “Seismic analysis and retrofit of Mid-America bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187–199.
Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 526–533.
Dutta, A. (1999). “On energy based seismic analysis and design of highway bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Ellingwood, B., and Hwang, H. (1985). “Probabilistic descriptions of resistance of safety related structures in nuclear plants.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 88(2), 169–178.
Fang, J., Li, Q., Jeary, A., and Liu, D. (1999). “Damping of tall buildings: Its evaluation and probabilistic characteristics.” Struct. Des. Tall Build., 8(2), 145–153.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1995). “Seismic retrofitting manual for highway bridges.” FHWA-RD-94-052, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2006). “Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures: Part 1—Bridges.” FHWA-HRT-06-032, Dept. of Transportation, McLean, VA.
FEMA. (2005). HAZUS-MH software, Washington, DC.
Fung, G. G., LeBeau, R. J., Klein, E. E., Belvedere, J., and Goldschmidt, A. F. (1971). Field investigation of bridge damage in the San Fernando earthquake, State of California, Division of Highways, Bridge Dept., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2002). “Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations.” J. Eng. Mech., 1024–1038.
Hwang, H., Liu, J. B., and Chiu, Y.-H. (2000). “Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges.” MAEC RR-4, Center for Earthquake Research and Information, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
Krawinkler, H., Medina, R., and Alavi, B. (2003). “Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions.” Eng. Struct., 25(5), 637–653.
Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2001). “Probabilistic seismic demand model for California bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 468–480.
Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2004). “Fragility curves for reinforced concrete highway overpass bridges.” Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.
Mander, J. B., Kim, D. K., Chen, S. S., and Premus, G. J. (1996). “Response of steel bridge bearings to the reversed cyclic loading.” Rep. No. NCEER 96-0014, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
McKenna, F., Scott, M., and Fenves, G. L. (2010). “Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 95–107.
Megally, S. H., Silva, P. F., and Seible, F. (2001). “Seismic response of sacrificial shear keys in bridge abutments.” Rep. No. SSRP-200l/23, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California at San Diego, San Diego.
Mid-America Earthquake Center (MAEC). (2007). “MAEViz software.” 〈http://http://mae.ce.uiuc.edu/software_and_tools/maeviz.html〉.
Morokoff, W. J., and Caflisch, R. E. (1995). “Quasi-Monte Carlo integration.” J. Comput. Phys., 122(2), 218–230.
Muthukumar, S., and DesRoches, R. A. (2006). “Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(7), 811–828.
Nielson, B. (2005). “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007a). “Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 615–633.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007b). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(6), 823–839.
Nielson, B. G., and Mackie, K. R. (2009). “Tracking uncertainties from component level to system level fragility analyses through simulation.” Proc., 10th Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering (TCLEE) Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER). (2000). “PEER strong motion database.” 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat〉.
Padgett, J. E. (2007). “Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted bridges using probabilistic methods.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(8), 1157–1174.
Padgett, J. E., Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(5), 711–725.
Pottatheere, P., and Renault, P. (2008). “Seismic vulnerability assessment of skew bridges.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.
Ramanathan, N. K. (2012). “Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
SAC Steel Project. (1997) “Suites of earthquake ground motions for analysis of steel moment frame structures.” 〈http://nisee.berkeley.edu/data/strong_motion/sacsteel/ground_motions.html〉 (Sep. 22, 2009).
Shafieezadeh, A., Ramanathan, K., Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R. (2012). “Fractional order intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling applied to highway bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(3), 391–409.
Shamsabadi, A., Kapuskar, M., and Martin, G. R. (2006). “Nonlinear seismic soil-abutment-structure interaction analysis of skewed bridges.” Proc., 5th National Seismic Conf. on Bridges and Highways: Innovation in Earthquake Engineering for Highway Structures, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Shamsabadi, A., Khalili-Tehrani, P., Stewart, J. P., and Taciroglu, E. (2010). “Validated simulation models for lateral response of bridge abutments with typical backfills.” J. Bridge Eng., 302–311.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Kim, H., Uzawa, T., and Ueda, T. (2003). “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” Rep. No. MCEER-03-0002, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Buffalo, NY.
Sullivan, I., and Nielson, B. G. (2010). “Sensitivity analysis of seismic fragility curves for skewed multi-span simply supported steel girder bridges.” Proc., 19th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Yang, C.-S., DesRoches, R., and Padgett, J. E. (2009). “Fragility curves for a typical California box girder bridge.” Proc., Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Yashinsky, M. (2010). “Performance of highway and railway structures during the February 27, 2010, Maule Chile earthquake.” EERI/PEER/FHWA Bridge Team Rep., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28Issue 3June 2014
Pages: 571 - 582

History

Received: Aug 16, 2012
Accepted: Jan 9, 2013
Published online: Jan 11, 2013
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Behzad Zakeri [email protected]
Researcher, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 16765-163, Narmak, Tehran 16846, Iran (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jamie E. Padgett, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Rice Univ., 6100 Main St., MS-318, Houston, TX 77005. E-mail: [email protected]
Gholamreza Ghodrati Amiri [email protected]
Professor, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 16765-163, Narmak, Tehran 16846, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share