Seismic Vulnerability of Older Braced Frames
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28, Issue 1
Abstract
Concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are broadly used as lateral-load resisting systems in buildings throughout the United States. Current state-of-the-practice is the use of special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs) where ductility under seismic loading is necessary. Prior to modern seismic codes, braced frames were designed without ductile detailing. Here these systems are termed nonseismic braced frames (NCBFs), which are essentially CBFs designed with no special detailing requirements. These may comply with older code requirements in high-seismicity regions or current code requirements in low-seismicity regions. Many are still in service throughout the United States. Prior research has focused on SCBFs, which has improved their seismic performance. In comparison, there is significant uncertainty regarding the seismic performance of NCBFs and they may be vulnerable to collapse. A study was conducted to evaluate this vulnerability. At the start, a pilot experimental test of NCBFs was conducted. These results were combined with prior analytical models developed for SCBFs to develop a preliminary model of NCBFs. The model was then used to evaluate seismic performance of an NCBF system and compare these results to an SCBF system. A 3-story prototype building was the vehicle for this comparison. The results show there is a significant seismic vulnerability and uncertainty associated with these structures, and they represent an unstudied significant seismic hazard in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation under grant Nos. CMS-0301792 (Performance-Based Design of Concentrically Braced Frames) and CMS-0619161 (NEESR-SG International Hybrid Simulation of Tomorrow’s Braced Frames), and the American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC). The financial support of these institutions is greatly appreciated.
References
AISC. (1997). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
AISC. (2005). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
AISC. (2010a). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
AISC. (2010b). Manual of steel construction, load and resistance factor design, 14th Ed., Chicago.
Chen, C.-H., and Mahin, S. (2010). “Seismic collapse performance of concentrically steel braced frames.” Proc., Structures Congress: 19th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA, 1265–1274.
Clark, K. A. (2009). “Experimental performance of multi-story x-brace systems.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
FEMA. (2000). “State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking.” FEMA 355C, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2004). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures—Part 1: Provisions, Washington, DC.
Gunnarsson, I. R. (2004). “Numerical performance evaluation of braced frame systems.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Herman, D. (2006). “Further improvements on and understanding of SCBF systems.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Hsiao, P. C., Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2012a). “A model to simulate special concentrically braced frames beyond brace fracture.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 42(2), 183–200.
Hsiao, P. C., Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2012b). “Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 42(10), 1547–1564.
Hsiao, P. C., Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2012c). “Improved analytical model for special concentrically braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 73(Jun), 80–94.
ICBO. (1988). “Uniform building code 1988.” Proc., Int. Conf. of Building Officials, Whittier, CA.
ICBO. (1994). “Uniform building code 1994 (uniform building code vol. 2: Structural engineering design provisions).” Proc., Int. Conf. of Building Officials, Whittier, CA.
Johnson, S. (2005). “Improved seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Kotulka, B. A. (2007). “Analysis for a design guide on gusset plates used in special concentrically braced frames.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Lehman, D. E., Roeder, C. W., Herman, D., Johnson, S., and Kotulka, B. (2008). “Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 890–901.
Liu, J., and Astaneh-Asl, A. (2004). “Moment-rotation parameters for composite shear tab connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 1371–1380.
Lumpkin, E. J. (2009). “Enhanced seismic performance of multi-story special concentrically brace frames using a balanced design procedure.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2009). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual—OpenSees version 2.0, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Powell, J. (2009). “Evaluation of special concentrically braced frames for improved seismic performance and constructability.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Roeder, C. W., Lumpkin, E. J., and Lehman, D. E. (2011). “Balanced design procedure for special concentrically braced frame connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(11), 1760–1772.
Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, J. (1997). “Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project.” Rep. No. SAC/BD-97/04: SAC background document, FEMA, Sacramento, CA.
USGS. (2008). “Hazard mapping images and data.” Earthquake Hazards Program, Reston, VA. 〈http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards〉 (Sep. 5. 2010).
Yoo, J. H. (2006) “Analytical investigation on the seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Yoo, J. H., Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2008a). “Influence of connection design parameters on the seismic performance of braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(6), 607–623.
Yoo, J. H., Roeder, C. W., and Lehman, D. E. (2008b) “Analytical performance simulation of special concentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 881–889.
Yoo, J. H., Roeder, C. W., and Lehman, D. E. (2009). “Simulated behavior of multi-story x-braced frames.” Eng. Struct., 31(1), 182–197.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28 • Issue 1 • February 2014
Pages: 108 - 120
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 15, 2012
Accepted: Sep 10, 2012
Published online: Sep 12, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.