Assessment of Seismic Vulnerability of Structures in Sikkim, India, Based on Damage Observation during Two Recent Earthquakes
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27, Issue 6
Abstract
Recently, two earthquakes ( on February 14, 2006, and on September 18, 2011) struck the mountainous region of Sikkim, one of the most seismically active regions in India. The 2006 event, though of lesser magnitude, clearly showed the high seismic vulnerability of different structures in Sikkim, especially in the state capital, Gangtok. Damage observed in buildings in and around Gangtok was disproportionately high during the 2006 event, considering the small size of the earthquake. It was expected and hoped that the 2006 event would act as a wake-up call to all stake holders in the society to improve the construction practices in the region. However, the bigger earthquake of 2011 not only affected the older structures but also severely damaged a large number of new structures. Comparison of observed damage with structures in Sikkim during these two earthquakes clearly demonstrates an alarming rise in seismic vulnerability of structures in Sikkim.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial and administrative help received from the Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati during the postearthquake reconnaissance visit. Several individuals, students, and engineers in Guwahati and Sikkim helped in conducting the survey and preparation of this paper. Special mention should be made of Mr. Bobo Gurung of Public Health Engineering, Government of Sikkim, for arranging local logistics and in providing useful information.
References
Augenti, N., Parisi, F., Prota, A., and Manfredi, G. (2011). “In-plane lateral response of a full-scale masonry subassemblage with and without an inorganic matrix-grid strengthening system.” J. Compos. Constr., 15(4), 578–590.
Bilham, R. (2004). “Historical studies of earthquakes in India.” Ann. Geophys., 47(2), 839–858.
Bilham, R., Gaur, V. K., and Molnar, P. (2001). “Himalayan seismic hazard.” Science, 293(5534), 1442–1444.
Bureau of Indian Standards. (1993). “Indian standard criteria for ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces—Code of practice.” IS13920, New Delhi, India.
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2002). “ Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings (5th revision).” IS1893, New Delhi, India.
Dasgupta, S., et al. (2000). Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs, P. L. Narula, S. K. Acharyya, and J. Banerjee, eds., Geological Survey of India, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
De, R., and Kayal, J. R. (2003). “Seismotectonic model of the Sikkim Himalaya: Constraint from microearthquake surveys.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(3), 1395–1400.
Dunn, J. A., Auden, J. B., Ghosh, A. M. N., and Roy, S. C. (1939). “The Bihar-Nepal earthquake of 1934.” Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Geological Survey of India, Calcutta, India, 73.
Government of India, Ministry of Earth Sciences. (2011) “Strong motion data records of September 2011 Sikkim Earthquake generated by accelerographs, being maintained by IIT (KH) and IIT (R) with support of MoES, along with a report by IIT (Kh) can be used freely by Indian scientific community.” 〈http://dod.nic.in/motion.html〉 (Feb. 1, 2012).
Kaushik, H. B., Dasgupta, K., Sahoo, D. R., and Kharel, G. (2006). “Performance of structures during the Sikkim earthquake of February 14, 2006.” Curr. Sci., 91(4), 449–455.
Kaushik, H. B., and Jain, S. K. (2007). “Impact of great December 26, 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami on structures in Port Blair.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 21(2), 128–142.
Kayal, J. R. (2008). Microearthquake seismology and seismotectonics at South Asia, Capital, New Delhi, India.
Medvedev, S., Sponheuer, W., and Karnik, V. (1964). “Neue seismische Skala.” Proc., 7th Symp. of the European Seismological Commission, W. Sponheuer, ed., Vol. 77, Institute of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Research, Jena, Germany, and German Academy of Sciences, Berlin, 69–76.
Narula, P. L., and Sharda, Y. P. (1997). A review of great earthquake of 1897—Lessons learnt and mitigation strategies, the great Shillong earthquake—1897: A centennial retrospective, Association of Exploration Geophysicists, Hyderabad, India.
Nath, S. K., Sengupta, P., Sengupta, S., and Chakrabarti, A. (2000). “Site response estimation using strong motion network: A step towards microzonation of the Sikkim Himalayas.” Curr. Sci., 79(9), 1316–1326.
Oldham, R. D. (1899). “Report on the great earthquake of 12th June, 1897.” Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Geological Survey of India, Calcutta, 29.
Rajendran, K., Rajendran, C. P., Thulasiraman, N., Andrews, R., and Sherpa, N. (2011). “The September 18, 2011, North Sikkim Earthquake.” Curr. Sci., 101(11), 1475–1479.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27 • Issue 6 • December 2013
Pages: 697 - 720
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 4, 2012
Accepted: Jul 23, 2012
Published online: Aug 8, 2012
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.