Operational Structural Performance of Bridge Types by Areas
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper demonstrates trends in bridge structural deficiency and evaluates the operational structural performance of various types of bridge structural design and/or construction. The study analyzes the database of the National Bridge Inventory and derives data based on actual bridge deck areas, rather than discrete bridge counts. Based on the concept of structural deficiency and the objective of life-cycle expectancy for uninterrupted service life, the multiple-criteria diagnostic analysis determines condition, durability, longevity, and equivalent performance. For some bridge types, the results reflect limited remaining service life before structural deficiency is reached. Average service life is only 56% of life-cycle expectancy. The relatively higher condition performance contrasts with the significantly poor performance of durability and the relatively lower longevity. The equivalent structural performance of some bridge types is low. Overall, the study provides an indication of the current average potential, which serves as a basis for predicting future performance under similar operational conditions. The systems approach supports more objective design, maintenance, and decision-making practices, leading to more effective operation and management and more sustainable infrastructure solutions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (1994). Manual for condition evaluation of bridges, 2nd Ed., Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2003). Guide manual for condition evaluation and load and resistance factor rating (LRFR) of highway bridges, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2007). “Meeting the needs of America’s bridges: The voice of transportation.” MNAB-1, Washington, DC.
Aktan, A. E., et al. (1996). “Condition assessment for bridge management.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 2(3), 108–117.
Aktan, A. E., Dalal, V., Farhey, D. N., and Hunt, V. J. (1995). “Bridge reliability evaluation in the 21st century.” Proc., Research Transformed into Practice—Implementation of NSF Research, J. Colville and A. M. Amde, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 493–505.
Alampalli, S., and Washer, G. A., eds. (2002). Proc., Structural Materials Technology V—An NDT Conf., American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH.
Ben-Akiva, M., Humplick, F., Madanat, S., and Ramaswamy, R. (1993). “Infrastructure management under uncertainty: Latent performance approach.” J. Transp. Eng., 119(1), 43–58.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2004). Pontis modeling approach overview, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2009). Pontis bridge management system version 4.4, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Darbani, B. M., and Hammad, A. (2007). “Critical review of new directions in bridge management systems.” Proc., ASCE Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, L. Soibelman and B. Akinci, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Dunker, K. F., and Rabbat, B. G. (1990). “Highway bridge type and performance patterns.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 4(3), 161–173.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2005). “Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: State of practice and research issues.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 1(1), 7–18.
Farhey, D. N. (2010). “Performance of bridge materials by structural deficiency analysis.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 24(4), 345–352.
Farhey, D. N. (2011). “Operational structural performances of bridge types.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 25(6), 554–563.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1995). “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation's bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA-PD-96-001, Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) (2000). “Our nation’s highways—2000.” Rep. No. FHWA-PL-01-1012, Office of Highway Policy Information (OHPI), Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) (2003). “Status of the nation’s highways, bridges, and transit: 2002 conditions and performance report.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.htm〉 (Feb. 10, 2005).
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) (2007). “National Bridge Inventory (NBI).” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.htm〉 (May 23, 2007).
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., and Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). “Reliability-based lifecycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 15(1), 27–34.
Furuta, H., Kameda, T., and Frangopol, D. M. (2004) “Balance of structural performance measures.” Proc., 2004 Structures Congress—Building on the Past: Securing the Future, G. E. Blandford, ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, 19–23.
Ghasemi, H., Penrod, J., and Hooks, J. M. (2009). “Developing advanced methods of assessing bridge performance.” Public Roads, FHWA, 73(3).
Kong, J. S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2003). “System reliability modeling in bridge management.” Proc., 9th Int. Bridge Management Conf., IBMC03, Transportation Research Circular E-C049, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 361–372.
Mishalani, R. G., and Koutsopoulos, H. N. (1995). “Uniform infrastructure fields: Definition and identification.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(1), 44–55.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2010). “Guide for selecting level-of-service targets for maintaining and operating highway assets.” NCHRP 14-25 [RFP], 〈http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=2970〉 (Nov. 4, 2010).
Pan, N.-F., Lin, T.-C., and Pan, N.-H. (2009). “Estimating bridge performance based on a matrix-driven fuzzy linear regression model.” Automation in construction, Vol. 18, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 578–586.
Saito, M., ed. (1997). Infrastructure Condition Assessment: Art, Science, and Practice, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Sanford, K. L., Herabat, P., and McNeil, S. (1999). “Bridge management and inspection data: Leveraging the data and identifying the gaps.” Proc., 8th Int. Bridge Management Conf., Vol. 1, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Stewart, M. G. (2001). “Reliability-based assessment of ageing bridges using risk ranking and life cycle cost decision analyses.” Reliability engineering and system safety, Vol. 74, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 263–273.
Sun, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, R., Wang, X., and Chapman, J. (2004). “Analysis of past national bridge inventory ratings for predicting bridge system preservation needs.” Transportation Research Record 1866, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 36–43.
Thurston, D. L. (1991). “A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes.” Res. Eng. Des., 3(2), 105–122.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27 • Issue 3 • June 2013
Pages: 303 - 318
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 17, 2011
Accepted: Dec 16, 2011
Published online: May 15, 2013
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.