Technical Papers
Nov 3, 2011

Deterioration Prediction of Timber Bridge Elements Using the Markov Chain

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27, Issue 3

Abstract

Timber bridges require high accumulated maintenance costs, which can be many times greater than their initial cost. Infrastructure managers need deterioration models to assist with making appropriate decisions concerning repair strategies and program maintenance schedules by accurately predicting the future condition of timber bridge elements. Markov chain–based models have been used extensively in modeling the deterioration of infrastructure facilities. These models can predict the condition of bridge elements as a probabilistic estimate. This paper presents the prediction of future condition of timber bridge elements using a stochastic Markov chain model. Condition data obtained from the Roads Corporation of Victoria, Australia, were used to develop transition probabilities. The percentage prediction method, regression-based optimization method, and nonlinear optimization technique were applied to predict transition matrices and transient probabilities from the condition data. The most suitable deterioration model for timber bridge elements was selected by evaluating the model performances using the goodness-of-fit and reliability tests. It was concluded that the Markov chain developed for deterioration prediction of timber bridges using the nonlinear optimization technique was mathematically acceptable and predicts the deterioration progression with reasonable accuracy.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ariyaratne, W., and Crews, K. I. (2003). “Design and asset management of bridges.” Postgraduate Lecture Notes, Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales and Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Bulusu, S., and Sinha, K. C. (1997). “Comparison of methodologies to predict bridge deterioration.” Transportation Research Record 1597, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–42.
Cochran, W. G. (1954). “Some methods for strengthening the common χ2 tests.” Biometrics, 10(4), 417–451.
Crews, K., Samali, B., Li, J., Bakoss, S. and Champion C. (2004). “Testing and assessment procedures to facilitate the management of timber bridge assets.” Proc., 3rd CECAR—Civil Engineering Conf. in the Asian Region, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Seoul.
Jiang, Y., Saito, M., and Sinha, K. C. (1998). “Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transportation Research Record 1180, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 25–32.
Joppe, M. (2000). “The research process.” 〈http://www.htm.uoguelph.ca/pagefiles/MJResearch/ResearchProcess/home.html〉 (Mar. 3, 2010).
Madanat, S., Mishalani, R., and Ibrahim, W. H. W. (1995). “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(2), 120–125.
Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., and Coombes, P. (2002). “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(2), 49–56.
Montgomery, D. C., Runger, G. C., and Hubele, N. F. (2004). Engineering statistics, Wiley, New York.
Moore, D. S. (1986). “Tests of chi-squared type.” Goodness-of-fit techniques, R. B. D’Agostino and M. A. Stephens, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 63–95.
Ross, S. M. (1972). Introduction to probability models, Academic, New York.
Tran, H. D. (2007). “Investigation of deterioration models for stormwater pipe systems.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Architectural, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Victoria Univ., Melbourne, Australia.
Veshosky, D., Beidleman, C. R., Bueton, G. W., and Demir, M. (1994). “Comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.” J. Struct. Eng., 120(7), 2123–2136.
VicRoads Technical Consulting (VicRoads). (2011) Road structures inspection manual, 〈http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/5E40D538-608D-45B8-B9F4-4144C3799B5B/0/Road_Structures_Inspection_Manual_Apr_2011.pdf〉 (Sep. 10, 2011).
Winter, G. (2000). “A comparative discussion of the notion of ‘validity’ in qualitative and quantitative research.” Qual. Rep., 4(3-4) 〈http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html〉 (Mar. 2, 2010).
Yanev, B. (1996). “Discussion of comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.” J. Struct. Eng., 122(6), 709–710.
Yanev, B. (1997). “Life-cycle performance of bridge components in New York City.” Proc., Recent Advances in Bridge Eng., Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 385–392.
Yanev, B. (1998). “The management of bridges in New York City.” Eng. Struct., 20(11), 1020–1026.
Yanev, B., and Chen, X. (1993). “Life-cycle performance of New York City bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1389, 17–24.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27Issue 3June 2013
Pages: 319 - 325

History

Received: Jun 1, 2011
Accepted: Oct 31, 2011
Published online: Nov 3, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shrigandhi Ranjith [email protected]
Research Officer, Master of Engineering, School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) Univ., 124 LaTrobe St., Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Sujeeva Setunge
Associate Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) Univ., 124 LaTrobe St., Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia.
Rebecca Gravina
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) Univ., 124 LaTrobe St., Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia.
Srikanth Venkatesan
Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering, College of Engineering and Science, Victoria Univ., 306 Footscray Park, P.O. Box 14428, Victoria 8001, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share