Technical Papers
Aug 17, 2011

Using Fuzzy Failure Mode Effect Analysis to Model Cave-In Accidents

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26, Issue 5

Abstract

Behavioral, managerial, and technical problems cause construction injury accidents. Among these accidents, cave-ins are some of the most frequently occurring accidents. Mitigating hazards that result in cave-ins are of great importance in managing and controlling excavation practices. This paper introduces a new conceptual risk mitigation tool that can be adopted to minimize cave-in hazards and be employed as a quality-control tool before and during excavations. It provides a list of hazards in ranked order from the most frequent to least frequent and most hazardous to least hazardous causes that managers should focus on and invest resources into. Precise risk evaluation for cave-ins using traditional methods of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) can be challenging, because the variables involved in cave-ins are unique, and historical data are often incomplete. In construction, estimation of risk is based on severity, frequency of occurrence, and likelihood of detection; management teams assess these factors prior to failure occurrences using subjective judgment expressed by linguistic values, such as severe and very likely. Such linguistic terms can be best modeled using the fuzzy set theory. The traditional FMEA method has been widely used to calculate a risk priority number (RPN), which is a weighted assessment used to prioritize risk items. The calculation of the RPN is based on the rating of three variables: (1) severity, (2) frequency of occurrence, and (3) likelihood of detection. The traditional RPN is the product of these variables. Implementation of the FMEA for construction projects must be modified, because calculation of the RPN in construction projects is based on managerial experience using experiential, subjective expressions. The RPN is substituted for fuzzy rating calculation using alpha cuts and fuzzy arithmetic, in order to perform the fuzzy operations of the variables and to introduce a workable model of a fuzzy risk priority number (FRPN). For assessment purposes, the FRPNs are ranked. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the potential application of the proposed fuzzy failure mode effect analysis (FFMEA) and the detailed computational process of the FRPN. An application of the FFMEA is presented for the assessment of construction trenching safety risk. The FFMEA method introduced is intended to be used for (1) anticipating potential cave-in accidents prior to their occurrence; (2) assessing risks associated with excavation work; (3) providing a list of likely cave-in accident scenarios associated with excavation work in advance; and (4) preparing solutions and taking corrective actions before cave-in accidents occur.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al-Bahar, J. F., and Crandall, K. C. (1990). “Systematic risk management approach for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(3), 533–546.
Ayyub, B. M. (2003). Risk analysis in engineering and economics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Hinze, J., and Bern, K. (1997). “The cause of trenching related fatalities and injuries.” Construction Congress V: Managing engineered construction in expanding global markets, S. D. Anderson, ed., ASCE, Minneapolis, 389–398.
Hinze, J., and McClelland, T. (1997). “Trenchless technology: The jewel of underground construction.” North American Conf. and Exhibition of Trenchless Technology, North American Society of Trenchless Technology, Chicago, 19–22.
Klir, G., and Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Lee, S., and Halpin, D. W. (2003). “Predictive tool for estimating accident risk.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(4), 431–436.
Lee, S., Halpin, D., and Chang, H. (2006). “Quantifying effects of accidents by fuzzy-logic- and simulation-based analysis.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 33(3), 219–226.
Lew, J., Abraham, D., Wirahadikusumah, R., Irizarry, J., and Arboleda, C. (2002). “Excavation and trenching safety: existing standards and challenges.” Implement. Safety Health Construct. Sites, CIB W099 Conf., S. Rowlinson, ed., International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, Hong Kong, 103–109.
Ross, T. J. (2004). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
U.S. Department of Defense. (1980). “Procedures for performing a failure mode and effect analysis.” U.S. MIL-STD 1629A, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2012). “Excavations.” 29 CFR Part 1926 (subpart P), 〈http://www.osha.gov〉 (Mar. 2, 2012).
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26Issue 5October 2012
Pages: 702 - 719

History

Received: Jan 21, 2011
Accepted: Aug 15, 2011
Published online: Aug 17, 2011
Published in print: Oct 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

H. M. Al-Humaidi, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kuwait Univ., P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
F. Hadipriono Tan, F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share