TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 30, 2010

Assessment of Damage Risks to Residential Buildings and Cost–Benefit of Mitigation Strategies Considering Hurricane and Earthquake Hazards

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26, Issue 1

Abstract

Damage to residential buildings in the United States caused by hurricanes, earthquakes, and other natural hazards is significant. Economic losses average approximately $5.4 billion annually from hurricanes and approximately $4.4 billion a year from earthquakes. In certain areas, multiple hazards pose a significant threat to buildings, however, it is a challenge to optimize allocation of hazard mitigation resources. To cost-effectively mitigate risk from multiple natural hazards, a better understanding of building performance during extreme natural events will provide a basis for achieving cost-effective mitigation of risk from competing natural hazards. This paper demonstrates a risk-cost-benefit framework for assessing damage risks and cost-effectiveness of mitigation strategies for residential buildings using life-cycle and scenario-case analysis. The framework includes probabilistic modeling of the occurrence and intensity of natural hazards, structural system fragility modeling to represent the conditional probability of damage, and a model of total expected cost during different service intervals. The assessment can support improvements in design and construction practices, insurance underwriting, and planning community response to disasters. Many factors that are hard to quantify yet important in risk assessment are discussed for their roles and impacts on hazard mitigation decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported, in part, by Department of Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) (UNSPECIFIEDFA-9550-07-1-0500). Their support is gratefully acknowledged. However, the writer takes sole responsibility for the views expressed in this paper. The author would like to thank Professor Howard Qi in the School of Business and Economics at Michigan Technological University for his invaluable comments and suggestions when preparing this paper.

References

ASCE. (2005). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” 7-05, Reston, VA.
ASCE. (2006). “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings.” ASCE/SEI 41-06, Reston, VA.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2010). NEHRP Workshop on Meeting the Challenges of Existing Buildings—Part 1: Workshop Proc., ATC-71, Redwood City, CA.
Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines, J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526–533.
CUREE. (2000). “CUREE-Caltech Woodframe Project.” 〈http://www.curee.org/projects/woodframe〉 (Aug. 18, 2000).
Duthinh, D., and Simiu, E. (2010). “Safety of structures in strong winds and earthquakes: Multihazard considerations.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(3), 330–333.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Wen, Y. K. (2005). “Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low probability/high consequence earthquake events in Mid-America.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 7(2), 56–70.
Englehardt, J. D., and Peng, C. (1996). “Bayesian benefit-risk model applied to the south Florida building code.” Risk Anal., 16(1), 81–91.
FEMA. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-273, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2000). HAZUS 99 estimated annualized earthquake losses for the United States, FEMA-366, Washington, DC.
Galambos, T. V., and Ellingwood, B. R. (1986). “Serviceability limit states: Deflection.” J. Struct. Eng., 112(1), 67–84.
Goodnough, A. (2006). “As hurricane season looms, state aim to scare.” New York Times, May 31, 2.
Harper, B. A. (1999). “Tropical cyclone winds and storm tide.” Local government disaster mitigation project—Cairns, Hervey Bay and Mackay, Queensland Dept. of Emergency Services, Brisbane, and Systems Engineering Australia, Queensland, Australia.
Hsee, C., and Weber, E. U. (1999). “Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions.” J. Behav. Decis. Making, 12(2), 165–179.
Insurance Research Council (IRC) and Insurance Institute for Property Loss Reduction (IIPLR). (1995). Coastal exposure and community protection: Hurricane Andrew’s legacy, IRC; IIPLR, Wheaton, IL; Boston.
IBHS. (2001). The ten most wanted: A search for solutions to reduce recurring losses from natural hazards, IBHS, Tampa, FL.
Katz, R. W. (2002). “Stochastic modeling of hurricane damage.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 41(7), 754–762.
Kunreuther, H. (2000). Decision making for protective measures. Workshop on extreme events: Developing a research agenda for the 21st century.http://www.isse.ucar.edu/extremes/index.html
Kunreuther, H. (2007). “Assessing, managing and benefiting from global interdependent risks: The case of terrorism and natural disasters.” 2007 CREATE Symp., Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kunreuther, H., and Michel-Kerjan, E. (2009). “Managing catastrophes through insurance: Challenges and opportunities for reducing future risks.” Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2006). “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct., 28(7), 1009–1018.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2007). “Reliability of woodframe residential construction subjected to earthquakes.” Struct. Saf., 29(4), 294–307.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2009a). “A Performance-based framework for multi-hazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction.” J. Struct. Eng., 135(2), 159–168.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2009b). “Risk-based decision making for multi-hazard mitigation for wood-frame residential construction.” Aust. J. Struct. Eng., 9(1), 17–26.
Li, Y., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2012). “Loss-based formulation for multiple hazards with application to residential buildings.” Eng. Struct., in press.
Li, Y., Yin, Y. J., Ellingwood, B. R., and Bulleit, W. M. (2010). “Uniform hazard vs. uniform risk bases for performance-based earthquake engineering of light-frame wood construction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1199–1217.
Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. (1992). “Anomalies in intertemporal choice.” Q. J. Econ., 107(2), 573–597.
McCullough, M., and Kareem, A. (2009). “Anatomy of damage to coastal construction: A multi-hazard perspective.” 2009 Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Meyer, R., and Hutchinson, W. (2001). “Bumbling geniuses: The power of everyday reasoning in multistage decision making.” Wharton on making decisions, S. Hoch, H. Kunreuther, and R. Gunther, eds., Wiley, New York.
NAHB. (1993). “Assessment of damage to single-family homes caused by Hurricane Andrew and Iniki.” NAHB Research Center Rep., Upper Marlboro, MD.
NAHB. (1996). “Assessment of damage to homes caused by Hurricane Opal, prepared for the Florida State Home Builders Association.” NAHB Research Center Rep., Upper Marlboro, MD.
NAHB. (1999). “Reliability of conventional residential construction: An assessment of roof component performance in Hurricane Andrew and typical wind regions of the United States.” NAHB Research Center Rep., Upper Marlboro, MD.
National Institute of Buildings Sciences (NIBS). (2000). “HAZUS wind loss estimation methodology.” Draft Technical Manual, Washington, DC.
Padgett, J. E., Dennemann, K., and Ghosh, J. (2010). “Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment.” Struct. Saf., 32(3), 165–173.
Palm, R. I., Hodgson, M. E., Blanchard, D. R., and Lyons, D. I. (1990). Earthquake insurance in California: Environmental policy and individual decision making, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Pang, W. C., Rosowsky, D. V., Ellingwood, B. R., and Yue, W. (2009). “Seismic fragility analysis and retrofit of conventional residential wood frame structures in the central United States.” J. Struct. Eng., 135(3), 262–271.
Pinelli, J. P., Torkian, B. B., Gurley, K., Subramanian, C., and Hamid, S. (2009). “Cost effectiveness of hurricane mitigation measures for residential buildings.” 11th Americas Conf. on Wind Engineering (ACWE), American Association for Wind Engineering, Fort Collins, CO.
Reardon, G. F., and Henderson, D. (1988). “Cyclone risk assessment of houses in North Queensland.” Australasian Structural Engineering Conf. 1988, Vol. 2, J. Butterworth, ed., Structural Engineering Society of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand, 1007–1014.
Stewart, M. G., Rosowsky, D. V., and Huang, Z. (2000). “Hurricane damage risk-cost-benefit analysis and the economic viability of strengthening new and existing residential construction.” Wood Engineering and Mechanics Research Rep. No. WEM-00-001, Depts. of Forest Products and Civil Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
Smyth, A. W., et al. (2004). “Probabilistic benefit-cost analysis for earthquake damage mitigation: evaluating measures for apartment houses in Turkey.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(1), 171–203.
Van de Lindt, J., Li, Y., Bulleit, W., Gupta, R., and Morris, P. (2009). “The next step for AF&PA/ASCE 16: Performance-based design of wood structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 135(6), 611–618.
van de Lindt, J. W., Graettinger, A., Gupta, R., Skaggs, Pryor S., and Fridley, K. (2007). “Performance of woodframe structures during Hurricane Katrina.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 21(2), 108–116.
van de Lindt, J. W., Pei, S., Pryor, S. E., Shimizu, H., and Isoda, H. (2010). “Experimental seismic response of a full-scale six-story light-frame wood building.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(10), 1262–1272.
Vickery, P. J., Skerlj, P. F., Steckley, A. C., and Twisdale, L. A. (2000). “Hurricane wind field model for use in hurricane simulations.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(10), 1203–1222.
Walker, G. R., and Musulin, R. (2010). “Incentives for mitigation—Who pays, who benefits?” 2010 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) Conf., Wellington, New Zealand.
Wen, Y. K., and Kang, Y. J. (2001). “Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria I: Methodology.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(3), 330–337.
Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM). (2004). “Design of wood frame buildings for high wind, snow and seismic loadings.” American Forest & Paper Association, Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM), American Wood Council and International Code Council, Leesburg, VA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26Issue 1February 2012
Pages: 7 - 16

History

Received: Sep 23, 2010
Accepted: Dec 27, 2010
Published online: Dec 30, 2010
Published in print: Feb 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yue Li, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI 49931. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share