TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 21, 2010

Loss Estimation of Light-Frame Wood Construction Subjected to Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 25, Issue 6

Abstract

Aftershocks occur following an earthquake of large magnitude (referred to as the mainshock) and cause further damage to buildings that may have sustained damage in the mainshock. In this paper, an object-oriented framework is proposed to estimate seismic losses of light-frame wood buildings subjected to mainshock and aftershock sequences. Mainshocks are simulated as a homogeneous Poisson process, whereas aftershocks are simulated as a nonhomogeneous Poisson process. Back-to-back mainshock-aftershock nonlinear dynamic analysis is performed to determine the maximum interstory drift attributable to each earthquake occurrence (either mainshock or aftershock). Seismic risk is quantified in terms of economic losses in this paper. The damage loss (transition cost) and downtime cost are included in the loss estimation, considering a time-discount factor. Last, the proposed framework is demonstrated by an example that examines the seismic loss of typical light-frame wood residential buildings in the United States. The results show that aftershocks and downtime cost are important contributors to total seismic losses. Future work is identified to further investigate the effect of mainshock and aftershock sequences on seismic loss.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank Dr. Jack Baker at Stanford University for providing the code for the attenuation model (http://www.stanford.edu/~bakerjw/epsilon.html) used in this study.

References

Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W. J. (1997). “Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquake.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 68(1), 94–127.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2009a). “Guidelines for seismic performance assessment of buildings, ATC-58 50% draft.” Rep. prepared for U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Redwood City, CA, 〈http://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/ATC-58-50percentDraft.pdf〉.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2009b). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors.” FEMA P695, Redwood City, CA.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1077–1095.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2008). “Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation.” Struct. Saf., 30(3), 236–252.
Bommer, J. J., and Crowley, H. (2006). “The influence of ground-motion variability in earthquake loss modelling.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 4(3), 231–248.
Bradley, B. A., and Lee, D. S. (2010). “Accuracy of approximate methods of uncertainty propagation in seismic loss estimation.” Struct. Saf., 32(1), 13–24.
Bratley, P., Fox, B. L., and Schrage, L. E. (1987). A guide to simulation, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Burnecki, K., Hardle, W., and Weron, R. (2004). “An introduction to simulation of risk processes.” Encyclopedia of actuarial science, J. Teugels and B. Sundt, eds., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
China Earthquake Administration. (2009). “Aftershock statistics of the Wen-Chuan earthquake.” 〈http://www.cea.gov.cn/manage/html/8a8587881632fa5c0116674a018300cf/_content/09_02/17/1234834558685.html〉 (Jan. 18, 2009) (in Chinese).
Christovasilis, I. P., Filiatrault, A., Constantinou, M. C., and Wanitkorkul, A. (2009). “Incremental dynamic analysis of woodframe buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(4), 477–496.
Cornell, C. A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000). “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News, 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu/news/2000spring/performance.html〉.
Deierlein, G. G. (2004). “Overview of a comprehensive framework for earthquake performance assessment.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design—Concepts and Implementation, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 15–26.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Rosowsky, D. (1996). “Combining snow and earthquake loads for limit states design.” J. Struct. Eng., 122(11), 1364–1368.
Folz, B., and Filiatrault, A. (2001). “Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(4), 433–441.
Folz, B., and Filiatrault, A. (2004). “Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. II: Model implementation and verification.” J. Struct. Eng., 130(9), 1361–1370.
Gutenberg, B., and Richter, C. F. (1949). Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Huang, Y.-N., Whittaker, A. S., and Luco, N. (2008). “Performance assessment of conventional and based-isolated nuclear power plants for earthquake and blast loadings.” Rep. No. MCEER-08-0019, Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York.
Jiang, X., and Adeli, H. (2004). “Object-oriented model for freeway work zone capacity and queue delay estimation.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 19(2), 144–156.
Lewis, P. A. W., and Shedler, G. S. (1979). “Simulation of nonhomogeneous Poisson process by thinning.” Nav. Res. Logist. Q., 26(3), 403–413.
Li, Q., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2007a). “Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(3), 405–427.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2007b). “Reliability of woodframe residential construction subjected to earthquakes.” Struct. Saf., 29(4), 294–307.
Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., Deierlein, G. G., and Baker, J. W. (2009). “Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings.” Struct. Saf., 31(2), 197–211.
Luco, N., Bazzurro, P., and Cornell, C. A. (2004). “Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock.” Proc., 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Int. Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE), Tokyo.
Omori, F. (1894). “On the aftershocks of earthquake.” J. Coll. Sci., Imp. Univ. Tokyo, 7, 111–200.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center. (2010). “PEER ground motion selection and modification program (GMSM).” 〈http://peer.berkeley.edu/gmsm/Mission.html〉 (Jan. 8, 2010)
Padgett, J. E., Dennemann, K., and Ghosh, J. (2010). “Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment.” Struct. Saf., 32(3), 165–173.
Parrino, R., and Kidwell, D. (2008). Fundamentals of corporate finance, 1st Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Pei, S., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2009). “Methodology for earthquake-induced loss estimation: An application to woodframe buildings.” Struct. Saf., 31(1), 31–42.
Reasenberg, P. A., and Jones, L. M. (1989). “Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California.” Science, 243(4895), 1173–1176.
Reasenberg, P. A., and Jones, L. M. (1994). “Earthquake aftershocks: Update.” Science, 265(5176), 1251–1252.
Stewart, M. G. (2003). “Cyclone damage and temporal changes to building vulnerability and economic risks for residential construction.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91(5), 671–691.
Sunasaka, Y., and Kiremidjian, A. S. (1993). “A method for structural safety evaluation under mainshock-aftershock earthquake sequences.” Rep. No. 105, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, CA.
USGS. (2010). “Aftershocks rattle Chile after earthquake.” 〈http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/290_-35.php〉 (Mar. 20, 2010).
Utsu, T. (1995). “The centenary of the Omori Formula for a decay law of aftershock activity.” J. Phys. Earth, 43(1), 1–33.
van de Lindt, J. W. (2008). “Experimental investigation of the effect of multiple earthquakes on woodframe structural integrity.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 13(3), 111–117.
Wang, G.-Q., Boore, D. M., Igel, H., and Zhou, X.-Y. (2004). “Comparisons of ground motions from five aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake with empirical predictions largely based on data from California.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94(6), 2198–2212.
Yeo, G. L., and Cornell, C. A. (2009a). “Building life-cycle cost analysis due to mainshock and aftershock occurrences.” Struct. Saf., 31(5), 396–408.
Yeo, G. L., and Cornell, C. A. (2009b). “Post-quake decision analysis using dynamic programming.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(1), 79–93.
Yin, Y.-J., and Li, Y. (2010). “Seismic collapse risk of light-frame wood construction considering aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.” Struct. Saf., 32(4), 250–261.
Yu, G., and Adeli, H. (1993). “Object-oriented finite element analysis using EER model.” J. Struct. Eng., 119(9), 2763–2781.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 25Issue 6December 2011
Pages: 504 - 513

History

Received: Apr 6, 2010
Accepted: Oct 19, 2010
Published online: Oct 21, 2010
Published in print: Dec 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yue-Jun Yin, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Engineer, AIR Worldwide, Boston, MA 02116; formerly, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Yue Li, M.ASCE [email protected]
Donald and Rose Ann Tomasini Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share