Application of CFRP Tendons to Novel Connections of Precast Concrete Deck Panels: Experiments and Analytical Models
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 27, Issue 1
Abstract
Carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendons are gaining significant interest in the construction industry owing to their high corrosion resistance. Full-depth precast concrete deck panels (PCDPs) with connections provide advantages for accelerating the construction of superstructures, such as minimizing traffic interruption and improving construction quality. The influences of the connection configuration on the mechanical properties, convenience of construction, and economic cost of PCDPs are the focus issues to be concerned. The poor durability of connection materials also hinders the practical application of full-depth PCDPs. In this paper, a novel high-performance connection for PCDPs was proposed, taking ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) and CFRP strand as grout material and post-tensioned tendon, respectively. The high-performance connection has high strength and durability. Four-point bending experiments were conducted to investigate the flexural performance of PCDPs with the proposed novel connection, including failure mode, moment–deflection curve, capacity, ductility, and working mechanism. Moreover, the numerical simulations were carried out to evaluate the impacts of parameters on the flexural capacity in Abaqus software. An improved analytical model was put forward to predict the balanced CFRP tendon ratio and flexural capacity of PCDPs. The results show that it is ductile-control for the failure mode of PCDPs with high-performance connections. The flexural capacity is significantly improved with the increased quantity of welded studs, initial tendon stress, concrete strength, and anchorage spacing. The proposed connections could effectively promote the behavior and durability of PCDPs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 51838010), the Beijing Municipal Education Commission (IDHT20190504), Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation (Grant No. 2022-zz-090) and the Young Teachers’ Research Ability Enhancement Program of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (Grant No. X22008). These supports are gratefully acknowledged. The results and conclusions presented in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the sponsors.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- Ac,N
- actual projected area of the concrete cone of the single-welded stud with two steel studs;
- projected area of the concrete cone for one stud rod with adequate spacing and edge distance;
- Ac,V
- actual projected area of shear failure area for a welded stud;
- projected area of the shear failure area for a steel stud with adequate spacing and edge distance;
- Af
- total cross-sectional area of CFRP tendons;
- b
- width of PCDPs;
- ccr,N
- minimum edge distance to develop the intact concrete cone;
- cmax
- maximum edge distance;
- cmin
- minimum distance of welded stud to the edge;
- c1
- distance from the loading position to the concrete edge;
- Cc
- compressive force of concrete;
- D
- distance between the studs and specimen center for specimen with two studs;
- Din
- distance between the internal studs and specimen center for specimen with four studs;
- Dout
- distance between the outermost studs and specimen center for specimen with four studs;
- dnom
- diameter of the steel stud;
- Ec
- elasticity modulus of concrete and UHPC;
- Ef
- elasticity modulus of CFRP tendon;
- Es
- elasticity modulus of ordinary reinforcement;
- Ft
- tension provided by the single-welded stud;
- Ft1
- horizontal component from axial force along the direction of the stud rods;
- Ft2
- horizontal component from shear force perpendicular to the stud rods;
- fc
- stress of concrete under compression;
- compressive strength of concrete cylinder;
- fcc,200
- cubic compressive strength of concrete with the length of 200 mm;
- fcu
- cubic concrete compressive strength;
- fc2
- compressive strength of concrete at the top of the connections when it is damaged;
- ffrpt
- stress of CFRP tendon;
- fpu
- fracture stress of the CFRP tendon;
- fs
- tensile stress of ordinary reinforcement;
- tensile strength of concrete and UHPC;
- fy
- yield stress of ordinary reinforcement;
- hef
- effective height of stud;
- hf
- distance from CFRP tendons at the position of the connection to the top of the concrete;
- ht
- distance from welded stud at the position of the connection to the top of the concrete;
- Kc
- ratio of the second stress variant;
- lf
- length of the steel stud;
- L
- anchorage distance;
- M
- moment capacity of PCDPs;
- Mcr
- cracking moment;
- Mmodel
- moment obtained by FE model;
- Ms
- moment capacity of PCDPs with straight post-tensioned CFRP tendons;
- Mtest
- moment obtained by test;
- Mu
- peak moment;
- My
- yield moment;
- n
- quantity of welded studs;
- Nu,c
- axial force along the direction of the stud rods;
- R
- radius of curved post-tensioned CFRP strands;
- smax
- the maximum spacing between two studs;
- Vu,c
- shear force perpendicular to the stud rods;
- xa
- height of the stress diagram from the neutral axis to the point where the concrete stress reaching fc2;
- xc
- depth of the neutral axis in the section;
- y
- height from the neutral axis;
- yc
- distance from the neutral axis to the centroid of concrete compressive force;
- β
- angle between the stud rod and horizontal direction;
- β1
- ratio of the height of the concrete equivalent rectangular stress block to the depth of the neutral axis;
- Δu
- peak deflection;
- Δy
- yield deflection;
- ɛc
- strain of concrete under compression;
- compressive strain of the top concrete when the CFRP tendons present fracture;
- ɛco
- concrete strain corresponding to the maximum stress;
- ɛcu
- ultimate strain of concrete;
- ɛd
- strain at the decompression state;
- ɛf
- strain caused by external loads;
- ɛfrpt
- strain of CFRP tendon;
- ɛfu
- strain of CFRP tendons due to the external forces when the critical state is reached;
- ɛpe
- effective strain caused by the initial prestressing force after all stress losses;
- ɛpu
- ultimate tensile strain in CFRP tendon;
- ɛs
- tensile strain in ordinary reinforcement;
- tensile strain of concrete and UHPC;
- ɛu
- ultimate strain in ordinary reinforcement;
- ɛy
- yield strain in ordinary reinforcement;
- η
- flow potential eccentricity;
- θp
- angle between the CFRP tendon and horizontal direction;
- ρfc
- balanced ratio of CFRP tendon;
- σb0/σc0
- ratio of the initial axial compressive yield stress to the initial uniaxial compressive yield stress;
- σt
- stress of weld stud;
- υ
- Poisson’s ratio; and
- ψ
- dilation angle.
References
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Burke, C. R., and C. W. Dolan. 2001. “Flexural design of prestressed concrete beams using FRP tendons.” PCI J. 46 (2): 76–87. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012001.76.87.
CABP (China Architecture & Building Press). 2012. Standard for test method of concrete structures. GB/T 50152-2012. Beijing: CABP.
CABP (China Architecture & Building Press). 2015. Code for design of concrete structures. GB 50010-2010. Beijing: CABP.
CABP (China Architecture & Building Press). 2019. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties. GB/T 50081-2019. Beijing: CABP.
CBMP (China Building Material Press). 2018. Fundamental characteristics and test methods of ultra-high-performance concrete. T/CCPA 7-2018. Beijing: CBMP.
CCP (China Communications Press). 2018. Specifications for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts. JTG 3362-2018. Beijing: CCP.
CEB-FIP (European committee for concrete-Fédération Internationale de la Précontrainte). 1991. CEB-FIP model code 1990. Paris: Thomas Telford.
Chen, L., and B. A. Graybeal. 2012a. “Modeling structural performance of second-generation ultrahigh-performance concrete Pi-girders.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (4): 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000301.
Chen, L., and B. A. Graybeal. 2012b. “Modeling structural performance of ultrahigh-performance concrete I-girders.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (5): 754–764. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000305.
Eligehausen, R., R. Mallée, and J. F. Silva. 2006. Anchorage in concrete construction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Gartner, A., E. P. Douglas, C. W. Dolan, and H. R. Hamilton. 2011. “Small beam bond test method for CFRP composites applied to concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (1): 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000151.
Hu, M., Z. Jia, Q. Han, Y. Ni, C. Jiao, and P. Long. 2022. “Shear behavior of innovative high-performance joints for precast concrete deck panels.” Eng. Struct. 261: 114307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114307.
Jiao, C. J., W. Sun, G. G. Qin, Y. M. Zhang, and J. Y. Jiang. 2004. “Constitutive equation of SFRHSC under uniaxial compression.” [In Chinese.] J. Southeast Univ. 34 (3): 366–369.
Kara, I. F., A. F. Ashour, and M. A. Koroglu. 2016. “Flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with prestressed near-surface-mounted FRP reinforcements.” Composites, Part B 91: 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.023.
Lai, M. H., and J. C. M. Ho. 2016. “A theoretical axial stress-strain model for circular concrete-filled-steel-tube columns.” Eng. Struct. 125: 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.048.
Li, L., Z. Ma, M. E. Griffey, and R. G. Oesterle. 2010. “Improved longitudinal joint details in decked bulb tees for accelerated bridge construction: Concept development.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000067.
Liu, W. 2005. “Research on mechanism of concrete-filled steel tubes subjected to local compression.” M.S. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ.
Ma, Z. G. J., Q. Cao, C. E. Chapman, E. G. Burdette, and C. E. French. 2012. “Longitudinal joint details with tight bend diameter U-bars.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (6): 815–824.
Nilforoush, R., M. Nilsson, L. Elfgren, J. Ozbolt, J. Hofmann, and R. Eligehausen. 2017. “Influence of surface reinforcement, member thickness and cracked concrete on tensile capacity of anchor bolts.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (6): 1543–1556.
Park, R. 1989. “Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 22 (3): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2018. “Design approach for flexural capacity of concrete T-beams with bonded prestressed and nonprestressed FRP reinforcements.” Compos. Struct. 204: 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.091.
Porter, S. D., J. L. Julander, M. W. Halling, and P. J. Barr. 2012. “Shear testing of precast bridge deck panel transverse connections.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 26 (4): 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000238.
Porter, S. D., J. L. Julander, M. W. Halling, P. J. Barr, H. Boyle, and S. Xing. 2011. “Flexural testing of precast bridge deck panel connections.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (3): 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000173.
Rizkalla, S. H., R. L. Serrette, J. S. Heuvel, and E. K. Attiogbe. 1989. “Multiple shear key connections for precast shear wall panels.” PCI J. 34 (2): 104–120. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011989.104.120.
Roberts, K. S. 2011. “Performance of transverse post-tensioned joints subjected to negative bending and shear stresses on full scale, full depth, precast concrete bridge deck system.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
SIMULIA. 2010. ABAQUS 6.10 analysis user’s manual 6.10-EF. Providence, RI: SIMULIA. (Computer software).
SPC (Standards Press of China). 2010. Metallic materials-tensile testing- part 1: Method of test at room temperature. GB/T 228.1-2010. Beijing: SPC.
Tawadrous, R., and G. Morcous. 2019. “Design of shear pocket connection in full-depth precast concrete deck systems.” Eng. Struct. 179: 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.003.
Turmo, J., G. Ramos, and A. C. Aparicio. 2006. “Shear strength of dry joints of concrete panels with and without steel fibres: Application to precast segmental bridges.” Eng. Struct. 28 (1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.001.
UDOT (Utah Department of Transportation). 2008. Full depth precast concrete deck panel standard drawings. Salt Lake City, UT: UDOT.
Wang, Q. 2013. “Experimental research on mechanical behavior and design method of stud connectors.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ.
Wang, Z. H., X. L. Du, and J. D. Zhan. 2012. “The flexural capacity of concrete beams prestressed with bonded and/or unbonded FRP tendons.” Eng. Mech. 29 (3): 67–74.
Weber, E. D., C. P. Pantelides, and L. D. Reaveley. 2016. “Shear capacity of CFRP posttensioned grouted transverse joints under concentrated loads.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (7): 04016040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000908.
Wells, Z. G., P. J. Barr, and P. H. James. 2013. “Performance of posttensioned curved-strand connections in transverse joints of precast deck panels.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (10): 1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000440.
Xue, W., Y. Tan, and L. Zeng. 2010. “Flexural response predictions of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with prestressed CFRP plates.” Compos. Struct. 92 (3): 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.036.
Yuan, W. Y., Q. Han, Y. L. Bai, X. L. Du, and Q. L. Liu. 2022. “A unified confinement model of FRP-wrapped concrete cylinder.” [In Chinese.] China J. Highway Transp. 35 (2): 146–157.
Youssef, M. H., E. A. Ahmed, and B. Benmokrane. 2019. “Structural behavior of GFRP-RC bridge deck slabs connected with UHPFRC joints under flexure and shear.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (9): 04019092. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001475.
Zhou, Y., X. Wang, L. Sui, F. Xing, Y. Wu, and C. Chen. 2018. “Flexural performance of FRP-plated RC beams using H-type end anchorage.” Compos. Struct. 206: 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.015.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 29, 2022
Accepted: Aug 17, 2022
Published online: Oct 26, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 26, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Carbon fibers
- Concrete
- Connections (structural)
- Decks
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Fiber reinforced polymer
- Fibers
- Flexural strength
- Material mechanics
- Material properties
- Materials engineering
- Polymer
- Precast concrete
- Strength of materials
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Synthetic materials
- Tendons
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Menghan Hu, Zhenlei Jia, Yulong Ni, Qiang Han, Flexural Behavior and Model of Curved Bolt Connections with UHPC Grout and CFRP Tendons for Prefabricated Concrete Panels, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6650, 29, 5, (2024).
- Menghan Hu, Zhenlei Jia, Qiang Han, Li Xu, Chiyu Jiao, Peiheng Long, Experimental Investigation of Precast Bridge Deck Panels with Novel High-Performance Connections under Fatigue Loading, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6325, 28, 11, (2023).