Technical Papers
Jun 23, 2022

Numerical and Analytical Study of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Polymer and Steel Bars

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 5

Abstract

This study presents a numerical model to evaluate the flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) and steel bars. The bond–slip action between the reinforcing bars and the surrounding concrete was considered. The cracking load, yielding load, ultimate flexural capacity, strain development, moment–curvature relationship, and midspan deflection were predicted using the proposed numerical model. The model was compared with the experimental results available in the literature and the theoretical results from the design codes. The equations from the design codes underestimated the cracking load by 7%–9%. The averages of numerical yielding moments without and with a bond were 0.96 and 0.97, respectively. The predicted yielding moment considering the bond behavior was approximate to that of neglecting bond. The predicted ultimate flexural capacity without a bond was 3% higher than the test result, whereas the predicted result with the bond was 1% lower than the experimental result. Both design codes underestimated the mid-span deflection under service loads for hybrid-RC beams. The postyielding deflection and deflection behaviors at the service load level were captured well by the proposed model. A parametric study investigated the effects of the reinforcement arrangement. Beams [with a glass FRP (GFRP) reinforcement ratio of 2.06%] with reinforcements placed in one layer presented the highest ultimate capacity, 19.6% and 14.0% higher than those of GFRP bars placed at the outer and inner layers, respectively. Beams with GFRP bars placed in the outer layer showed the highest deformability index when the GFRP reinforcement ratio was less than 1.75%.

Practical Applications

This study presents a reliable model to simulate the flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) and steel bars. The bond–slip action was considered in the model. ACI 318-19 and CAN/CSA A23.3-19 underestimated the cracking load by 7% and 9%, respectively. In addition to the tensile strength of the concrete and the geometry of the section, the layout of the reinforcement was considered in the proposed model, thus achieving a more accurate prediction of the cracking load. The model without bond stress overestimated the ultimate flexural capacity of compression-controlled members and underestimated the ultimate capacity of tension-controlled members. Both ACI 318-19 and ACI 440.1R-15 underestimated the midspan deflection under service loads for hybrid-RC beams. The strain in FRP bars was highly related to the effective reinforcement ratio based on the strength transform (Lau’s equation) for hybrid-RC beams. For a designed strain limit for the FRP bars, the required effective reinforcement ratio for beams can be obtained from Fig. 9(b). Beams with reinforcements placed in one layer exhibited the highest ultimate capacity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0703000), the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51678430), Shanghai Pujiang Program (Grant No. 12PJ1409000), and the Nantong Science and Technology Program (Grant No. JC2021170).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Acf,eff
effective concrete area of FRP bars (mm2);
Acs,eff
effective concrete area of steel bars (mm2);
Af
area of tensile GFRP bars (mm2);
As
area of tensile steel bars (mm2);
a
shear span of the beam (mm);
af
distance from the bottom surface of the beam to the center of tensile FRP bars (mm);
as
distance from the bottom surface of the beam to the center of tensile steel bars (mm);
as
distance from the top surface of the beam to the center of compressive bars (mm);
b
width of the beam (mm);
c
neutral axis depth (mm);
d
distance from the extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the tensile reinforcement (mm);
Ec
modulus of elasticity of concrete (MPa);
Ef
modulus of elasticity of GFRP bars (MPa);
Es
modulus of elasticity of steel bars (MPa);
Et
tensile modulus of elasticity of concrete (MPa), assumed to be the same as Ec;
fc
cylinder compressive strength of concrete (MPa);
ff
stress of FRP bars when concrete crushing failure occurs (MPa);
ffu
tensile strength of FRP bars (MPa);
ftu
tensile strength of concrete (MPa);
fu
ultimate strength of steel bars (MPa);
fy
yield strength of steel bars (MPa);
h
total depth of the beam (mm);
Icr
moment of inertia of transformed cracked section (mm4);
Icr(1)
moment of inertia of transformed cracked section before steel yielding (mm4);
Icr(2)
moment of inertia of transformed cracked section after steel yielding (mm4);
Ie
effective moment of inertia (mm4);
Ie(2)
effective moment of inertia after steel yielding (mm4);
Ig
moment of inertia of the gross concrete section about the centroidal axis, neglecting reinforcement (mm4);
L
clear span of the beam (mm);
Ma
moment due to the applied load (kN · m);
Mcr
cracking moment (kN · m);
Mcr,e
experimental cracking moment (kN · m);
Mu
ultimate moment capacity (kN · m);
Mu,e
experimental ultimate moment capacity (kN · m);
My
yielding moment (kN · m);
My,e
experimental yielding moment (kN · m);
M0.001
moment at a service limit state with the corresponding concrete strain ɛc = 0.001;
P
applied load (kN);
Sw
average crack spacing at constant moment region (mm);
s
slip (relative displacement between steel and concrete cross-sections);
sf,i
slip of FRP bars at node i;
ss,i
slip of steel bars at node i;
s1
slip corresponding to the peak bond stress;
Uf
perimeter of FRP bars (mm);
Us
perimeter of steel bars (mm);
yt
distance from centroidal axis of gross section, neglecting reinforcement, to tension face (mm);
γ
factor determined by load and boundary conditions;
δi
deflection at node i;
ɛc
compressive strain in concrete;
ɛci
compressive strain in concrete at the ith layer;
ɛco
strain in concrete at maximum compressive stress;
ɛct
concrete strain at the top layer;
ɛcu
ultimate strain in concrete;
ɛf
strain in tensile FRP bars;
ɛfu
design rupture strain of FRP reinforcement;
ɛs
strain in tensile steel bars;
ɛsh
strain at strain hardening for steel bars;
εs
strain in compressive steel bars;
ɛt
tensile strain in concrete;
ɛti
tensile strain in concrete at the ith layer;
ɛtu
tensile strain in concrete at tensile stress of ftu;
ɛu
strain at ultimate stress for steel bars;
ɛy
yield strain in steel bars;
θi
rotation at node i;
λ
modification factor which accounts for the reduced mechanical properties of lightweight concrete compared with normalweight concrete of the same compressive strength;
μ
coefficient determining the decay rate of tensile strength;
μE,Δ
deformability index;
ρeff
effective reinforcement ratio;
ρf
ratio of Af to bd;
ρs
ratio of As to bd;
σc
compressive stress of concrete (MPa);
σcf,i
stress of concrete between the (i − 1)th and ith nodes of FRP bars (MPa);
σcfm,i,i−1
mean stress of concrete between the (i − 1)th and ith nodes of FRP bars (MPa);
σcsm,i,i−1
mean stress of concrete between the (i − 1)th and ith nodes of steel bars (MPa);
σf,i
stress of FRP bars at node i (MPa);
σfm,i,i−1
mean stress of FRP bars between the (i − 1)th and ith nodes (MPa);
σs,i
stress of steel bars at node i (MPa);
σsm,i,i−1
mean stress of steel bars between the (i − 1)th and ith nodes (MPa);
τ
bond stress (MPa);
τf,i
bond stress of FRP bars at node i (MPa);
τmax
peak bond stress for reinforcing bars (MPa);
τs,i
bond stress of steel bars at node i (MPa);
φi
curvature at node i;
φu
curvature at the ultimate limit state; and
φ0.001
curvature at a service limit state with the corresponding concrete strain ɛc = 0.001.

References

Abdelkarim, O. I., E. A. Ahmed, B. Benmokrane, and M.-A. Loranger. 2020. “Design and field testing of a first continuous slab-on-girder bridge with a hybrid GFRP–steel-reinforced bridge deck in Canada.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (8): 04020044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001579.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with FRP bars. ACI 440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ahmed, E. A., F. Settecasi, and B. Benmokrane. 2014. “Construction and testing of GFRP steel hybrid-reinforced concrete bridge-deck slabs of Sainte-Catherine overpass bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (6): 04014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000581.
Aiello, M. A., and L. Ombres. 2002. “Structural performances of concrete beams with hybrid (fiber-reinforced polymer-steel) reinforcements.” J. Compos. Constr. 6 (2): 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(133).
Araba, A. M., and A. F. Ashour. 2018. “Flexural performance of hybrid GFRP-Steel reinforced concrete continuous beams.” Composites, Part B 154: 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.077.
Arafa, A., N. Ahmed, A. S. Farghaly, O. Chaallal, and B. Benmokrane. 2021. “Exploratory study on incorporating glass FRP reinforcement to control damage in steel-reinforced concrete bridge pier walls.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (2): 04020116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001648.
Bencardino, F., A. Condello, and L. Ombres. 2016. “Numerical and analytical modeling of concrete beams with steel, FRP and hybrid FRP-steel reinforcements.” Compos. Struct. 140: 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.045.
Benmokrane, B., E. El-Salakawy, A. El-Ragaby, and S. El-Gamal. 2007. “Performance evaluation of innovative concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with fibre-reinforced-polymer bars.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34 (3): 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-173.
Bentz, E. 2001. “Response-2000 user manual.” Toronto: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto.
Bischoff, P. H. 2005. “Reevaluation of deflection prediction for concrete beams reinforced with steel and fiber reinforced polymer bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (5): 752–767. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(752).
CEB-FIB (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 1990. CEB-FIP model code 1990. Lausanne, Switzerland: CEB-FIB.
Cosenza, E., G. Manfredi, and R. Realfonzo. 1997. “Behavior and modeling of bond of FRP rebars to concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 1 (2): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40).
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Design of concrete structures. CAN/CSA A23.3-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
El-Salakawy, E., B. Benmokrane, A. El-Ragaby, and D. Nadeau. 2005. “Field investigation on the first bridge deck slab reinforced with glass FRP bars constructed in Canada.” J. Compos. Constr. 9 (6): 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:6(470).
El Refai, A., F. Abed, and A. Al-Rahmani. 2015. “Structural performance and serviceability of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 96: 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.063.
Ge, W., J. Zhang, D. Cao, and Y. Tu. 2015. “Flexural behaviors of hybrid concrete beams reinforced with BFRP bars and steel bars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 87: 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.113.
Gribniak, V., A. Perez Caldentey, G. Kaklauskas, A. Rimkus, and A. Sokolov. 2016. “Effect of arrangement of tensile reinforcement on flexural stiffness and cracking.” Eng. Struct. 124: 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.026.
Hognestad, E. 1951. A study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete members. Vol. 49. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois.
Hu, R., Z. Fang, B. Benmokrane, and W. Fang. 2021. “Cyclic behaviour of UHPC columns with hybrid CFRP/steel reinforcement bars.” Eng. Struct. 238 (7): 112245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112245.
Jaeger, L. G., A. A. Mufti, and G. Tadros. 1997. “The concept of the overall performance factor in rectangular-section reinforced concrete members.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. Non-Metallic Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, 551–559. Tokyo: Japan Concrete Institute.
Jakubovskis, R., G. Kaklauskas, V. Gribniak, A. Weber, and M. Juknys. 2014. “Serviceability analysis of concrete beams with different arrangements of GFRP bars in the tensile zone.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (5): 04014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000465.
Kara, I. F., A. F. Ashour, and M. A. Köroğlu. 2015. “Flexural behavior of hybrid FRP/steel reinforced concrete beams.” Compos. Struct. 129: 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.073.
Lau, D., and H. J. Pam. 2010. “Experimental study of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams.” Eng. Struct. 32 (12): 3857–3865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.028.
Leung, H. Y., and R. V. Balendran. 2003. “Flexural behaviour of concrete beams internally reinforced with GFRP rods and steel rebars.” Struct. Surv. 21 (4): 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800310507159.
Lin, X., and Y. X. Zhang. 2014. “Evaluation of bond stress–slip models for FRP reinforcing bars in concrete.” Compos. Struct. 107: 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.037.
Maranan, G. B., A. C. Manalo, B. Benmokrane, W. Karunasena, P. Mendis, and T. Q. Nguyen. 2019. “Flexural behavior of geopolymer-concrete beams longitudinally reinforced with GFRP and steel hybrid reinforcements.” Eng. Struct. 182 (March): 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.073.
Nanni, A., and S. Faza. 2002. “Design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars: An emerging technology.” ACI Concr. Int. 24: 53–58.
Pang, L., W. J. Qu, P. Zhu, and J. J. Xu. 2015. “Design propositions for hybrid FRP-steel reinforced concrete beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (4): 040150864.
Qin, R., A. Zhou, and D. Lau. 2017. “Effect of reinforcement ratio on the flexural performance of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams.” Composites, Part B 108: 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.054.
Qu, W., X. Zhang, and H. Huang. 2009. “Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 13 (5): 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000035.
Ruan, X., C. Lu, K. Xu, G. Xuan, and M. Ni. 2020. “Flexural behavior and serviceability of concrete beams hybrid-reinforced with GFRP bars and steel bars.” Compos. Struct. 235: 111772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111772.
Safan, M. A. 2013. “Flexural behavior and design of steel-GFRP reinforced concrete beams.” ACI Mater. J. 110 (6): 677–685.
Tan, K. H. 1997. “Behavior of hybrid FRP-steel reinforced concrete beams.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Non-Metallic Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, 487–494.
Tang, W. C., R. V. Balendran, A. Nadeem, and H. Y. Leung. 2006. “Flexural strengthening of reinforced lightweight polystyrene aggregate concrete beams with near-surface mounted GFRP bars.” Build. Environ. 41 (10): 1381–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.029.
Wang, X., S. Liu, Y. Shi, Z. Wu, and W. He. 2022. “Integrated high-performance concrete beams reinforced with hybrid BFRP and steel bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (1): 04021235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003207.
Xingyu, G., D. Yiqing, and J. Jiwang. 2020. “Flexural behavior investigation of steel-GFRP hybrid-reinforced concrete beams based on experimental and numerical methods.” Eng. Struct. 206: 110117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110117.
Xu, J., P. Zhu, Z. J. Ma, and W. Qu. 2019. “Fatigue flexural analysis of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid GFRP and steel bars.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109635.
Yoon, Y. S., J. M. Yang, K. H. Min, and H. O. Shin. 2011. “Flexural strength and deflection characteristics of high-strength concrete beams with hybrid FRP and steel bar reinforcement.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 10th Int. Symp. on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, 57–77. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
Zhou, B., R.-Y. Wu, J. Feng, and S. Yin. 2020. “Modeling of tensile behavior of hybrid GFRP-steel reinforced concrete chords.” Compos. Struct. 236: 111853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111853.
Zhu, P., J. Xu, W. Qu, and H. Hao. 2017. “Experimental study of fatigue flexural performance of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid GFRP and steel bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (5): 04017036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000817.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 5October 2022

History

Received: Aug 25, 2021
Accepted: Apr 7, 2022
Published online: Jun 23, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 23, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, School of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Nantong Univ., Nantong 226019, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., 1239 Siping Rd., Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., 1239 Siping Rd., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Making a Case for Hybrid GFRP-Steel Reinforcement System in Concrete Beams: An Overview, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app13031463, 13, 3, (1463), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share