Technical Papers
Dec 14, 2021

Comparing Testing Methods of Partially Composite Sandwich Wall Panel Glass Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Connectors

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 1

Abstract

Precast concrete insulated sandwich wall panels have been commonly used as exterior load bearing or cladding wall panels on building structures. These panels are usually designed as composite, partially composite, or noncomposite, depending on the strength of the shear connectors connecting the two exterior concrete wythes. Various proprietary available shear connectors are used to achieve the required degree of composite action. The design information of the shear connectors is provided by the connector supplier based on testing results. Currently, there is no universally accepted method of testing composite shear connectors in practice or in the literature, however, connector suppliers usually use one of two testing methodologies recommended by the International Code Council–Evaluation Service, namely, AC320 or AC422, respectively. It is not known which test provides a better measurement of design values such as strength and stiffness, and there is no such comparison in the literature. In this study, 68 pushoff experiments were presented to evaluate the difference between these two testing methodologies. The testing program consisted of 20 single shear specimens and 48 double shear specimens. Three different commercially available shear connectors were used as well as variable insulation wythe thicknesses. The results were statistically analyzed. Large differences in the measured connectors’ shear strengths and stiffness were observed between the two testing methods, with AC422 providing consistently larger ultimate shear and secant stiffness, but considerably more variability. Large-scale flexural specimens from the literature were modeled using AC320 and AC422 as-measured results, and AC422 tests were found to predict deflections, cracking, and strength more accurately. It was concluded that AC422 produces a more accurate measure of connector properties, but suffers from large variability, resulting in a recommendation that further investigation into changing testing parameters and/or methods is warranted to reduce this variability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of the wythe connector suppliers represented by this research and their permission to compile and present these results. The authors do not endorse any wythe connector type or configuration and make no statement as to which may perform better or worse. Thanks to Mahmut Ekenel at ICC-ES for his discussions and background information.

References

Al-Rubaye, S. 2017. “Experimental and simplified analytical investigation of full-scale sandwich panel walls.” Accessed December 25, 2019. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6825.
Al-Rubaye, S., J. Olsen, T. Sorensen, and M. Maguire. 2018. “Evaluating elastic behavior for partially composite precast concrete sandwich wall panels.” PCI J. 63 (5): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij63.5-04.
Al-Rubaye, S., T. Sorensen, and M. Maguire. 2017. “Investigating composite action at ultimate for commercial sandwich panel composite connectors.” In PCI Convention and National Bridge Conf. Cleveland: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
Al-Rubaye, S., T. Sorensen, R. J. Thomas, and M. Maguire. 2019. “Generalized beam–spring model for predicting elastic behavior of partially composite concrete sandwich wall panels.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109533.
ASTM. 2018a. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindricalconcrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018b. Standard test methods for strength of anchors in concrete elements. ASTM E488-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Cox, B., P. Syndergaard, S. Al-Rubaye, F. F. Pozo-Lora, R. Tawadrous, and M. Maguire. 2019. “Lumped GFRP star connector system for partial composite action in insulated precast concrete sandwich panels.” Compos. Struct. 229: 111465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111465.
Einea, A., D. Salmon, M. K. Tadros, and T. Culp. 1994. “A new structurally and thermally efficient precast sandwich panel system.” PCI J. 39 (4): 90–101. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011994.90.101.
Ekenel, M. 2014. “Testing and acceptance criteria for fiber-reinforced composite grid connectors used in concrete sandwich panels.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (6): 06014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000915.
Gombeda, M. J., C. J. Naito, and S. E. Quiel. 2020. “Development and performance of a ductile shear tie for precast concrete insulated wall panels.” J. Build. Eng. 28: 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101084.
Gombeda, M. J., P. Trasborg, C. J. Naito, and S. E. Quiel. 2017. “Simplified model for partially-composite precast concrete insulated wall panels subjected to lateral loading.” Eng. Struct. 138: 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.065.
Holmberg, A., and E. Plem. 1965. Behavior of load-bearing sandwich-type structures. Stockholm, Sweden: Statens Institut for Byggnadsforskning.
ICC-ES (International Code Council Evaluation Service). 2010. Acceptance criteria for semi-continuous fiber-reinforced grid connectors used in combination with rigid insulation in concrete sandwich panel construction. AC422. Washington, DC: ICC.
ICC-ES (International Code Council Evaluation Service). 2015. Acceptance criteria for fiber-reinforced polymer composite or unreinforced polymer connectors anchored in concrete. AC320. Washington, DC: ICC.
ISO (International Standard Organization). 2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 1–30. ISO/IEC 17025. Geneva: ISO.
Jensen, K., S. Al-Rubaye, R. J. Thomas, and M. Maguire. 2020. “Mechanics-based model for elastic bending, axial, thermal deformations, and asymmetry of concrete composite sandwich wall panels.” Structures 23: 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.11.004.
Jiang, H., Z. Guo, J. Liu, and H. Liu. 2018. “The shear behavior of precast concrete sandwich panels with W-shaped SGFRP shear connectors.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (10): 3961–3971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0809-9.
Kinnane, O., R. West, M. Grimes, and J. Grimes. 2014. “Shear capacity of insulated precast concrete façade panels.” In CERI - Civil Engineering Research Ireland. Belfast, UK: Queen’s Univ.
Maguire, M., and F. F. Pozo-Lora. 2020. “Partially composite insulated wall panels: What is percent composite.” Concr. Int. 42: 47–52.
Maximos, H. N., W. A. Pong, M. K. Tadros, and L. D. Martin. 2007. Behavior and design of composite precast prestressed concrete sandwich panels with NU-Tie. Final Rep. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Naito, C., J. Hoemann, M. Beacraft, and B. Bewick. 2012. “Performance and characterization of shear ties for use in insulated precast concrete sandwich wall panels.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000430.
Newmark, N. M., C. P. Siess, and I. M. Viest. 1951. “Tests and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction.” Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Stress Analysis. 9 (1): 75–92.
Nowak, A., and K. Collins. 2012. Reliability of structures. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Olsen, J., S. Al-Rubaye, T. Sorensen, and M. Maguire. 2017. Developing a general methodology for evaluating composite action in insulation wall panels. Report. Chicago, IL: PCI.
Olsen, J., and M. Maguire. 2016. “Shear testing of precast concrete sandwich wall panel composite shear connectors.” In PCI National Bridge Conf. Chicago, IL: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2011. Vol. 56 of State of the art of precast/prestressed concrete sandwich wall panels. 2nded., 131–176. Prepared by PCI Committee on Precast Sandwich Wall Panels. Chicago, IL: PCI.
Pozo-Lora, F., and M. Maguire. 2019. “Thermal bowing testing of precast concrete sandwich wall panels.” Accessed June 4, 2019. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cee_facpub/3621.
Pozo-Lora, F., and M. Maguire. 2020. “Thermal bowing of concrete sandwich panels with flexible shear connectors.” J. Build. Eng. 29: 101124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101124.
Salmon, D. C., A. Einea, M. K. Tadros, and T. D. Culp. 1997. “Full scale testing of precast concrete sandwich panels.” ACI Struct. J 94: 354–362. https://doi.org/10.14359/486.
Sorensen, T., S. Dorafshan, and M. Maguire. 2017. “Thermal evaluation of common locations of heat loss in sandwich wall panels.” In 17th Int. Conf. on Cold Regions Engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE.https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784481011.017.
Syndergaard, P. 2018. Comparing sandwich wall panel shear connector testing methodologies. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ.
Tawadrous, R. 2017. Design of shear pocket connections in full-depth precast concrete bridge deck systems. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Teixeira, N., D. G. Tomlinson, and A. Fam. 2016. “Precast concrete sandwich wall panels with bolted angle connections tested in flexure under simulated wind pressure and suction.” PCI J 61 (4): 65–83.
Tomlinson, D. G., N. Teixeira, and A. Fam. 2016. “New shear connector design for insulated concrete sandwich panels using basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” J. Compos. Constr 20 (4): 04016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000662.
Woltman, G., D. Tomlinson, and A. Fam. 2013. “Investigation of various GFRP shear connectors for insulated precast concrete sandwich wall panels.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (5): 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000373.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 1February 2022

History

Received: Feb 2, 2021
Accepted: Oct 15, 2021
Published online: Dec 14, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 14, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Parker Syndergaard, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Engineer, Calder Richards Structural Consulting Engineers, 634 400 W, Salt Lake City, UT. Email: [email protected]
Senior Structural Engineer, EConstruct, Florida, Orlando, FL. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9742-5467. Email: [email protected]
Salam Al-Rubaye, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-0344. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Flexural Behavior of Insulated Concrete Sandwich Panels using FRP-Jacketed Steel-Composite Connectors, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 10.1155/2022/6160841, 2022, (1-25), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share