Case Studies
Apr 17, 2020

Experimental Evaluation of Internally Pressurized GFRP Pipes Subjected to Vertical Ground Slip

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 24, Issue 4

Abstract

While glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) tubes have emerged as a corrosion-resistant alternative to buried steel pipelines, they are not as well understood or widely used. This study examines the response of ±55° angle-ply filament-wound GFRP pipes to ground deformations in the form of vertical fault offset. Full-scale tests were conducted on 5.65-m-long buried pipes of 141-mm diameter (D) and 4.1-mm wall thickness (t), with internal pressures of 300 and 1,000 kPa, and results were compared with an identical unpressurized pipe from a separate study. A special 7.3 × 1.8 × 1.8-m split-box apparatus able to simulate a vertical fault plane at the midlength of the pipe with up to 120-mm offset was employed. Strain gauges and optical fibers were used to construct lengthwise and circumferential strain profiles. The GFRP pipes withstood a fault offset of 110 mm (0.8D) before failing in the form of pressure loss due to pipe weeping after GFRP matrix cracking. The total length of the pipe subjected to curvature and bending was only 2.85 m (20D) in the vicinity of the fault, a length apparently independent of fault offset and internal pressure. The maximum curvature occurred on the stationary side, about 1.4D–2D from the fault line. This curvature was 43%–70% higher than the peak curvature on the moving side. The internal pressure of 1,000 kPa resulted in 25% and 35% reductions in peak curvatures at the stationary and moving sides, respectively. Upon excavation, tension failure was apparent at the crown (the point at the top of the circular pipe cross section) on the stationary side of the pipe, and compression failure, also at the crown, was observed on the moving side. These locations correspond to the estimated locations of peak curvature.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Almahakeri, M., A. Fam, and I. D. Moore. 2013. “Longitudinal bending and failure of GFRP pipes buried in dense sand under relative ground movement.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (5): 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000340.
Bakaiyan, H., H. Hosseini, and E. Ameri. 2009. “Analysis of multi-layered filament-wound composite pipes under combined internal pressure and thermomechanical loading with thermal variations.” Compos. Struct. 88 (4): 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.05.017.
Brazier, L. G. 1927. “On the flexure of thin cylindrical shells and other “thin” sections.” Proc. R. Soc. A 116 (773): 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0125.
CEPA (Canadian Energy Pipeline Association). 2016. 2016 Pipeline industry performance report. Calgary, AB: CEPA.
Faria, H., and R. M. Guedes. 2010. “Long-term behaviour of GFRP pipes: Reducing the prediction test duration.” Polym. Test. 29 (3): 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.12.008.
Ha, D., T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2008. “Buried high-density polyethylene pipelines subjected to normal and strike-slip faulting—A centrifuge investigation.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (12): 1733–1742. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-089.
Jalali, H. H., F. R. Rofooei, N. K. A. Attari, and M. Samadian. 2016. “Experimental and finite element study of the reverse faulting effects on buried continuous steel gas pipelines.” Soil Dynam. Earthquake Eng. 86: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.006.
Karamitros, D. K., G. D. Bouckovalas, and G. P. Kouretzis. 2007. “Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike–slip fault crossings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (3): 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.08.001.
Lu, C., and A. Fam. 2020. “The effect of tube damage on flexural strength of ±55° angle-ply concrete-filled FRP tubes.” Constr. Build. Mater. 240: 117948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117948.
Ni, P. 2016. Nonlinear soil-structure interaction for buried. Kingston, ON: Queen’s Univ.
O’Rourke, M. J., and X. Liu. 1999. Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects. New York: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
O’Rourke, T. D., S. S. Jeon, S. Toprak, M. Cubrinovski, M. Hughes, S. Van Ballegooy, and D. Bouziou. 2014. “Earthquake response of underground pipeline networks in Christchurch, NZ.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1193/030413EQS062M.
Poon, E. 2015. Vitrified clay pipe joint behaviour under differential ground movement. Kingston, ON: Queen’s Univ.
Saiyar, M., P. Ni, W. A. Take, and I. D. Moore. 2016. “Response of pipelines of differing flexural stiffness to normal faulting.” Géotechnique 66 (4): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.14.P.175.
Soden, P. D., R. Kitching, and P. C. Tse. 1989. “Experimental failure stresses for ±55° filament wound glass fibre reinforced plastic tubes under biaxial loads.” Composites 20 (2): 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(89)90640-X.
Tognon, A. R., R. K. Rowe, and R. W. I. Brachman. 1999. “Evaluation of side wall friction for a buried pipe testing facility.” Geotext. Geomembr. 17 (4): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(99)00004-7.
Trifonov, O. V., and V. P. Cherniy. 2014. “Analysis of stress–strain state in a steel pipe strengthened with a composite wrap.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 136 (5): 051202. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027229.
Trifonov, O. V., and V. P. Cherniy. 2016. “Application of composite wraps for strengthening of buried steel pipelines crossing active faults.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 138 (6): 060902. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032915.
Wang, B., X. Li, and J. Zhou. 2011. “Strain analysis of buried steel pipelines across strike-slip faults.” J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 18 (5): 1654–1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-011-0885-1.
Williams, J. H. H. 2018. “The response of glass fibre reinforced polymer pipe subject to longitudinal bending in the form of vertical ground deformation.” M.A.Sc thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 24Issue 4August 2020

History

Received: Oct 28, 2019
Accepted: Dec 30, 2019
Published online: Apr 17, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 17, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hendrik Williams [email protected]
M.A.Sc. Student, GeoEngineering Centre, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., 58 Univ. Ave., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Donald and Sarah Munro Chair, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., 58 Univ. Ave., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org.0000-0003-4318-0091. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Infrastructure Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., 58 Univ. Ave., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share