Technical Papers
Oct 2, 2014

Durability of Bridge Deck with FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms under Freeze-Thaw Cycles

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 19, Issue 4

Abstract

This study examines the effect of aggressive freeze-thaw (FT) cyclic exposure on strength and integrity of bridge decks built using glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) stay-in-place (SIP) structural forms that completely replace the bottom rebar layers. The concern has been whether entrapped moisture may cause frost-jacking of the form, negatively impacting deck integrity. Eleven scaled deck specimens were built, each using two flat GFRP plates with T-shape ribs running normal to girders. Both plates spanned the gap between girders and were spliced by overlapping, directly under the load. The study simulated the following surface treatments of the form: no treatment at all, adhesive bond to freshly cast concrete, and coarse aggregates bonded to the forms. Also, unbonded and bonded lap splices of the forms were tested. The decks were subjected to three cracking load cycles before being saturated and subjected to up to 300 FT cycles at +5 to 18°C core temperatures. Freezing was in air while thawing was by water. Some specimens were thawed without being submerged and one specimen had perforated forms for drainage. Specimens of various splice and surface treatments survived the 300 FT cycles. Subsequent testing showed no reduction in ultimate load or stiffness, relative to control specimens, despite the 23% reduction in tensile strength and 11% in modulus of GFRP coupons exposed to the 300 FT cycles. This is because failure of the decks was governed by concrete punching shear. Decks with untreated forms and unbonded splices showed 21% lower capacity than treated and bonded ones, even without any FT exposure, but this lower capacity was still 3.9 times higher than the equivalent design truck service load at this scale.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) for funding this project. Special thanks go to MTO Engineers Mrs. David Lai and Kris Mermigas for their support and advice. The authors also acknowledge in-kind support provided by Fiberline Composites Inc, Trancells-Pultrall Canada, and Sika Canada, Inc.

References

AASHTO. (2007). “AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications.” SI units, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Alagusundaramoorthy, P., Harik, I. E., and Choo, C. C. (2006). “Structural behavior of FRP composite bridge deck panels.” J. Bridge Eng., 384–393.
ASTM. (1997). “Standard test method for resistance of concrete to rapid freezing and thawing.” C666-97, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA, 314–319.
ASTM. (2008). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” D3039/D3039M-08, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C39, West Conshohocken, PA.
Berg, A. C., Bank, L. C., Oliva, M. G., and Russell, J. S. (2005). “Construction and cost analysis of an FRP reinforced concrete bridge deck.” Constr. Build. Mater., 20(8), 515–526.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006). S6-06, Canadian highway bridge design code, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Cheng, L., and Karbhari, V. M. (2006). “Fatigue behavior of a steel-free FRP–concrete modular bridge deck system.” J. Bridge Eng., 474–488.
Dutta, P. K. (1988). “Structural fiber composite materials for cold regions.” J. Cold Reg. Eng., 124–134.
Fam, A., and Nelson, M. (2012). “New bridge deck cast onto corrugated GFRP stay-in-place structural forms with interlocking connections.” J. Compos. Constr., 110–117.
Green, M. F., Bisby, L. A., Beaudoin, Y., and Labossière, P. (2000). “Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the bond durability between fibre reinforced polymer plate reinforcement and concrete.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 27(5), 949–959.
Matta, F., Nanni, A., Ringelstetter, T. E., and Bank, L. C. (2006). “Rapid construction for concrete bridge deck using prefabricated FRP reinforcement.” 3rd Int. Conf. on Composites in Civil Engineering, CICE 2006, India Infrastructure Finance Company (IIFC), 151–154.
Nelson, M., Beriker, E., and Fam, A. (2014a). “Splices of FRP stay-in-place structural forms in concrete bridge decks.” J. Compos. Constr., 18(4), 04014001.
Nelson, M., Eldridge, A., and Fam, A. (2013). “The effects of splices and bond on performance of bridge deck with FRP stay-in-place forms at various boundary conditions.” Eng. Struct., 56, 509–516.
Nelson, M., and Fam, A. (2013). “Structural GFRP permanent forms with T-shape ribs for bridge decks supported by precast concrete girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 813–826.
Nelson, M., and Fam, A. (2014). “Full bridge testing at scale constructed with novel FRP stay-in-place structural forms for concrete deck.” Constr. Build. Mater., 50, 368–376.
Nelson, M. S., et al. (2014b). “FRP stay-in-place structural forms for concrete bridge decks: A state-of-the-art review.” ACI Struct. J., 111(5), 1069–1079.
Oliva, M., Bae, H., Bank, L., Russell, J., Carter, J., and Becker, S. (2007). “Design and construction of a reinforcement free concrete bridge deck on precast bulb tee girders.” Proc., PCI National Bridge Conf., Phoenix, AZ, 21–24.
Reising, R. M. W., Shahrooz, B. M., Hunt, V., Neumann, A. R., and Helmicki, A. J. (2004). “Performance comparison of four fiber-reinforced polymer deck panels.” J. Compos. Constr., 265–274.
Richardson, P., Nelson, M., and Fam, A. (2014). “Fatigue behavior of concrete bridge decks cast on GFRP stay-in-place structural forms.” J. Compos. Constr., A4013010.
Ringelstetter, T., Bank, L., Oliva, M., Russel, J., Matta, F., and Nanni, A. (2006). “Development of a cost-effective structural FRP stay-in-place formwork system for accelerated and durable bridge deck construction.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 19Issue 4August 2015

History

Received: May 16, 2014
Accepted: Aug 13, 2014
Published online: Oct 2, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 2, 2015
Published in print: Aug 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Raouf Boles
Master’s Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada.
Mark Nelson
Former Doctoral Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada.
Amir Fam, M.ASCE [email protected]
Donald and Sarah Munro Chair Professor in Engineering and Applied Science, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share