Fatigue Behavior of Concrete Bridge Decks Cast on GFRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 18, Issue 3
Abstract
The fatigue performance of concrete bridge decks with glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) stay-in-place structural forms replacing the bottom layer of rebar is studied. The forms were either flat plate with T-up ribs joined using lap splices or corrugated forms joined through pin-and-eye connections. The decks were supported by simulated precast girders, AASHTO Type III, spaced at 1,775 mm. Two surface preparations were examined for each GFRP form, either using adhesive coating that bonds to freshly cast concrete, or just cleaning the surface before casting. For the bonded deck with flat-ribbed forms, adhesive bond and mechanical fasteners were used at the lap splice, whereas lap splice of the unbonded deck had no adhesive or mechanical fasteners. All decks survived 3 million cycles at 123 kN service load of the CL625 design truck of the Canadian standard. The bonded flat-ribbed-form deck further survived additional 2 million cycles at a higher load simulating a larger girder spacing of 2,365 mm. Stiffness degradations were 9–33% with more reduction in unbonded specimens. Nonetheless, live load deflections of all specimens remained below . The residual ultimate strengths after fatigue were reduced by 5% and 27% for the flat-ribbed and corrugated forms, respectively. However, these strengths remain 7 and 3 times higher than service load, respectively. Both the lap-splice and pin-and-eye connection survived fatigue. Concrete crack width at the top surface over the girders remained below the AASHTO limit of 0.3 mm.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) and the in-kind contributions of Zellcomp Inc.
References
AASHTO. (2007). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, SI Units, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Alagusundaramoorthy, P., Harik, I. E., and Choo, C. C. (2006). “Structural behavior of FRP composite bridge deck panels.” J. Bridge Eng., 384–393.
ASTM. (2010a). “Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products.” A370, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010b). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C39/C39M, West Conshohocken, PA.
Canadian Standards Association. (2006). “Canadian highway bridge design code.” CAN/CSA-S6-06, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Cheng, L., and Karbhari, V. M. (2006). “Fatigue behavior of a steel-free FRP-concrete modular bridge deck system.” J. Bridge Eng., 474–488.
Dieter, D. A., Dietsche, J. S., Bank, L. C., Oliva, M. G., and Russell, J. S. (2002). “Concrete bridge decks constructed with fiber-reinforced polymer stay-in-place forms and grid reinforcing.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 219–226.
Fam, A., and Nelson, M. (2012). “A new bridge deck cast onto corrugated GFRP stay-in-place structural forms with interlocking connections.” J. Compos. Constr., 110–117.
Hall, J. E., and Mottram, J. T. (1998). “Combined FRP reinforcement and permanent formwork for concrete members.” J. Compos. Constr., 78–86.
Hayes, M., Ohanehi, D., Lesko, J., Cousins, T., and Witcher, D. (2000). “Performance of tube and plate fiberglass composite bridge deck.” J. Compos. Constr., 48–55.
Honickman, H., and Fam, A. (2009). “Investigating a structural form system for concrete girders using commercially available GFRP sheet-pile sections.” J. Compos. Constr., 455–465.
Kwon, S. C., Dutta, P. K., and Lopez-Anido, R. (2003). “Comparison of the fatigue behaviours of FRP bridge decks and reinforced concrete conventional decks under extreme environment conditions.” KSME Int. J., 17(1), 1–10.
Matta, F., Nanni, A., Ringelstetter, T. E., and Bank, L. C. (2006). “Rapid construction of concrete bridge deck using prefabricated FRP reinforcement.” Proc., Third Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE 2006), Miami, Fl, 151–154.
Nelson, M., and Fam, A. (2012). “Structural GFRP permanent forms with T-shape ribs for bridge decks supported by precast concrete girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 18(9), 813–826.
Saiedi, R., Fam, A., and Green, M. (2011). “Behavior of CFRP-prestressed concrete beams under high-cycle fatigue at low temperature.” J. Compos. Constr., 482–489.
Schlafli, M., and Bruhwiler, E. (1998). “Fatigue of existing reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs.” Eng. Struct., 20(11), 991–998.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 13, 2013
Accepted: Aug 6, 2013
Published online: Aug 8, 2013
Discussion open until: Apr 25, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.