TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 23, 2009

Investigating a Structural Form System for Concrete Girders Using Commercially Available GFRP Sheet-Pile Sections

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 13, Issue 5

Abstract

This paper presents a new girder consisting of a trapezoidal pultruded glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) hat-shaped section commercially available as a sheet pile, but used in this study as a structural form for concrete. It can also offer continuity in the transverse direction through a pin-and-eye connection. Five 610mm×325mm and 3,300-mm-long girders were tested in flexure to examine different bond systems, voided and solid concrete cores, and the performance in positive and negative bending. Bond systems were wet adhesive bond to freshly cast concrete, adhesively bonded coarse aggregates, and mechanical shear studs. No slip was observed between concrete and the GFRP section until delamination failure occurred within a thin layer of cement mortar that remained attached to GFRP. The studs failed by pull out from the concrete flange. In general, 47–75% of the full strengths of concrete and GFRP were reached at ultimate bond failure. Wet adhesive bonding was the simplest and quickest to apply, while resulting in a comparable strength to other systems. A “moment-curvature” analytical model, incorporating a robust bond failure criterion, was developed, validated, and used in a parametric study. It showed that varying the concrete compressive strength or thickness of the GFRP section has insignificant effect on the bond failure load. Also, there are critical values for shear span-to-depth ratio, shear strength of cement mortar, concrete strength, and width of the top GFRP flange, beyond which, the desired flexural failure mode would precede bond failure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers acknowledge the financial support of ISIS Canada research network. The writers are also grateful to David Tryon, Mark Nelson, and Elena Khazova at Queen’s University for their valuable assistance during the experimental program.

References

ASTM. (2008). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C39/C39M-05E1, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2005). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” D3039/D3039M, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Badie, S., Baishya, M., and Tadros, M. (1998). “NUDECK—A new prestressed stay-in-place concrete panel for bridge decks.” Proc., 1998 Transportation Conf., Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa.
Bank, L. C., Oliva, M. G., Bae, H. U., Barker, J. W., and Yoo, S. W. (2007). “Pultruded FRP plank as formwork and reinforcement for concrete members.” Adv. Struct. Eng., 10(5), 525–535.
Berg, A. C., Bank, L. C., Oliva, M. G., and Russell, J. S. (2004). “Construction of a FRP reinforced bridge deck on US Highway 151 in Wisconsin.” Proc., 83rd Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting (CD-ROM), Washington, D.C., 25.
Canadian Standards Association. (1994). “Design of concrete structures.” CSA standard A23.3-94, Toronto.
Cheng, L., and Karbhari, V. M. (2006). “New bridge systems using FRP composites and concrete: A state-of-the-art review.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 8, 143–154.
Collins, M., and Mitchell, D. (1987). Prestressed concrete basics, Canadian Prestressed Concrete Institute, Ottawa.
Deskovic, N., Triantafillou, T. C., and Meier, U. (1995). “Innovative design of FRP combined with concrete: Short-term behavior.” J. Struct. Eng., 121(7), 1069–1078.
Dieter, D. A., Dietsche, J. S., Bank, L. C., Olivia, M. G., and Russel, J. S. (2002). “Concrete bridge decks constructed with fibre-reinforced polymer stay-in-place forms and grid reinforcing.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1814, 219–226.
Fam, A., Mandal, S., and Rizkalla, S. (2005). “Rectangular filament-wound GFRP tubes filled with concrete under flexural and axial loading: Analytical modeling.” J. Compos. Constr., 9(1), 34–43.
Fam, A., and Skutezky, T. (2006). “Composite T-beams using reduced scale rectangular FRP tubes and concrete slabs.” J. Compos. Constr., 10(2), 172–181.
Fardis, M. N., and Khalili, H. (1981). “Concrete encased in fibreglass-reinforced plastic.” ACI Struct. J., 78, 440–446.
GangaRao, V. S. H., and Siva, R. V. H. (2002). “Advances in fibre-reinforced polymer composite bridge decks.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 4(2), 161–168.
Hall, J. E., and Mottram, J. T. (1998). “Combined FRP reinforcement and permanent formwork for concrete members.” J. Compos. Constr., 2(2), 78–86.
Harik, I., et al. (1999). “Testing of concrete/FRP composite deck panels.” Proc., 5th Construction Materials Congress, ASCE, Reston, Va., 351–358.
Hegemier, G., Arya, S., Krishnamoorthy, G., Nachbar, W., and Furgeson, R. (1978). “On the behavior of joints in concrete masonry.” Proc., North American Masonry Conf., Boulder, Colo., 4/1–4/21.
Honickman, H. (2008). “Pultruded GFRP sections as stay-in-place structural open formwork for concrete slabs and girders.” MS thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., 201.
Keller, T., Schaumann, E., and Valee, T. (2006). “Hybrid FRP-concrete sandwich bridge deck.” Proc., Third Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE 2006), Miami, 351–354.
Kluge, R. W., and Sawyer, H. A. (1975). “Interacting pretensioned concrete form panels for bridge decks.” PCI J., 20(3), 34–61.
Kuennen T. (2006). “Transportation officials weigh SIP bridge forms, laud FRP design.” Rep. Prepared for Transportation Research Board.
Matta, F., Galati, N., and Nanni, A. (2005). “Pultruded grid and stay-in-place form panels for the rapid construction of bridge decks.” Proc., Composites 2005, American Composites Manufacturers Association Convention and Trade Show, Columbus, Ohio.
Pluijm, R. V. D. (1993). “Shear behaviour of bed joints.” Proc., North American Masonry Conf., Philadelphia, 125–136.
Prestressed Concrete Institute. (2001). “Stay-in-place deck panels.” PCI bridge design manual, Chap. 16.2.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 13Issue 5October 2009
Pages: 455 - 465

History

Received: Oct 21, 2008
Accepted: Mar 20, 2009
Published online: Mar 23, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hart Honickman
Formerly, MS Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston ON, Canada K7L 3N6.
Amir Fam, M.ASCE
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Innovative and Retrofitted Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share