Technical Papers
Sep 14, 2022

Probability Analysis of Aberrant Ship Collision with Sea-Crossing Bridges Considering Wind and Current

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 11

Abstract

The worldwide occurrence of numerous ship–bridge collisions has prompted a substantial concern regarding the safety of sea-crossing bridges. The majority of conventional risk models for ship–bridge collisions assume that collisions occur in inland waterways instead of sea waterways. Therefore, a new probability model should be established to assess the risks of ship–bridge collisions in sea waterways, considering the harsh navigation conditions such as strong wind and turbulent current in sea waterways. This study proposed a new risk assessment method to evaluate the collision probability of a ship with a sea-crossing bridge. Additionally, the motion state of a ship under the coupling effect of wind and current was analyzed to optimize the new probability model, and the drift trajectory of an aberrant ship was obtained. Moreover, the proposed model was applied to analyze the annual frequency of ship collisions at the Zhoushan-Daishan Sea-crossing Bridge in the East China Sea. For large tonnage ships, the annual frequency of ship collision was higher when calculated using the probability model based on the AASHTO Guide than that evaluated using the current model, whereas a significantly larger collision frequency was computed by the proposed model for small tonnage ships. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between navigation circumstances and the annual frequency of ship collision. The findings of this study will assist in appropriately assessing the risks of ship–bridge collisions for ships navigating through sea-crossing bridges under the influence of wind and current and provide a feasible method for improving the design and management of sea-crossing bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078461, U1709207) and the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2019C03098).

References

Aarsatter, K. G., and T. Moan. 2009. “Estimating navigation patterns from AIS.” J. Navig. 62 (4): 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463309990129.
AASHTO. 2009. Guide specification and commentary for vessel collision design of highway bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Alfi, A., A. Shokrzadeh, and M. Asadi. 2015. “Reliability analysis of H-infinity control for a container ship in way-point tracking.” Appl. Ocean Res. 52: 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2015.07.004.
Bae, Y. G., and S. L. Lee. 2013. “Ship collision risk assessment and sensitivity analysis for sea-crossing bridges.” [In Korea.] J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 33 (5): 1753–1763. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.5.1753.
Chen, C., S. Shiotani, and K. Sasa. 2013. “Numerical ship navigation based on weather and ocean simulation.” Ocean Eng. 69 (9): 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.019.
CMDC (China Meteorological Data Service Center). 2021. Dataset of daily surface observation values in individual years in China. Beijing: CMDC.
Consolazio, G. R., M. T. Davidson, and D. J. Getter. 2010. Vessel crushing and structural collapse relationships for bridge design. Gainesville, FL: Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/research/reports/fdot-bdk75-977-02-rpt.pdf.
Gholipour, G., C. Zhang, and A. A. Mousavi. 2020. “Nonlinear numerical analysis and progressive damage assessment of a cable-stayed bridge pier subjected to ship collision.” Mar. Struct. 69: 102662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.102662.
Goerlandt, F., and P. Kujala. 2011. “Traffic simulation-based ship collision probability modeling.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 96 (1): 91–107. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.003.
Guo, J. 2010. “Current principal technique status and challenges to be confronted in construction of sea-crossing bridges.” [In Chinese.] Bridge Constr. 6: 66–69.
Guo, J., D. Hang, and X. J. Zhu. 2020. “Prediction of crack propagation in U-rib components based on the Markov Chain.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (10): 04020089. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001624.
Guo, J., and J.-x. He. 2020. “Dynamic response analysis of ship–bridge collisions experiment.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-SCI. A 21 (7): 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900382.
Guo, J., C.-J. Hu, M.-J. Zhu, and Y.-Q. Ni. 2021. “Monitoring-based evaluation of dynamic characteristics of a long span suspension bridge under typhoons.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 11: 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00458-5.
Hassel, M., I. B. Utne, and J. E. Vinnem. 2017. “Allision risk analysis of offshore petroleum installations on the Norwegian Continental Shelf—An empirical study of vessel traffic patterns.” WMU J. Marit. Aff. 16 (2): 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0123-7.
Houck, S. W., and J. D. Powell. 2003. “Probability of midair collision during ultra closely spaced parallel approaches.” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26 (5): 702–710. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5124.
Huang, H., and S. Q. Chen. 2006. “Analysis of wind distribution characteristics in Zhoushan sea area.” [In Chinese.] Marin Forec. 23 (1): 76–80.
Inoue, K. 1977. “On the separation of traffic at straight waterway by distribution model of ship’s paths.” J. Jpn. Inst. Navig. 58: 103–115. https://doi.org/10.9749/jin.58.103.
Isherwood, R. M. 1972. “Wind resistance of merchant ships.” RINA Trans. 115: 327–338.
Kantrales, G. C., G. R. Consolazio, D. Wagner, and S. Fallaha. 2016. “Experimental and analytical study of high-level barge deformation for barge–bridge collision design.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (2): 04015039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000801.
Kim, W.-O., and C.-J. Kim. 2018. “Establishment of navigational risk assessment model combining dynamic ship domain and collision judgement model.” [In Korea.] J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Saf. 24 (1): 36–42. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.1.036.
Kim, Y., B. W. Nam, D. W. Kim, and Y. S. Kim. 2007. “Study on coupling effects of ship motion and sloshing.” Ocean Eng. 34 (16): 2176–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.03.008.
Kunz, C. U. 1998. Ship bridge collision in river traffic, analysis and design practice. ship collision analysis. Leiden, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Larsen, O. D. 1993. Ship collision with bridge, the interaction between vessel traffic and bridge structure. Zurich, Switzerland: IABSE Structural Engineering Document 4.
Li, S., Q. Meng, and X. Qu. 2012. “An overview of maritime waterway quantitative risk assessment models.” Risk Anal. 32 (3): 496–512. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01697.x.
Lin, T. L. 2007. “Research on aberrancy angle probability distribution for ship colliding with bridge piers.” [In Chinese.] Struct. Eng. 23 (1): 31–37. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-0159.2007.01.008.
Liu, H., N. Ma, and X. C. Gu. 2020. “Maneuverability-based approach for ship–bank collision probability under strong wind and ship–bank interaction.” J. Waterw. Port Coast. 146 (5): 04020032. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000594.
Luperi, F. J., and F. Pinto. 2016. “Structural behavior of barges in high-energy collisions against bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (2): 04015049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000789.
Mastaglio, L. 2014. “Bridge bashing.” Civ. Eng. 67: 38–40.
MTPRC (Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China). 2019. “Statistical bulletin of transportation industry development in 2019.” Accessed July 30, 2020. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-05/12/content_5510817.htm.
Otto, S., P. T. Pedersen, M. Samuelides, and P. C. Sames. 2002. “Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry.” Mar. Struct. 15 (4–5): 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00014-X.
Pedersen, P. T. 2010. “Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures.” Mar. Struct. 23 (3): 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.05.001.
Pedersen, P. T. 2014. “Risk assessment for ship collisions against offshore structures.” In Maritime technology and engineering, edited by G. Soares and T. A. Santos, 11–21. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sano, M., H. Yasukawa, and H. Hata. 2014. “Directional stability of a ship in close proximity to channel wall.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 19 (4): 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0271-4.
Sha, Y., and J. Amdahl. 2019. “Numerical investigations of a prestressed pontoon wall subjected to ship collision loads.” Ocean Eng. 172: 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.11.054.
Sha, Y., and H. Hao. 2012. “Nonlinear finite element analysis of barge collision with a single bridge pier.” Eng. Struct. 41: 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.026.
Silveira, P. A. M., A. P. Teixeira, and S. C. Guedes. 2013. “Use of AIS data to characterize marine traffic patterns and ship collision risk off the coast of Portugal.” J. Navig. 66: 879–898. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0373463313000519.
Ung, S.-T. 2019. “Evaluation of human error contribution to oil tanker collision using fault tree analysis and modified fuzzy Bayesian Network based CREAM.” Ocean Eng. 179: 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.031.
Wang, J. J., and B. Geng. 2010. Probabilistic risk assessment and safety measurements of bridge under vessel collisions. [In Chinese.] Beijing: China Communications Press.
Wang, J. J., Y. C. Song, W. Wang, and C. J. Chen. 2019. “Evaluation of flexible floating anti-collision device subjected to ship impact using finite-element method.” Ocean Eng. 178: 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.005.
Wang, L., Y. Yang, D. Huang, Z. Zhang, and G. Chen. 2008. “An impact dynamics analysis on a new crashworthy device against ship–bridge collision.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 35 (8): 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.12.005.
Wen, Y. Q., H. Zhang, and L. X. Gan. 2011. “Impacts of wind and current on geometrical ship-bridge collision frequency.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Transportation Information and Safety, edited by X. Yan, P. Yi, C. Wu, and M. Zhong, 2443–2450. Wuhan: China Communications and Transportation Association.
Wrobel, K., J. Montewka, and P. Kujala. 2017. “Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 165 (9): 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.029.
Wu, B., T. L. Yip, X. Yan, and C. G. Soares. 2019. “Fuzzy logic based approach for ship–bridge collision alert system.” Ocean Eng. 187: 106152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106152.
Xu, W., and L. Z. Sang. 2020. “Visualization of ship collision risk in the inland bridge waterway based on the maritime traffic simulation.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 782: 052001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/782/5/052001.
Yasukawa, H., and Y. Yoshimura. 2015. “Introduction of MMG standard method for ship maneuvering predictions.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 20 (1): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0293-y.
Yepes, J. L., I. Hwang, and M. Rotea. 2007. “New algorithms for aircraft intent inference and trajectory prediction.” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30 (2): 370–382. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.26750.
Yu, P. W., and H. Chen. 2014. “Modeling and simulation of ship motion for dynamic positioning vessel.” Adv. Mater. Res. 919–921: 2127–2130. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.919-921.2127.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Jan 30, 2022
Accepted: Jul 17, 2022
Published online: Sep 14, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 14, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology, Hangzhou 310012, China; School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610000, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3605-2999. Email: [email protected]
Dr.Eng. Student, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology, Hangzhou 310012, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4703-7700. Email: [email protected]
Dr.Eng. Student, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology, Hangzhou 310012, China. Email: [email protected]
Jinhui Wang [email protected]
Ma.Eng. Student, Institute of Bridge Engineering, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology, Hangzhou 310012, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share