Abstract

Seismic safety assessment of reinforced concrete box girder bridges has received considerable attention as they are increasingly popular in modern highway systems. However, the detailed seismic assessment of box girder bridges requires a consideration of the material nonlinearity and uncertainty in geometry, material properties, and loading. This paper presents the development of metamodels for selected seismic response parameters of a box girder bridge considering the uncertain input variables using high-dimensional model representation, a relatively new nonstatistical metamodel-based approach. The seismic responses at the sampling points of high-dimensional model representation are evaluated through detailed finite-element analysis. The developed metamodels are further utilized to generate seismic fragility curves that are found to be much simpler than traditional fragility analysis. The results from this approach are found to agree with that of other popular response surface methods (using Central Composite Design and Box Behnken Design) with significantly fewer simulations. High-dimensional model representation (HDMR) provides a failure metamodel that includes all related random variables, but at the same time significantly reduces the computational effort of fragility analyses.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alış, Ö. F., and H. Rabitz. 2001. “Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations.” J. Math. Chem. 29 (2): 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010979129659.
ASCE/SEI (Structural Engineering Institute). 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. ATC 13-1985. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Balu, A. S., and B. N. Rao. 2012. “High dimensional model representation based formulations for fuzzy finite element analysis of structures.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 50: 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.09.012.
Box, G. E. P., and D. W. Behnken. 1960. “Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables.” Technometrics 2 (4): 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912.
Box, G. E. P., and K. B. Wilson. 1951. “On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions.” J. R. Stat. Soc. B 13 (1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x.
Buckle, I. G., M. C. Constantinou, M. Dicleli, and H. Ghasemi. 2006. “Seismic isolation of highway bridges.” Research Rep. No. MCEER-06-SP07. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Bucher, C. G., and U. Bourgund. 1990. “A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems.” Struct. Saf. 7 (1): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90012-E.
Buratti, N., B. Ferracuti, and M. Savoia. 2010. “Response surface with random factors for seismic fragility of reinforced concrete frames.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.06.003.
Chakraborty, S., B. Mandal, R. Chowdhury, and A. Chakrabarti. 2016. “Stochastic free vibration analysis of laminated composite plates using polynomial correlated function expansion.” Compos. Struct. 135: 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.044.
Chang, G. A., and J. B. Mander. 1994. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns. Part 1. Evaluation of seismic capacity. Technical Rep. No. NCEER-94-0006. Buffalo, NY: National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York.
Choi, E., R. DesRoches, and B. Nielson. 2004. “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct. 26 (2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006.
Chowdhury, R., B. N. Rao, and A. M. Prasad. 2009. “High-dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis.” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 25 (4): 301–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1118.
De Felice, G., and R. Giannini. 2010. “An efficient approach for seismic fragility assessment with application to old reinforced concrete bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 14 (2): 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903086028.
Dey, S., T. Mukhopadhyay, and S. Adhikari. 2015. “Stochastic free vibration analysis of angle-ply composite plates—A RS-HDMR approach.” Compos. Struct. 122: 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.057.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2012. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Franchin, P., A. Lupoi, P. E. Pinto, and M. I. Schotanus. 2003. “Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete structures using a response surface approach.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (S1): 45–77.
Huang, W., M. Pei, X. Liu, C. Yan, and Y. Wei. 2020. “Nonlinear optimization of orthotropic steel deck system based on response surface methodology.” Research 2020: 1303672.
Hwang, H., J. B. Jernigan, and Y.-W. Lin. 2000. “Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (4): 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(322).
Jeon, J.-S., S. Mangalathu, J. Song, and R. Desroches. 2019. “Parameterized seismic fragility curves for curved multi-frame concrete box-girder bridges using Bayesian parameter estimation.” J. Earthquake Eng. 23 (6): 954–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1342291.
Li, G., J. Hu, S.-W. Wang, P. G. Georgopoulos, J. Schoendorf, and H. Rabitz. 2006. “Random sampling-high dimensional model representation (RS-HDMR) and orthogonality of its different order component functions.” J. Phys. Chem. A 110 (7): 2474–2485. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp054148m.
Li, G., C. Rosenthal, and H. Rabitz. 2001a. “High dimensional model representations.” J. Phys. Chem. A 105: 33.
Li, G., S.-W. Wang, H. Rabitz, S. Wang, and P. Jaffé. 2002. “Global uncertainty assessments by high dimensional model representations (HDMR).” Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (21): 4445–4460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00417-7.
Li, G., S.-W. Wang, C. Rosenthal, and H. Rabitz. 2001b. “High dimensional model representations generated from low dimensional data samples.” J. Math. Chem. 30 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013172329778.
Mangalathu, S. 2017. “Performance based grouping and fragility analysis of box-girder bridges in California.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Mangalathu, S., and J.-S. Jeon. 2019. “Stripe-based fragility analysis of multispan concrete bridge classes using machine learning techniques.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (11): 1238–1255. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3183.
Mangalathu, S., J.-S. Jeon, and R. Desroches. 2018. “Critical uncertainty parameters influencing seismic performance of bridges using Lasso regression.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (3): 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2991.
Mangalathu, S., J. Jeon, R. Desroches, and J. Padgett. 2015. “Analysis of covariance to capture the importance of bridge attributes on the probabilistic seismic demand model.” In Vol. 16 Proc., 10th Pacific Conf. Earthquake Engineering, 1–8. McKinnon, VIC, Australia: Australian Earthquake Engineering Society.
Mangalathu, S., J.-S. Jeon, J. E. Padgett, and R. DesRoches. 2016. “ANCOVA-based grouping of bridge classes for seismic fragility assessment.” Eng. Struct. 123: 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.054.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES) user command-language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
Menegotto, M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Symp. on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, 15–22. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Montgomery, D. C. 2004. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Mottershead, J. E., and M. I. Friswell. 1993. “Model updating in structural dynamics: A survey.” J. Sound Vib. 167 (2): 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340.
Mukhopadhyay, T., T. K. Dey, R. Chowdhury, and A. Chakrabarti. 2015. “Structural damage identification using response surface-based multi-objective optimization: A comparative study.” Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 40 (4): 1027–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1591-3.
Muthukumar, S., and R. DesRoches. 2006. “A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (7): 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557.
Naveen, B. O., and A. S. Balu. 2021. “Structural damage identification of bridge using high dimensional model representation.” Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 22 (4): 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502287.2020.1861128.
Nielson, B. G., and R. Desroches. 2007. “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
Padgett, J. E., and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (8): 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.801.
Park, J., and P. Towashiraporn. 2014. “Rapid seismic damage assessment of railway bridges using the response-surface statistical model.” Struct. Saf. 47: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.10.001.
Pragalath, D. C. H., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2015. “Reliability evaluation of RC frame by two major fragility analysis methods.” Asian J. Civ. Eng. 16 (1): 47–66.
Rabitz, H., and Ö. F. Aliş. 1999. “General foundations of high-dimensional model representations.” J. Math. Chem. 25 (2–3): 197–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019188517934.
Rabitz, H., Ö. F. Aliş, J. Shorter, and K. Shim. 1999. “Efficient input–output model representations.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 117 (1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00152-0.
Ramanathan, K. N. 2012. Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Ramanathan, K., J. E. Padgett, and R. DesRoches. 2015. “Temporal evolution of seismic fragility curves for concrete box-girder bridges in California.” Eng. Struct. 97: 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.069.
Rao, B. N., and R. Chowdhury. 2008. “Probabilistic analysis using high dimensional model representation and fast Fourier transform.” Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 9 (6): 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502280802363035.
Sahu, D. K., and S. Datta. 2019. “Robust Majorana modes in one-dimensional disordered binary alloy.” AIP Conf. Proc. 2115 (1): 030385. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5113224.
Sahu, D., M. Nishanth, P. K. Dhir, P. Sarkar, R. Davis, and S. Mangalathu. 2019. “Stochastic response of reinforced concrete buildings using high dimensional model representation.” Eng. Struct. 179: 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.083.
Schotanus, M. I. J., P. Franchin, A. Lupoi, and P. E. Pinto. 2004. “Seismic fragility analysis of 3D structures.” Struct. Saf. 26 (4): 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.03.001.
Seo, J., L. Dueñas-Osorio, J. I. Craig, and B. J. Goodno. 2012. “Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events.” Eng. Struct. 45: 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.003.
Seo, J., and D. G. Linzell. 2012. “Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment.” Eng. Struct. 34: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.008.
Seo, J., and D. G. Linzell. 2013. “Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges.” Eng. Struct. 52: 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.023.
Shamsabadi, A., and L. Yan. 2008. “Closed-form force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment-backfill systems.” In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, Geotechnical Special Publication 181, edited by D. Zeng, M. T. Manzari, and D. R. Hiltunen. 1–10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, H.-K. Kim, and S.-H. Kim. 2000. “Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (12): 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1287).
Simpson, T. W., J. D. Peplinski, P. N. Koch, and J. K. Allen. 2001. “Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations.” Eng. Comput. 17 (2): 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007198.
Sobol, I. M. 2003. “Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 79 (2): 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00229-6.
Towashiraporn, P. 2004. “Building seismic fragilities using response surface metamodels.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Umar, S., N. Bakhary, and A. R. Z. Abidin. 2018. “Response surface methodology for damage detection using frequency and mode shape.” Measurement 115: 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.047.
Wu, C. J., and M. S. Hamada. 2009. Experiments: Planning, analysis, and optimization. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Xu, J.-G., G. Wu, D.-C. Feng, and J.-J. Fan. 2021. “Probabilistic multi-hazard fragility analysis of RC bridges under earthquake-tsunami sequential events.” Eng. Struct. 238: 112250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112250.
Zhu, F. Q., P. J. Li, and J. Zhang. 2015. “Probability-based uncertainty evaluation through Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and response surface technologies.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Performance-Based and Life-Cycle Structural Engineering, edited by D. Fernando, J.-G. Teng, and J. L. Torero, 320–329. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Jun 9, 2021
Accepted: Apr 26, 2022
Published online: Jun 22, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Deepak Kumar Sahu [email protected]
Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India; Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Centurion Univ. of Technology and Management, Odisha 752050, India. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1031-4479. Email: [email protected]
Assisstant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kerala 673601, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-5393. Email: [email protected]
Research Scientist, Structural Engineering and Data Science Division,Mangalathu, Puthoor P. O., Kollam, Kerala 691507, India ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-3919. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share