Full-Scale Testing and Stringer Connection Fatigue Analysis of a Historical Swiss Military Bridge for the Rhaetian Railway
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 9
Abstract
The stringer connections of a historical “Model 1936” Swiss military bridge are investigated through a full-scale field-testing program, with the aim of clarifying modeling uncertainties and enabling a standard fatigue analysis for practicing engineers. Due to global bending, axial tension forces arise in the bridge’s stringers, which were not considered in original dimensioning. In contrast to historical steel bridges with typical riveted connections, Fritz Stüssi designed the “Model 1936” military bridge with custom bolts and nuts. Unlike rivets, these custom bolts and nuts can accommodate prestressing and enhance connection stiffness and thereby encourage potential fatigue problems. Field tests with strain measurements along the stringer beams themselves were used to determine bending moment profiles and connection stiffness parameters, and to calibrate a static model of the bridge. Following the nominal stress method with a standard load model, a basic finite-element analysis indicates that the stress range in the bridge’s stringer connections lies within the prescribed fatigue limits from standards. The implementation of a five-year periodic inspection plan further ensures the bridge’s safe use and long-term integrity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge and thank Joël Bögli, Gianfranco Bronzini, and Jürg Conzett for their support and advice while completing the work presented in this article. Karl Baumann represented the RhB as the project client and played an important role in supporting full-scale testing and this later publication. The professionalism and on-site competence of Glauco Feltrin and Nemanja Popovic from EMPA while conducting full-scale testing were also highly appreciated.
References
Al-Emrani, M. 2005. “Fatigue performance of stringer-to-floor–beam connections in riveted railway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (2): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:2(179).
Al-Emrani, M., B. Åkesson, and R. Kliger. 2004. “Overlooked secondary effects in open-deck truss bridges.” Struct. Eng. Int. 14 (4): 307–312. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686604777963612.
Al-Emrani, M., and R. Kliger. 2003. “FE analysis of stringer-to-floor–beam connections in riveted railway bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 59: 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00114-1.
Brühwiler, E., I. F. C. Smith, and M. A. Hirt. 1990. “Fatigue and fracture of riveted bridge members.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (1): 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:1(198).
Byers, W. G. 2006. “Discussion of “fatigue performance of stringer-to-floor–beam connections in riveted railway bridges” by Mohammad Al-Emrani.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (3): 378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:3(378).
Conzett, J. 2010. “What is structural design?” Jürg Conzett in Conversation with Mohsen Mostafavi, NOW? Lecture Series, Harvard Graduate School of Design, Cambridge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eOe0T6G2IA.
DePiero, A. H., R. K. Paasch, and S. C. Lovejoy. 2002. “Finite-element modeling of bridge deck connection details.” J. Bridge Eng. 7 (4): 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:4(229).
Guyer, R. C., and J. A. Laman. 2012. “Distortion-induced stress investigation of double angle stringer-to-floor–beam connections in railroad bridges.” Eng. Struct. 38 (C): 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.007.
Haghani, R., M. Al-Emrani, and M. Heshmati. 2012. “Fatigue-prone details in steel bridges.” Buildings 2 (4): 456–476. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2040456.
Kurrer, K.-E. 2008. The history of the theory of structures, 1–848. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Matar, E. B., and R. Greiner. 2006. “Fatigue tests for a riveted steel railway bridge in Salzburg.” Struct. Eng. Int. 16 (3): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686606778026547.
Popovic, N., G. Feltrin, K.-E. Jalsan, and M. Wojtera. 2017. “Event-driven strain cycle monitoring of railway bridges using a wireless sensor network with sentinel nodes.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 24 (7): e1934. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1934.
Rageh, A., S. E. Azam, and D. G. Linzell. 2020. “Steel railway bridge fatigue damage detection using numerical models and machine learning: Mitigating influence of modeling uncertainty.” Int. J. Fatigue 134: 105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105458.
Rageh, A., D. G. Linzell, and S. E. Azam. 2018. “Automated, strain-based, output-only bridge damage detection.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 8 (5): 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0311-6.
Roeder, C. W., G. MacRae, A. Leland, and A. Rospo. 2005. “Extending the fatigue life of riveted coped stringer connections.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (1): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:1(69).
Rota, A. 2002. “Die Brücke aus der Kiste.” Tec21 128 (45): 6–11.
SIA (Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architekten-Verein). 2011. Erhaltung von Tragwerken–Stahlbau. Zurich, Switzerland: SIA.
SIA (Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architekten-Verein). 2013. Stahlbau. Zurich, Switzerland: SIA.
SIA (Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architekten-Verein). 2014. Einwirkungen auf Tragwerke. Zurich, Switzerland: SIA.
Silva, A. L. L., J. A. F. O. Correia, H. Xin, G. Lesiuk, A. M. P. De Jesus, A. A. Fernandes, and F. Berto. 2021. “Fatigue strength assessment of riveted details in railway metallic bridges.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 121: 105120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105120.
Stüssi, F. 1937. Ersatzbrücken 1936, 1–101. Zürich, Switzerland: Abteilung für Bahnbau b.d. Generaldirektion S.B.B.
Tulonen, J., T. Siitonen, and A. Laaksonen. 2019. “Behaviour of riveted stringer-to-floorbeam connections in cyclic load tests to failure.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 160 (C): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.05.018.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27 • Issue 9 • September 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 2, 2021
Accepted: Apr 11, 2022
Published online: Jul 13, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.