Case Studies
Mar 21, 2022

Seismic Behavior of Strengthened RC Columns under Combined Loadings

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 6

Abstract

Twenty-five reinforced concrete (RC) columns of section size 250 × 250 mm were designed and tested to study the seismic response considering the effect of loading case, strengthening method, and the predamage level, containing 21 columns reinforced with high-performance ferrocement laminate (HPFL)-bonded steel plates (BSPs), i.e., the intact strengthened columns (ISCs), earthquake-damaged strengthened columns (EDSCs), corrosion-damaged strengthened columns (CSCs) and coupled-predamaged strengthened columns (CPSCs). The bearing capacity of the specimens under the four different types of loading methods is ranked as follows: uniaxial compression–bending–shear (CBS) members, biaxial CBS members, biaxial CBS-torsion (CBST) members, and uniaxial CBST members. Compared with nonstrengthened specimens, the cracks of the strengthened RC columns are more fully developed, and the failure modes have been changed after strengthening. The failure modes and load–deformation curves had little significant difference for the strengthened RC columns with different damage under combined loading levels. The bearing capacity of strengthened RC columns with the applied loading of 400 kN improved, which increased to 60.1%–114.7%, 29.9%–103%, 65.2%–127%, and 49.2%–104.5% for ISCs, EDSCs, CSCs, and CPSCs, respectively. Moreover, the bearing capacity of specimens decreased due to the existence of horizontal eccentricity. Finally, based on the degraded trilinear restoring force model, the strengthened influence coefficient for loading α and displacement β and the torsion influence coefficient for loading γ and displacement ξ were introduced. A modified restoring force model of RC columns was presented, reflecting the loading method, predamage level, and strengthening method. The theoretical calculation values align with the test load–deformation curves, and the mean absolute error is almost less than 15%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work described in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51778060), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2020KW-067), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2021J011062), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (Grant Nos. 300102289401, 300102280711, and 300102280713).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
As
cross-sectional area of the tension reinforcement;
b, h, and h0
width, height, and effective height of the section;
fc and fcmax
axial and the maximum compressive stress of concrete;
fy
yield strength of the longitudinal steel bars;
E
experimental and theoretical data of the specimens;
Es, Ec
the elastic modulus of the reinforcement and concrete;
Kpj
average stiffness at the jth stage loading;
l
height of the column from the horizontal loading point to the column base;
My
yield moment;
n
number of cycles;
n0
axial compression ratio;
Py, Pu, Pcu
yield, peak, and ultimate shear force;
PEy,s, PEu,s
yield load and peak load of the experimental data for the strengthened specimens;
PTy,n, PTu,n
yield load and peak load of the theoretical data for the nonstrengthened specimens;
PEy,t, PEu,t
yield load and peak load experimental data of the CBST strengthened specimens;
PTy,0, PTu,0
yield load and peak load experimental data of the CBS strengthened specimens;
Py,u, Pu,u
yield load and peak load of the uniaxial strengthened specimens;
Py,b, Pu,b
yield load and peak load of the biaxial strengthened specimens;
PEd,s, PTd,n
yield, peak and ultimate displacement experimental data of the strengthened and nonstrengthened specimens;
PEd,t, PTd,0
yield displacement, peak displacement and failure displacement experimental data for the CBST displacement and theoretical data for CBS strengthened specimens;
R
error between the experimental and theoretical data of the specimens;
T
experimental and theoretical data of the specimens;
Vji
peak loading corresponding to the ith cycle at the jth stage loading;
uΔ
displacement ductility coefficient;
α
load reinforcement influence coefficient;
αE
ratio of the elastic modulus of the reinforcement and concrete;
αf
ratio of the yield strength of the longitudinal steel bars and the axial compressive strength;
αw
correction coefficient of the stirrup characteristic data;
β
torsional load influence coefficient;
γ
displacement-strengthened influence coefficient;
δ1
increase in the bearing capacity for the strengthened specimen compared with the corresponding control specimens;
δ2
effect of the axial compression ratio;
η
height coefficient of the concrete compression zone;
η1
effect of the loading method on the bearing capacity compared with the corresponding uniaxial CBS specimen;
η2
increase in the bearing capacity under uniaxial and biaxial CBST loading conditions;
η3
effect of the loading method on the bearing capacity compared with the corresponding biaxial CBS specimen;
λw
stirrup characteristic data;
μu, μcu
ductility coefficient corresponding to the peak displacement and the ultimate displacement;
ξ
displacement-strengthened influence coefficient;
ρt
tension steel ratio;
ρw
volume stirrup ratio;
Δb,t, Δb,0
yield, peak, and ultimate displacement of specimens under biaxial CBS and biaxial CBST;
Δji
displacement corresponding to Vji;
Δu,t, Δu,0
yield, peak, and ultimate displacement of specimens under uniaxial CBS and biaxial CBST;
Δy,t, Δu,0
yield displacement, peak displacement, and ultimate displacement of the theoretical data for the torsion-strengthened and nontorsion strengthened specimens; and
Δy, Δu, Δcu
yield, peak, and ultimate displacement.

References

Abdullah, K., and K. Takiguchi. 2003. “An investigation into the behavior and strength of reinforced concrete columns strengthened with ferrocement jackets.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 25 (2): 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00005-7.
Abdelnaby, A. E., T. M. Frankie, A. S. Elnashai, B. F. Spencer, D. A. Kuchma, P. Silva, and C.-M. Chang. 2014. “Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration.” Eng. Struct. 70: 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.009.
Adam, J. M., S. Ivorra, F. J. Pallarés, E. Giménez, and Calderón. P. A. 2009. “Axially loaded RC columns strengthened by steel caging. Finite element modelling.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23: 2265–2276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.014.
ASTM. 2011. Standard specification for deformed and plain, low-carbon, chromium, steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A1035/A1035M-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Byung, H. O., J. Y. Cho, and D. G. Park. 2003. “Failure behavior and separation criterion for strengthened concrete members with steel plates.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (9): 1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:9(1191).
Chellapandian, M., and S. S. Prakash. 2018. “Rapid repair of severely damaged reinforced concrete columns under combined axial compression and flexure: An experimental study.” Constr. Build. Mater. 173: 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.037.
Chellapandian, M., S. S. Prakash, and A. Rajagopal. 2018. “Analytical and finite element studies on hybrid FRP strengthened RC column elements under axial and eccentric compression.” Compos. Struct. 184: 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.109.
Chellapandian, M., S. S. Prakash, and A. Sharma. 2019. “Experimental investigations on hybrid strengthening of short reinforced concrete column elements under eccentric compression.” Struct. Concr. 20: 1955–1973. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800311.
Elghazy, M., A. El Refai, U. Ebead, and A. Nanni. 2018a. “Corrosion-damaged RC beams repaired with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (5): 04018039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000873.
Elghazy, M., A. El Refai, U. Ebead, and A. Nanni. 2018b. “Experimental results and modelling of corrosion-damaged concrete beams strengthened with externally-bonded composites.” Eng. Struct. 172 (Oct): 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.037.
GB. 2002. Code for design of concrete structures. GB 50010-2002. Beijing: China Academy of Architectural Engineering.
Hadi, M. N. S. 2007. “Behaviour of FRP strengthened concrete columns under eccentric compression loading.” Compos. Struct. 77 (1): 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.06.007.
Haoyu, Z., Q. Bowen, and M. Chenxi. 2019. “Experimental investigation on seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns under horizontally bi-directional cyclic loading.” China Civ. Eng. J. 52 (8): 49–61+71.
Hsu, H.-L., and C.-L. Wang. 2000. “Flexural–torsional behaviour of steel reinforced concrete members subjected to repeated loading.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29: 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5%3C667::AID-EQE930%3E3.0.CO;2-Y.
Huang, H., L. Bo-Quan, and W. U. Tao. 2011. “Shear performance and design methods of strengthened RC beams with high strength steel wire mesh.” [In Chinese.] J. Cent. South Univ. 42 (8): 2485–2492.
Huang, H., M. Guo, W. Zhang, J. Zeng, K. Yang, and H. Bai. 2021a. “Numerical investigation on the bearing capacity of RC columns strengthened by HPFL-BSP under combined loadings.” J. Build. Eng. 39: 102266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102266.
Huang, H., R. Hao, W. Zhang, and M. Huang. 2019a. “Experimental study on seismic performance of square RC columns subjected to combined loadings.” Eng. Struct. 184: 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.095.
Huang, H., M. Huang, W. Zhang, M. Guo, and S. Pospisil. 2020a. “Seismic performance of predamaged RC columns strengthened with HPFL and BSP under combined loadings.” Eng. Struct. 203: 109871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109871.
Huang, H., M. Huang, W. Zhang, S. Pospisil, and T. Wu. 2020b. “Experimental investigation on rehabilitation of corroded RC columns with BSP and HPFL under combined loadings.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (8): 04020157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002725.
Huang, H., M. Huang, W. Zhang, and T. Wu. 2019b. “Seismic behavior of strengthened square reinforced concrete columns under combined loadings.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (11): 1468–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1625415.
Huang, H., M. Huang, W. Zhang, and S. Yang. 2021b. “Experimental study of predamaged columns strengthened by HPFL and BSP under combined load cases.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 17 (9): 1210–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1801768.
Huang, H., B. Liu, J. Shi, and F. Zhang. 2017. “Early axial compression performance of square columns strengthened with HPFL and bonded steel plates.” [In Chinese.] J. Cent. South Univ. 48 (6): 1635–1644.
Jiang, L. M., F. H. Tang, and M. L. Ou. 2011. “Experimental research on the strengthening of RC columns by high performance ferrocement laminates.” Adv. Mater. Res. 243-249: 1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.1409.
Jinping, O., H. Zheng, W. Bin, and Q. Fawei. 1999. “Seismic damage performance-based design of reinforced concrete structures.” [In Chinese.] Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 19 (1): 21–30.
Li-xian, L., S. Xu-dong, and G. Zhen-hai. 2003. “Experimental investigation of strengthened reinforced concrete columns after exposure to high temperature.” [In Chinese.] Eng. Mech. 20 (5): 18–23.
Min, L., and S. Shooping. 2018. “Seismic behavior of cavity walls with HPFL strips composite ring beam and constructional column.” [In Chinese.] Earthquake Eng. Eng. Dynamics 38 (05): 77–84.
Omranian, E., A. E. Abdelnaby, and G. Abdollahzadeh. 2018. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC skew bridges subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 114: 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.007.
Park, Y.-J., and A. H.-S. Ang. 1985. “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4): 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722).
Phan, V., M. S. Saiidi, A. John, and G. Hamid. 2007. “Near-fault ground motion effects on reinforced concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (7): 982–989. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(982).
Pinto, A. V., J. Molina, and G. Tsionis. 2003. “Cyclic tests on large-scale models of existing bridge piers with rectangular hollow cross-section.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (13): 1995–2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.311.
Prakash, S., A. Belarbi, and Y.-M. You. 2010. “Seismic performance of circular RC columns subjected to axial force, bending, and torsion with low and moderate shear.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.014.
Saiidi, M. 1982. “Hysteresis models for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Div. 108 (5): 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005945.
Saljoughian, A., and D. Mostofinejad. 2016. “Axial–flexural interaction in square RC columns confined by intermittent CFRP wraps.” Composites, Part B 89: 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.047.
Shiyong, J., T. Shuai, F. Wei, Y. Weilai, G. Hongwei, and S. Nan. 2019. “Experimental study on seismic performance of damaged engineered cementitious composite columns reinforced with CFRP bars and strengthened by CFRP sheets.” [In Chinese.] J. Build. Struct. 40 (6): 109–124.
Shouping, S., and W. Zhi. 2016. “Numerical simulation and experimental investigation on precast hollow-core slabs strengthened with HPFL.” [In Chinese.] J. Hunan Univ., Nat. Sci. 43 (1): 68–75.
Silva, P. F., N. J. Ereckson, and G. D. Chen. 2007. “Seismic retrofit of bridge joints in central U.S. with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites.” ACI Struct. J. 104 (2): 207–217.
Torabian, A., and D. Mostofinejad. 2017. “Externally bonded reinforcement on grooves technique in circular reinforced columns strengthened with longitudinal carbon fiber-reinforced polymer under eccentric loading.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (4): 861–873. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689567.
Yijun, W., S. Jumin, and M. Baomin. 1985. “Improvement of ductility of reinforced concrete columns with different types of stirrups.” J. Build. Struct. 6: 41–47.
Zeng, L. H., and Z. Zhong. 2016. “Stiffness calculation of RC beam strengthened by high performance ferrocement laminate after fire on second load.” J. Build. Struct. 37 (3): 20–28.
Zhang, G., X. Lu, and B. Liu. 2006. “Research on restoring force models of frame columns with ultra-limited axial compression ratio.” J. Build. Struct. 27 (1): 90–98.
Zhong, M. 2016. “Simplified method for analysis of damage characteristic of RC columns under and after low cyclic loading.” J. Civ. Eng. 49: 85–91.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Jul 30, 2021
Accepted: Feb 3, 2022
Published online: Mar 21, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 21, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hua Huang
Professor, School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Xi'an Technological Univ., Xi'an 710021, China; Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Chang'an Univ., Xi'an 710061, China.
Mengxue Guo
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an Univ., Xi’an 710061, China.
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Fujian Univ. of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China; Researcher, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 190 00, Czech Republic (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-4190. Email: [email protected]
Min Huang
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an Univ., Xi’an 710061, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Influence of Geo-Grid Confinement on Axial Behavior of Circular Short Columns, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1454, 29, 3, (2024).
  • Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete with Hybrid Synthetic Fiber Waste Exposed to Elevated Temperatures, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13010129, 13, 1, (129), (2023).
  • Numerical modeling for assessing progressive collapse risk of RC buildings exposed to blast loads, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.040, 48, (1190-1208), (2023).
  • Pseudo-static tests of reinforced concrete pier columns confined with pre-tensioned superelastic shape memory alloy wires, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115680, 280, (115680), (2023).
  • Indirect Analysis of Concrete Slump Using Different Metaheuristic-Empowered Neural Processors, Sustainability, 10.3390/su141610373, 14, 16, (10373), (2022).
  • Sub-Surface Defect Depth Approximation in Cold Infrared Thermography, Sensors, 10.3390/s22187098, 22, 18, (7098), (2022).
  • Hybrid Ensemble Model for Predicting the Strength of FRP Laminates Bonded to the Concrete, Polymers, 10.3390/polym14173505, 14, 17, (3505), (2022).
  • PCA-Based Hybrid Intelligence Models for Estimating the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Axially Loaded Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes, Materials, 10.3390/ma15186477, 15, 18, (6477), (2022).
  • Performance Prediction of Cement Stabilized Soil Incorporating Solid Waste and Propylene Fiber, Materials, 10.3390/ma15124250, 15, 12, (4250), (2022).
  • Application of Polyacrylic Hydrogel in Durability and Reduction of Environmental Impacts of Concrete through ANN, Gels, 10.3390/gels8080468, 8, 8, (468), (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share