Technical Papers
Aug 5, 2021

Simplified Added-Mass Model for Evaluating the Response of Rectangular Hollow Bridge Piers under Earthquakes

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 10

Abstract

A simplified added-mass model is proposed in this paper for evaluating the seismic response of rectangular hollow piers in deep water, which are widely used in railway bridges. For this purpose, the accurate and concise formulas for the outer and inner hydrodynamic pressures were first derived after smoothing the pier outer surface corners by using small circular arcs. Then, the kinematic equation of the pier–water system was solved in the frequency domain and converted to the time domain with an inverse Fourier transform. In addition, the expressions for the outer and inner water added masses that were induced by elastic vibration and rigid motion were obtained. To verify the accuracy of these analytical solutions in terms of hydrodynamic pressures and added masses, a finite-element modeling approach, based on potential-based fluid elements (PBFEs), was employed to define numerical models of bridge piers in water. A comparison of the added mass coefficients induced by elastic vibration and rigid motion indicates that the former can be substituted by the latter. Meanwhile, water compressibility effects on the hydrodynamic forces have been fully discussed and proven to be negligible for general piers under most earthquakes. Finally, for convenience of application, simplified formulas for added mass and a simplified added model were presented to simulate the seismic response of rectangular hollow piers in water. The good agreement between the dynamic results from the simplified expressions and numerical method confirmed the former’s accuracy and convenience for engineering applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51878487 and 41672266). Financial support from these organizations is gratefully acknowledged.

References

ADINA R&D. 2010. Theory and modeling guide. Rep. ARD 10-7. Watertown, MA: ADINA R&D.
Bouaanani, N., and F. Y. Lu. 2009. “Assessment of potential-based fluid finite elements for seismic analysis of dam–reservoir systems.” Comput. Struct. 87 (3–4): 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.10.006.
Cassese, P., P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2017. “Experimental study on the seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete bridge piers with hollow rectangular section.” Eng. Struct. 144: 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.047.
Deng, Y., Q. Guo, and L. Xu. 2017. “Experimental and numerical study on modal dynamic response of water-surrounded slender bridge pier with pile foundation.” Shock Vib. 2017: 4769637. https://doi.10.1155/2017/4769637.
Deng, Y. L., Q. Guo, Y. I. Shah, and L. Xu. 2019. “Study on modal dynamic response and hydrodynamic added mass of water-surrounded hollow bridge pier with pile foundation.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019: 1562753. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1562753.
Ding, Y., R. Ma, Y. D. Shi, and Z. X. Li. 2018. “Underwater shaking table tests on bridge pier under combined earthquake and wave-current action.” Mar. struct. 58: 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.12.004.
Du, X., P. Wang, and M. Zhao. 2014. “Simplified formula of hydrodynamic pressure on circular bridge piers in the time domain.” Ocean Eng. 85: 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.031.
Gou, H., H. Long, Y. Bao, G. D. Chen, Q. Pu, and R. Kang. 2018. “Stress distributions in girder-arch-pier connections of long-span continuous rigid frame arch railway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (7): 04018039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001250.
Goyal, A., and A. K. Chopra. 1989. “Simplified evaluation of added hydrodynamic mass for intake towers.” J. Eng. Mech. 115 (7): 1393–1412. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:7(1393).
Han, R. P. S., and H. Xu. 1996. “A simple and accurate added mass model for hydrodynamic fluid–structure interaction analysis.” J. Franklin Inst. 333 (6): 929–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(96)00043-9.
Huang, X., and Z. X. Li. 2011. “Influence of free surface wave and water compressibility on earthquake induced hydrodynamic pressure of bridge pier in deep water.” [In Chinese.] J. Tianjin Univ. 44 (4): 319–323.
Jiang, H., B. Wang, X. Bai, C. Zeng, and H. Zhang. 2017. “Simplified expression of hydrodynamic pressure on deepwater cylindrical bridge piers during earthquakes.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (6): 04017014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001032.
Li, Q., L. Liu, and W. L. Yang. 2016. “Experimental and numerical investigation on pier–water coupling vibration of bridges in deep water.” [In Chinese.] J. Eng. Mech. 33 (7): 197–203. https://doi.CNKI:SUN:GCLX.0.2016-07-027.
Li, Q., and W. Yang. 2013. “An improved method of hydrodynamic pressure calculation for circular hollow piers in deep water under earthquake.” Ocean Eng. 72: 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.001.
Liang, F. Y., X. Liang, H. Zhang, and C. Wang. 2020. “Seismic response from centrifuge model tests of a scoured bridge with a pile-group foundation.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (8): 04020054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001594.
Liaw C, Y., and A. K. Chopra. 1974. “Dynamics of towers surrounded by water.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 3 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290030104.
Liu, H., X. Tao, Z. Tao, and Y. Qin. 2020. “Seismic hydrodynamic pressure on concrete bridge pier with submerged depth from a set of shaking table model tests.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1624: 022019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1624/2/022019.
Liu, Z. Y., Q. Li, C. H. Zhao, and F. Chen. 2008. “Analysis of the hydrodynamic added mass for rectangular hollow deep-water bridge pier under earthquake.” [In Chinese.] J. Vib. Shock. 27: 2. https://doi.10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2008.02.011.
Morison, J. R., J. W. Johnson, and S. A. Schaaf. 1950. “The force exerted by surface waves on piles.” J. Petrol. Technol. 2 (5): 149–154. https://doi.org/10.2118/950149-G.
Olson, L. G., and K. J. Bathe. 1985. “Analysis of fluid–structure interactions: A direct symmetric coupled formulation based on the fluid velocity potential.” Comput. Struct. 21 (1–2): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(85)90226-3.
Qi, Q., C. Shao, W. Wei, Z. Xiao, and J. He. 2020. “Seismic performance of railway rounded rectangular hollow tall piers using the shaking table test.” Eng. Struct. 220: 110968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110968.
Song, B., N. Lichao, and F. Qi. 2015. “Study on a simplified calculation method for seismic response analysis of bridge pier in icy water.” J. Earthquake Eng. 19 (7): 1140–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1036329.
Sun, Z., D. Wang, T. Wang, S. Wu, and X. Guo. 2019. “Investigation on seismic behavior of bridge piers with thin-walled rectangular hollow section using quasi-static cyclic tests.” Eng. Struct. 200: 109708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109708.
Tanaka, Y., and R. T. Hudspeth. 1988. “Restoring forces on vertical circular cylinders forced by earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 16 (1): 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160108.
Wang, P. G., M. Zhao, and X. L. Du. 2018a. “Analytical solution and simplified formula for earthquake induced hydrodynamic pressure on elliptical hollow cylinders in water.” Ocean Eng. 148: 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.019.
Wang, P. G., M. Zhao, and X. L. Du. 2019a. “A simple added mass model for simulating elliptical cylinder vibrating in water under earthquake action.” Ocean Eng. 179: 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.046.
Wang, P. G., M. Zhao, and X. L. Du. 2019b. “Simplified formula for earthquake-induced hydrodynamic pressure on round-ended and rectangular cylinders surrounded by water.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (2): 04018137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001567.
Wang, P. G., M. Zhao, X. L. Du, and X. L. Cheng. 2019c. “A finite element solution of earthquake-induced hydrodynamic forces and wave forces on multiple circular cylinders.” Ocean Eng. 189: 106336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106336.
Wang, P. G., M. Zhao, X. L. Du, J. B. Liu, and J. Y. Chen. 2018b. “Simplified evaluation of earthquake-induced hydrodynamic pressure on circular tapered cylinders surrounded by water.” Ocean Eng. 164: 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.048.
Wang, P. G., M. Zhao, H. Li, and X. L. Du. 2018c. “An accurate and efficient time-domain model for simulating water-cylinder dynamic interaction during earthquakes.” Eng. Struct. 166: 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.081.
Wei, K. 2013. “Earthquake induced fluid–structure effects and seismic response analyses of deepwater foundation for bridge.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ.
Wei, K., W. Yuan, and N. Bouaanani. 2013. “Experimental and numerical assessment of the three-dimensional modal dynamic response of bridge pile foundations submerged in water.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (10): 1032–1041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000442.
Wei, K., J. Zhang, and S. Qin. 2019. “Experimental and numerical assessment into frequency domain dynamic response of deep water rigid-frame bridge.” J. Earthquake Eng. 30 (12): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1684402.
Yang, W., and Q. Li. 2013a. “The expanded Morison equation considering inner and outer water hydrodynamic pressure of hollow piers.” Ocean Eng. 69: 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.008.
Yang, W., and Q. Li. 2013b. “A new added mass method for fluid–structure interaction analysis of deep-water bridge.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (6): 1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0134-2.
Zhang, J., K. Wei, Y. Pang, M. Zhang, and S. Qin. 2019. “Numerical investigation into hydrodynamic effects on the seismic response of complex hollow bridge pier submerged in reservoir: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (2): 05018016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001340.
Zhao, M., L. X. Wang, Y. M. Huang, X. L. Du, and J. B. Liu. 2020. “A simplified added mass model for dynamic water pressure calculation of rectangle cylinder under earthquake.” [In Chinese.] J. Disaster Prev. Mitigation Engineering. 40 (2): 147–184. https://doi.10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2020.02.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Dec 18, 2020
Accepted: Jun 27, 2021
Published online: Aug 5, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fayun Liang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-7473. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Efficient simulation of stochastic seismic response of long-span bridges in river valleys using hybrid BEM-FEM, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107690, 165, (107690), (2023).
  • Nonlinear random vibration of the slender deep-water pier under seismic excitation, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103423, 72, (103423), (2023).
  • State-of-the-art and annual progress of bridge engineering in 2021, Advances in Bridge Engineering, 10.1186/s43251-022-00070-1, 3, 1, (2022).
  • Frequency-domain approach of hydroelastic response for offshore bottom-mounted slender structure, Ships and Offshore Structures, 10.1080/17445302.2022.2109351, (1-12), (2022).
  • Dynamic analysis of bridge structures under combined earthquakes and wave loadings based on a simplified nonlinear Morison equation considering limit wave steepness, Ocean Engineering, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112690, 265, (112690), (2022).
  • A 2D non-water substructure model in time domain for breakwater-water-bedrock (layered) system excited by inclined seismic waves, Ocean Engineering, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112223, 262, (112223), (2022).
  • Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the deep-water bridge piers under combined earthquakes and wave actions, Ocean Engineering, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112076, 261, (112076), (2022).
  • Mega-earthquake response of benchmark high-speed rail bridge piers based on shaking table tests, Engineering Failure Analysis, 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106608, 140, (106608), (2022).
  • Seismic response of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines under combined wind, wave and hydrodynamic loads at scoured sites, Computers and Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104640, 144, (104640), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share