Abstract

Previous seismic events have shown that bridges are more susceptible to severe damage when subjected to near-fault ground motions. Near-fault ground motions usually possess obvious pulse-like features in their velocity time histories. The velocity pulses are further distinguished by either a distinct acceleration pulse (acceleration-pulse) or a succession of high-frequency one-sided acceleration spikes (non-acceleration-pulse). The acceleration-pulse ground motions will probably cause more damage to structures compared with non-acceleration-pulse ground motions. This study will focus on assessing the effects of acceleration-pulse ground motions on the seismic response of a pile-supported bridge at a canyon site. A refined three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model will be developed for the nonlinear time history response analysis of this ground–bridge system, in which enhanced modeling of free field boundary and soil–pile interactions will be considered. To investigate the seismic response of the ground–bridge system, six pairs of acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions will be used, and each pair has the same peak ground acceleration (PGA). The seismic response of this ground–bridge system will be subjected to acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions and will be fully evaluated considering two aspects. First, the seismic time history responses of the ground–bridge system will be assessed under a single representative acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions. Second, the mean of the maximum seismic response of the ground–bridge system under multiple acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions will be explored. The results from this study show that compared with the non-acceleration-pulse ground motions, the acceleration-pulse ground motions had a more significant impact on the seismic response of the ground–bridge system. Therefore, special care should be taken on the acceleration-pulse effect of ground motion, because bridge structures are more vulnerable to damage when subjected to acceleration-pulse ground motions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFE0205100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808307 and 51878235), and the Special Project Fund of Taishan Scholars of Shandong Province, China (2015-212).

References

Akiyama, M., D. M. Frangopol, and H. Ishibashi. 2020. “Toward life-cycle reliability-, risk-, and resilience-based design and assessment of bridges and bridge networks under independent and interacting hazards: Emphasis on earthquake, tsunami and corrosion.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (1): 26–50. https://doi:10.1080/15732479.2019.1604770.
Alonso-Rodríguez, A., and E. Miranda. 2015. “Assessment of building behavior under near-fault pulse-like ground motions through simplified models.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 79: 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.08.009.
Aviram, A., K. R. Mackie, and B. Stojadinovic. 2008. “Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 7 (4): 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1008-3.
Baker, J. W. 2007. “Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (5): 1486–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
Bayraktar, A., A. C. Altunişik, B. Sevim, M. E. Kartal, T. Türker, and Y. Bilici. 2009. “Comparison of near-and far-fault ground motion effect on the nonlinear response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems.” Nonlinear Dyn. 58 (4): 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9508-x.
Bi, K., and H. Hao. 2012. “Modelling and simulation of spatially varying earthquake ground motions at sites with varying conditions.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 29: 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.09.002.
Bi, K., H. Hao, and N. Chouw. 2011. “Influence of ground motion spatial variation, site condition and SSI on the required separation distances of bridge structures to avoid seismic pounding.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (9): 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1076.
Billah, A. H. M. M., M. S. Alam, and M. A. R. Bhuiyan. 2013. “Fragility analysis of retrofitted multicolumn bridge bent subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motion.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (10): 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000452.
Boris, J., G. Jie, and N. Tafazzoli. 2009. “Numerical modeling and simulations of a complete earthquake-soil-pile-bridge seismic performance.” In Contemporary Topics in In Situ Testing, Analysis, and Reliability of Foundations, Geotechnical Special Publication 186, edited by M. Iskander, D. F. Laefer, and M. H. Hussein, 190–197. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Caltrans SDC. 2004. Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 1.3. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Chang, Z., F. De Luca, and K. Goda. 2019a. “Automated classification of near-fault acceleration pulses using wavelet packets.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 34 (7): 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12437.
Chang, Z., F. De Luca, and K. Goda. 2019b. “Near-fault acceleration pulses and non-acceleration pulses: Effects on the inelastic displacement ratio.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (11): 1256–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3184.
Chang, Z., X. Sun, C. Zhai, J. X. Zhao, and L. Xie. 2016. “An improved energy-based approach for selecting pulse-like ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (14): 2405–2411. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2758.
Chiaramonte, M. M., P. Arduino, D. E. Lehman, and C. W. Roeder. 2013. “Seismic analyses of conventional and improved marginal wharves.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (10): 1435–1450. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2280.
Chopra, A. K., and C. Chintanapakdee. 2001. “Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (12): 1769–1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.92.
Chouw, N., and H. Hao. 2008. “Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: Effect on response with conventional expansion joint.” Eng. Struct. 30 (1): 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.002.
Dabaghi, M., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2017. “Stochastic model for simulation of near-fault ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (6): 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2839.
Davoodi, M., M. K. Jafari, and N. Hadiani. 2013. “Seismic response of embankment dams under near-fault and far-field ground motion excitation.” Eng. Geol. 158: 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.008.
Decò, A., and D. M. Frangopol. 2013. “Life-cycle risk assessment of spatially distributed aging bridges under seismic and traffic hazards.” Earthquake Spectra. 29 (1): 127–153. https://doi:10.1193/1.4000094.
Dicleli, M., and S. Buddaram. 2007. “Equivalent linear analysis of seismic-isolated bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions with forward rupture directivity effect.” Eng. Struct. 29 (1): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.004.
Elgamal, A., L. Yan, Z. Yang, and J. P. Conte. 2008. “Three-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt Bay bridge-foundation-ground system.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (7): 1165–1176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1165).
Frangopol, D. M., and P. Bocchini. 2012. “Bridge network performance, maintenance, and optimization under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (4): 341–356. https://doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.563089.
Goel, R. K., and A. K. Chopra. 2008. “Role of shear keys in seismic behavior of bridges crossing fault-rupture zones.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (4): 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:4(398).
Hwang, H., J. B. Jernigan, and Y. W. Lin. 2000. “Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (4): 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:4(322).
Jangid, R. S. 2007. “Optimum lead-rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions.” Eng. Struct. 29 (10): 2503–2513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.010.
Li, S., F. Zhang, J. Q. Wang, M. S. Alam, and J. Zhang. 2017. “Effects of near-fault motions and artificial pulse-type ground motions on super-span cable-stayed bridge systems.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (3): 04016128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001008.
Lu, C., M. Gui, and S. Lai. 2014. “A numerical study on soil-group-pile-bridge-pier interaction under the effect of earthquake loading.” J. Earthquake Tsunami 8 (1): 1350037. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431113500371.
MacRae, G. A., D. V. Morrow, and C. W. Roeder. 2001. “Near-fault ground motion effects on simple structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (9): 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(996).
Mavroeidis, G. P., and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2003. “A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 (3): 1099–1131. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020100.
McKenna, F. T., and G. L. Fenves. 2001. The OpenSees command language manual (version 1.2). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Mollaioli, F., and A. Bosi. 2012. “Wavelet analysis for the characterization of forward-directivity pulse-like ground motions on energy basis.” Meccanica 47 (1): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-011-9433-1.
Phan, V., M. S. Saiidi, J. Anderson, and H. Ghasemi. 2007. “Near-fault ground motion effects on reinforced concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (7): 982–989. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(982).
Sehhati, R., A. Rodriguez-Marek, M. ElGawady, and W. F. Cofer. 2011. “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures.” Eng. Struct. 33 (3): 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.032.
Shin, H. S. 2007. “Numerical modeling of a bridge system & its application for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Ph.D. thesis, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
Somerville, P. G., N. F. Smith, R. W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson. 1997. “Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 (1): 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199.
Su, L., H. P. Wan, Y. Dong, D. M. Frangopol, and X. Z. Ling. 2019. “Seismic fragility assessment of large-scale pile-supported wharf structures considering soil-pile interaction.” Eng. Struct. 186: 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.022.
Su, L., H. P. Wan, Y. Dong, D. M. Frangopol, and X. Z. Ling. 2021. “Efficient uncertainty quantification of wharf structures under seismic scenarios using Gaussian process surrogate model.” J. Earthquake Eng. 25 (1): 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1507955.
Xin, L., X. Li, Z. Zhang, and L. Zhao. 2019. “Seismic behavior of long-span concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge subjected to near-fault fling-step motions.” Eng. Struct. 180: 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.006.
Yang, D., and J. Zhou. 2015. “A stochastic model and synthesis for near-fault impulsive ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (2): 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2468.
Zhang, S., and G. Wang. 2013. “Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 53: 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: Dec 24, 2019
Accepted: Jan 23, 2021
Published online: Apr 7, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 7, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hua-Ping Wan, M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Univ. of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9312-4170. Email: [email protected]
Dan M. Frangopol, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and the Fazlur R. Khan Endowed Chair of Structural Engineering and Architecture, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh Univ., 117 ATLSS Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015-4729. Email: [email protected]
Zhiwang Chang [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China. Email: [email protected]
Wei-Xin Ren [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen Univ., Shenzhen 518060, China. Email: [email protected]
Xianzhang Ling [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Univ. of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share