Composite Steel Tee Concrete Deck Bridge System: Performance of Interface Shear Connection
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 3
Abstract
A new short-span highway bridge system composed of inverted steel tee sections embedded in a concrete deck slab was developed for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. The interface shear connection between the concrete deck slab and steel tee sections is nontraditional and is fabricated by drilling holes near the top of the steel tee stems, placing transverse reinforcement bars through the holes, and casting the top of the steel tee stem into the deck. This paper discusses the mechanism and design of this interface shear connection between the concrete deck and the steel tee section to create composite action. The research approach is based on push-out tests conducted on full-scale subassemblies and validated with destructive tests on a full-scale prototype bridge module. The test program and the resulting design equations are discussed. The test results indicate that the response of this interface shear connection between the concrete deck and the steel tee section is dominated by shear yielding of the reinforcement bars passing through the holes in the tee section stem. After shear yielding of the bars, there is local crushing of the concrete and strength recovery as the bars develop catenary action. At larger relative deformation between the deck and steel tee (shear slip), a concrete breakout failure occurs on the bottom of the concrete deck. The use of a stem hole with no bar creates a brittle concrete shear dowel; the strength of this dowel can be estimated using a concrete shear strength formulation. Because the concrete dowels are brittle and the reinforcement bars passing through the stem holes have a ductile response, the recommended interface shear connection utilizes bars in all holes. The results of the full-scale bridge module test indicate that the interface shear connection and associated design equations provide effective composite action in the bridge system.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The work conducted herein was supported through research funding from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation through Agreement E03134 Work Order 14. The authors are grateful to collaborators involved in the development, design, fabrication, and testing of the prototype STCD modules. Specifically, the authors acknowledge Tom Macioce, Heather Sorce, and Lauren Rogers of PennDOT, Scott Eshenaur and Phil Ritchie of Modjeski and Masters, Bob Slaw at Slaw Precast, and High Steel Structures. The authors also acknowledge William Koller of PennDOT who initiated the research effort. The steel shapes used in the STCD modules were rolled by Nucor-Yamamoto Steel Company (Blytheville, Arkansas) and fabricated by High Steel Structures (Lancaster, Pennsylvania). The precast operations were conducted by Slaw Precast (Lehighton, Pennsylvania).
References
AASHTO. 2016. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed. with 2016 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Association). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary (ACI 318R-19). ACI 318-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ahn, J.-H., C.-G. Lee, J.-H. Won, and S.-H. Kim. 2010. “Shear resistance of the Perfobond-Rib shear connector depending on concrete strength and rib arrangement.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 66 (10): 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.008.
ASTM. 2014a. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014b. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. ASTM C469-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon–steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A615-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard specification for structural steel for bridges. ASTM A709-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM A370-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Cândido-Martins, J. P. S., L. F. Costa-Neves, and P. C. G. d. S. Vellasco. 2010. “Experimental evaluation of the structural response of Perfobond shear connectors.” Eng. Struct. 32 (8): 1976–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.031.
Cercone, C., C. Naito, and R. Sause. 2016. PA flexbeam shear strength evaluation and construction methods. ATLSS Rep. No. 16-01. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.
Chapman, J. C., and S. Balakrishnan. 1964. “Experiments on composite beams.” Struct. Eng. 42 (11): 369–383.
Haber, Z., and B. Graybeal. 2018. Performance of grouted connections for prefabricated bridge deck elements. McLean, VA: Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
Klaiber, F. W., T. J. Wipf, J. R. Reid, and M. J. Peterson. 1997. Investigation of two bridge alternatives for low volume roads. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Lee, P.-G., C.-S. Shim, and S.-P. Chang. 2005. “Static and fatigue behavior of large stud shear connectors for steel–concrete composite bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 61 (9): 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.01.007.
Leonhardt, F., W. Andra, H.-P. Andrä, and H. P. Harre. 1987. “Neues, vorteilhaftes Verbundmittel für Stahlverbund-Tragwerke mit hoher Dauerfestigkeit.” Beton-Stahlbetonbau 82 (12): 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/best.198700500.
Naito, C., R. Hendricks, and R. Sause. 2018a. Example configurations of the PA flexbeam bridge system. ATLSS Rep. No.18-05. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.
Naito, C., R. Hendricks, and R. Sause. 2018b. Full-scale evaluation of the PA flexbeam bridge system. ATLSS Rep. No. 18-04. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.
Naito, C., R. Hendricks, R. Sause, and C. Cercone. 2020. “Composite steel tee concrete deck bridge system: Design, fabrication, and full-scale verification.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (1): 04020109. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001652.
Nie, J., and C. S. Cai. 2003. “Steel–concrete composite beams considering shear slip effects.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (4): 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:4(495).
Oguejiofor, E. C., and M. U. Hosain. 1992. “Behaviour of Perfobond rib shear connectors in composite beams: Full-size tests.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 19 (2): 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1139/l92-028.
Oguejiofor, E. C., and M. U. Hosain. 1997. “Numerical analysis of push-out specimens with Perfobond rib connectors.” Comput. Struct. 62 (4): 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00270-2.
Ovuoba, B., and G. S. Prinz. 2018. “Headed shear stud fatigue demands in composite bridge girders having varied stud pitch, girder depth, and span length.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (11): 04018085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001303.
PennDOT (Pennsylvania Department of Transportation). 2014. Standard concrete deck slab design and details for beam bridges. BD-601M. Harrisburg, PA: PennDOT.
PennDOT (Pennsylvania Department of Transportation). 2015. PennDOT design manual. Part 4 DM-4. Harrisburg, PA: PennDOT.
PennDOT (Pennsylvania Department of Transportation). 2016. PennDOT specifications. Publication No. 408/2016 Change 6. Harrisburg, PA: PennDOT.
Roberts, W., and R. Heywood. 1995. “Development and testing of a new shear connector for steel concrete composite bridges.” In Proc., 4th Int. Bridge Engineering Conf., 137–145. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ushijima, Y., T. Hosaka, K. Mitsuki, H. Watanabe, Y. Tachibana, and H. Hiragi. 2001. “An experimental study on shear characteristics of perfobond strip and its rational strength equations.” In Int. Symp. on Connections Between Steel and Concrete, 1066–1075. Paris: RILEM Publications SARL.
Vianna, J. d. C., L. F. Costa-Neves, P. C. G. d. S. Vellasco, and S. A. L. de Andrade. 2008. “Structural behaviour of T-Perfobond shear connectors in composite girders: An experimental approach.” Eng. Struct. 30 (9): 2381–2391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.015.
Yam, L. C. P., and J. C. Chapman. 1968. “The inelastic behaviour of simply supported composite beams of steel and concrete.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 41 (4): 651–683. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1968.7813.
Zellner, W. 1987. “Recent designs of composite bridges and a new type of shear connectors.” In Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete, 240–252. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhang, J., X. Hu, L. Kou, B. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and H. Yu. 2018. “Experimental study of the short-term and long-term behavior of Perfobond connectors.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 150: 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.004.
Ziemian, R. D. 2010. “Appendix B: Technical memoranda of structural stability research council.” In Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures, edited by R. D. Ziemian, 963–1029. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 23, 2020
Accepted: Oct 13, 2020
Published online: Jan 8, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 8, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.