Technical Papers
Dec 10, 2020

Cable Shape and Construction Parameters of Triple-Tower Double-Cable Suspension Bridge with Two Asymmetrical Main Spans

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 2

Abstract

Triple-tower suspension bridges with two asymmetrical main spans can adapt to complicated terrain conditions. If the top and bottom main cables with different sags are used on the two main spans, the longitudinal constraint on the central tower can be significantly improved, which is more conducive to the promotion and application of three-tower suspension bridges. Based on the widely used multisegment catenary theory, this paper proposes an analytical calculation method to determine the main cable shape in three structural states: completed bridge state, under live load action, and free cable state. In the completed bridge state, each span is solved independently, with the longer main span being calculated first. The two main spans and two side spans require an altitude difference closure condition, while the two anchor spans require an altitude difference closure condition and a splay-saddle moment balance condition. Under live load, due to the media effect of tower displacement and splay-saddle rotation, all spans need to be solved simultaneously. In addition to the conditions of altitude difference closure and splay-saddle moment balance, conditions such as span length closure and main cable unstressed length conservation are required. In the free cable state, due to the media effect of the cable saddle preoffset, all spans need to be solved simultaneously. The solution is similar to that under live load, and thus, it only requires minor modifications of the equations corresponding to live load. During the calculation of these main cable shapes, the deformations and internal forces induced by the live load, together with key construction parameters including the unstressed length of the main cable, the saddle preoffset, the elevations of free cable, and the installation positions of cable clamps can also be calculated. The method proposed in this paper is applied to a double-cable suspension bridge spanned as 248 m + 860 m + 1,070 m + 310 m. The cable shape of the completed bridge is determined first. Subsequently, the deformations and internal forces under live load are calculated for two cases: live load covered in the longer main span and live load covered in the shorter main span. Finally, the cable shapes and construction parameters of the two free cable states, that is, the bottom-cable-only state and the double-cable state, are calculated. This example is employed to verify the effectiveness of the approach presented in this paper. Some useful conclusions are also obtained, which lays the foundation for the promotion of this bridge type.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52078134 and 51678148), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20181277), and the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0806009), which are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Cao, H. Y., X. D. Qian, Y. L. Zhou, Z. J. Chen, and H. P. Zhu. 2018. “Feasible range for midtower lateral stiffness in three-tower suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (3): 06017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001196.
Cao, H. Y., Y. L. Zhou, Z. J. Chen, and M. A. Wahab. 2017. “Form-finding analysis of suspension bridges using an explicit iterative approach.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 62 (1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.1.085.
Chai, S. B., R. C. Xiao, and X. N. Li. 2014. “Longitudinal restraint of a double-cable suspension bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (4): 06013002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000528.
Chen, Z. J., H. Y. Cao, and H. P. Zhu. 2013. “An iterative calculation method for suspension bridge's cable system based on exact catenary theory.” Balt. J. Road Bridge Eng. 8 (3): 196–204. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2013.25.
Cheng, J., M. S. Xu, and H. Xu. 2019. “Mechanical performance study and parametric analysis of three-tower four-span suspension bridges with steel truss girders.” Steel Compos. Struct. 32 (2): 189–198.
Daniel, R. A., F. J. Van Dooren, and R. H. De Meijer. 2010. “Comparison of a single and double main span suspension bridge for the western Scheldt crossing.” IABSE Symp. Rep. 97 (35): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.2749/222137810796023980.
Forsberg, T. 2001. “Multi-span suspension bridges.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 1: 67–73.
Fukuda, T. 1976. “Analysis of multi-span suspension bridges.” J. Struct. Div. 13 (9): 63–86.
Gimsing, N. J. 1997. Cable supported bridges: Concept and design. New York: Wiley.
Gwon, S. G., H. Yoo, and D. H. Choi. 2014. “Effects of flexural rigidity of center tower in four-span suspension bridges.” J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 34 (1): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.1.0049.
Ito, M. 2008. “21st century super long span bridges in Japan.” In Documents of China–Japan Workshop on the Technologies of Large Span Bridges. Tongji, Shanghai: Tongji University.
Jung, M. R., D. J. Min, and M. Y. Kim. 2013. “Nonlinear analysis methods based on the unstrained element length for determining initial shaping of suspension bridges under dead loads.” Comput. Struct. 128 (5): 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.06.014.
Jung, M. R., D. J. Min, and M. Y. Kim. 2015. “Simplified analytical method for optimized initial shape analysis of self-anchored suspension bridges and its verification.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2015: 1–14.
Karoumi, R. 1999. “Some modeling aspects in the nonlinear finite element analysis of cable supported bridges.” Comput. Struct. 71 (4): 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00244-2.
Kim, H. K., M. J. Lee, and S. P. Chang. 2002. “Non-linear shape-finding analysis of a self-anchored suspension bridge.” Eng. Struct. 24 (12): 1547–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00097-4.
Kim, K. S., and H. S. Lee. 2001. “Analysis of target configurations under dead loads for cable-supported bridges.” Comput. Struct. 79 (29): 2681–2692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00120-1.
Kim, M. Y., M. R. Jung, and M. M. Attard. 2019. “Unstrained length-based methods determining an optimized initial shape of 3-dimensional self-anchored suspension bridges.” Comput. Struct. 217: 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.008.
Nazir, C. P. 1986. “Multi-span balanced suspension bridge.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (11): 2512–2527. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2512).
Pena, A., M. Valenzuela, M. Marquez, and H. Pinto. 2017. “Minimum geotechnical requirements for traditional and singular bridges foundations design: Chacao suspension bridge.” Rev. Constr. 16 (3): 498–505.
Pizarro, D., M. A. Hube, M. Valenzuela, and M. Márquez. 2015. “Dynamic characteristics of a longitudinally asymmetrical multi-span suspension bridge: The Chacao bridge.” In Proc., IABSE Conf.—Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges. Geneva, Switzerland: Np.
Sun, Y., H. P. Zhu, and D. Xu. 2015. “New method for shape finding of self-anchored suspension bridges with three-dimensionally curved cables.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000642.
Sun, Y., H. P. Zhu, and D. Xu. 2016. “A specific rod model based efficient analysis and design of hanger installation for self-anchored suspension bridges with 3D curved cables.” Eng. Struct. 110: 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.040.
Thai, H. T., and D. H. Choi. 2013. “Advanced analysis of multi-span suspension bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 90: 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.015.
Wang, S. R., Z. X. Zhou, D. Wen, and Y. Y. Huang. 2016a. “New method for calculating the preoffsetting value of the saddle on suspension bridges considering the influence of more parameters.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (12): 06016010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000956.
Wang, X. L., and S. B. Chai. 2018. “Determining the middle tower stiffness value in an in-plane double-cable triple-tower suspension bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (7): 06018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001254.
Wang, X. L., S. B. Chai, and Y. Xu. 2016b. “Deformation characteristics of double-cable multispan suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (4): 06015007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000858.
Wang, X. L., S. B. Chai, and Y. Xu. 2017. “Sliding resistance of main cables in double-cable multispan suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (3): 06016011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001018.
Yoshida, O., M. Okuda, and T. Moriya. 2004. “Structural characteristics and applicability of four-span suspension bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (5): 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:5(453).
Zhang, L. W., R. C. Xiao, Y. Jiang, and S. B. Chai. 2012. “The characteristics of the multi-span suspension bridge with double main cables in the vertical plane.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 42 (3): 291–311. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.3.291.
Zhang, W. M., and Y. J. Ge. 2014. “Flutter mode transition of a double-main-span suspension bridge in full aeroelastic model testing.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (7): 06014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000625.
Zhang, W. M., and Y. J. Ge. 2017. “Wind tunnel investigation on flutter and buffeting of a three-tower suspension bridge.” Wind Struct. 24 (4): 367–384. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.24.4.367
Zhang, W. M., L. Y. Shi, L. Li, and Z. Liu. 2018. “Methods to correct unstrained hanger lengths and cable clamps” installation positions in suspension bridges.” Eng. Struct. 171: 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.039.
Zhang, W. M., C. Y. Yang, G. M. Tian, and Z. Liu. 2020. “Analytical assessment of main cable shape for three-pylon suspension bridge with unequal main-span lengths: Thermal effect consideration.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1): 04019136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001522.
Zhang, W. M., C. Y. Yang, Z. W. Wang, and Z. Liu. 2019. “An analytical algorithm for reasonable central tower stiffness in the three-tower suspension bridge with unequal-length main spans.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109595.
Zhou, Y. F., and S. R. Chen. 2019. “Iterative nonlinear cable shape and force finding technique of suspension bridges using elastic catenary configuration.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (5): 04019031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001598.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 2February 2021

History

Received: Dec 30, 2019
Accepted: Sep 20, 2020
Published online: Dec 10, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 10, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-1121. Email: [email protected]
Chao-yu Yang [email protected]
Master, Dept. of Bridge, Tunnel and Underground Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]
Jia-qi Chang [email protected]
Master Candidate, Dept. of Bridge, Tunnel and Underground Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share