Abstract

Twenty-five years ago, a bridge live-load model was developed along with the calibration of the AASHTO LRFD Specifications. The statistical parameters of truck loads were based on the Ontario, Canada, truck survey performed in the 1970s. The objective of this paper is to review the available weigh-in-motion (WIM) data and update the live-load model accordingly. The considered WIM database includes over 200 million records, from 44 WIM locations around the USA, with about 1–2 million vehicles per year for each location. The actual number of records depends on traffic volume expressed in terms of an average annual daily truck traffic (AADTT) and local conditions, such as type of road, local facilities, seasonal factors. The cumulative distribution functions of load effect are extrapolated to predict the maximum expected live load for extended time periods. The statistical parameters of live load are determined for the static component of the live-load effect for one lane in simple-span bridges based on the actual WIM data. The analysis showed that there is a 15%–20% increase in live load in comparison to Ontario data. An updated design tandem is proposed to adequately represent the traffic load for short simply supported spans.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The present study benefited from the previous research undertaken as part of the SHRP2 R19B and NCHRP 12-83, in particular work done by former doctoral students at the University of Nebraska Drs. Przemyslaw Rakoczy, Marek Kozikowski, and Marta Lutomirska. The authors are grateful for discussions with Drs. John M. Kulicki, (late) Dennis Mertz, Wagdy Wassef, Tom Murphy, and Hani Nassif.

References

AASHTO. 2015. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, customary U.S. units, 7th edition, with 2015 and 2016 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abowd, G. D., A. K. Dey, P. J. Brown, N. Davies, M. Smith, and P. Steggles. 1999. “Comprehensive truck size and weight study.” In Int. Symp. on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, 304–307. Berlin: Springer.
Agarwal, A. C., and M. Wolkowicz. 1976. Ontario commercial vehicle survey. Interim Report. Downsview, ON: Research and Development Branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications.
Anitori, G., J. R. Casas Rius, and M. Ghosn. 2017. “WIM-based live-load model for advanced analysis of simply supported short- and medium-span highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001081.
Bala Sivakumar, P. E. 2011. Recalibration of LRFR live load factors in the AASHTO manual for bridge evaluation. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Cambridge Systematics. 2007. MAG internal truck travel survey and truck model development study. Final Report. Phoenix: Maricopa Association of Governments.
Commernet. 2011. “Code of Federal Regulations.” Code of Federal Regulations & Federal Register. Accessed July 27, 2017. http://federal.elaws.us/cfr/title23.part650.
Eamon, C. D., V. Kamjoo, and K. Shinki. 2016. “Design live-load factor calibration for michigan highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (6): 04016014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000897.
Enright, B., and E. OBrien. 2012. “Monte carlo simulation of extreme traffic loading on short and medium span bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (12): 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.688753.
Fu, G., J. Chi, and Q. Wang. 2019. Illinois-specific live-load factors based on truck data. Research Report. Urbana, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
Ghosn, M., and F. Moses. 1985. “Markov renewal model for maximum bridge loading.” J. Eng. Mech. 111 (9): 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:9(1093).
Ghosn, M., B. Sivakumar, and F. Moses. 2011. Protocols for collecting and using traffic data in bridge design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kulicki, J. M., and D. R. Mertz. 1991. “A New live load model for bridge design.” In Proc., 8th Annual Int. Bridge Conf., 238–246. Pittsburgh, PA: Np.
Kwon, O.-S., E. Kim, and S. Orton. 2011. “Calibration of live-load factor in LRFD bridge design specifications based on state-specific traffic environments.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (6): 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000209.
Kwon, O.-S., E. Kim, S. Orton, H. Salim, and T. Hazlett. 2010. Calibration of the live load factor in LRFD design guidelines. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Dept. of Transportation.
Leahy, C., E. J. OBrien, B. Enright, and D. Hajializadeh. 2015. “Review of HL-93 bridge traffic load model using an extensive WIM database.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (10): 04014115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000729.
Lee, C. E., and N. Souny-Slitine. 1998. Final research findings on traffic-load forecasting using weigh-in-motion data. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Bureau of Engineering Research, Univ. of Texas in Austin.
Nowak, A. S. 1999. Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. NCHRP Rep. No. C12-33 FY ‘88-‘92. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Nowak, A. S., and K. R. Collins. 2012. Reliability of structures. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nowak, A. S., and K. R. Collins. 2013. Reliability of structures. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nowak, A. S., and Y. K. Hong. 1991. “Bridge live-load models.” J. Struct. Eng. 117 (9): 2757–2767. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:9(2757).
Nowak, A. S., and O. Iatsko. 2017a. “Are our bridges safe?” Bridge 48 (2): 26–30.
Nowak, A. S., and O. Iatsko. 2017b. “Revised load and resistance factors for the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications.” PCI J. 66 (3): 46–58.
Nowak, A. S., and N. C. Lind. 1979. “Practical bridge code calibration.” ASHRAE J. 105 (12): 2497–2410.
Nowak, A. S., H. Nassif, and L. DeFrain. 1993. “Effect of truck loads on bridges.” J. Transp. Eng. 119 (6): 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:6(853).
Nowak, A. S., and P. Rakoczy. 2013. “WIM-based live load for bridges.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (3): 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0602-8.
O’Brien, E. J., C. Leahy, B. Enright, and C. C. Caprani. 2016. “Validation of scenario modelling for bridge loading.” Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng. 11 (3): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2016.27.
O’Connor, A., and I. Enevoldsen. 2009. “Probability-based assessment of highway bridges according to the new Danish guideline.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 5 (2): 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470601022955.
Pelphrey, J., C. Higgins, B. Sivakumar, R. L. Groff, B. H. Hartman, J. P. Charbonneau, J. W. Rooper, and B. V. Johnson. 2008. “State-Specific LRFR live load factors using weigh-in-motion data.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (4): 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:4(339).
Perry, E., and S. Ahn. 2018. Developing a regional regulatory approach to truck platooning in the MAASTO region: A literature review of the history, progress, and benefits of truck platooning. Madison, WI: Mid-America Association of State Transportation Officials.
Roberts, J., R. Mihelic, and M. Roeth. 2016. CONFIDENCE REPORT: Two-truck platooning. Washington, DC: North American Council for Freight Efficiency.
Sivakumar, B., and M. Ghosn. 2011. Recalibration of LRFR live load factors in the AASHTO manual for bridge evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP).
Uddin, N., H. Zhao, C. Waldron, L. Dong, A. Greer, and A. L. Birmingham. 2011. Weigh-in-motion (WIM) data for site-specific LRFR bridge load rating. Tuscaloosa, AL: Univ. Transportation Center for Alabama.
van de Lindt, J. W., and G. Fu. 2002. Investigation of the adequacy of current bridge design loads in the state of michigan. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation, Construction and Technology Division.
Zhao, J., H. Tabatabai, and C.-W. Lee. 2009. Statistical analysis of heavy truck loads using wisconsin weigh-in-motion data. Technical Report. Madison, WI: National Center for Freight and Infrastructure Research and Education.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 1January 2021

History

Received: Mar 9, 2020
Accepted: Jul 23, 2020
Published online: Nov 12, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Apr 12, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Fellow, EIT, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849-5337 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-9515. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849-5337. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-3030. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share