Abstract

Wind barriers are nowadays commonly placed on bridges to protect vehicles from adverse cross-wind effects. In addition to this beneficial influence, wind barriers may adversely affect the bridge dynamic stability. This is particularly exhibited for long-span cable-supported bridges. It is therefore the scope of the present study to analyze the effects of wind barriers on aerodynamic and aeroelastic characteristics of bridge-deck sections of long-span cable-supported bridges together with the respective flow characteristics around bridge-deck sections. The focus is on various arrangements of wind barriers, i.e., (1) wind barriers placed at the windward bridge-deck edge only; (2) wind barriers placed at the leeward bridge-deck edge only; and (3) wind barriers placed at both windward and leeward bridge-deck edges. This was carried out experimentally on small-scale models in a boundary layer wind tunnel. Three typical bridge-deck section models were studied, i.e., Great Belt (Denmark), Kao-Pin Hsi (Taiwan), and Golden Gate (United States). The galloping susceptibility of the bridge-deck sections in all arrangements of wind barriers proved to be the same, as is the case for the empty bridge-deck sections without wind barriers; i.e., from this point of view, wind barriers do not adversely bridge dynamic stability. However, in configurations with the windward wind barrier only, as well as both windward and leeward wind barriers, the flutter susceptibility of the bridge-deck sections increases substantially; i.e., the critical flow velocity for the bridge flutter decreased significantly in comparison with the respective empty bridge-deck sections. For the leeward wind barrier only, the flutter susceptibility of the bridge-deck sections did not change and remained the same as it was for the empty bridge-deck sections. The empty bridge-deck sections do not exhibit any significant change concerning their susceptibility to flutter for various turbulence levels of the incoming freestream flow. The flutter susceptibility of cable-supported bridges equipped with wind barriers is lower in more turbulent incoming flows. The bridge decks with wind barriers are more resilient to flutter in more turbulent winds. Shear layers that separate from the top of the wind barrier may have an important role in the self-excited lift force and the pitch moment and, consequently, the dynamic behavior of bridge decks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the joint research efforts and friendship of Sergey Kuznetsov, who recently passed away. During his life, he was active in the fields of environmental aerodynamics and wind engineering. Up to his last moments, he maintained an encouraging attitude toward research, working, and teaching, which enriched the lives of his students, colleagues, and friends. The work was funded by the research Grant No. 19-21817S of the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) and by the RVO 68378297.

References

Adrian, R. J. 1991. “Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23 (1): 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.001401.
Allori, D., G. Bartoli, and C. Mannini. 2013. “Wind tunnel tests on macro-porous structural elements: A scaling procedure.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 123: 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.011.
Argentini, T., S. Omarini, A. Zasso, and M. Petrangeli. 2018. “Aerodynamic tailoring of a bluff deck section subjected to inclined winds due to the complex orography of the construction site.” In Proc., 15th Conf. of the Italian Association for Wind Engineering In-Vento, 49–62. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Avila-Sanchez, S., O. Lopez-Garcia, A. Cuerva, and J. Meseguer. 2016. “Characterisation of cross-flow above a railway bridge equipped with solid windbreaks.” Eng. Struct. 126: 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.035.
Bakis, K. N., D. J. N. Limebeer, M. S. Williams, and J. M. R. Graham. 2016. “Passive aeroelastic control of a suspension bridge during erection.” J. Fluids Struct. 66: 543–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.08.008.
Buljac, A., H. Kozmar, M. Macháček, and S. Pospíšil. 2018. “Self-excited vibrations of a bridge deck with single and double wind barriers.” In Proc., 15th Conf. of the Italian Association for Wind Engineering In-Vento, 124–132. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Buljac, A., H. Kozmar, S. Pospíšil, and M. Macháček. 2017a. “Flutter and galloping of cable-supported bridges with porous wind barriers.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 171: 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.012.
Buljac, A., H. Kozmar, S. Pospíšil, and M. Macháček. 2017b. “Aerodynamic and aeroelastic characteristics of typical bridge decks equipped with wind barriers at the windward bridge-deck edge.” Eng. Struct. 137: 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.055.
Canor, T., L. Caracoglia, and V. Denoël. 2015. “Application of random eigenvalue analysis to assess bridge flutter probability.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 140: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.02.001.
Chen, N., Y. L. Li, B. Wang, Y. Su, and H. Y. Xiang. 2015. “Effects of wind barrier on the safety of vehicles driven on bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 143: 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.021.
Chu, C. R., C. Y. Chang, C. J. Huang, T. R. Wu, C. Y. Wang, and M. Y. Liu. 2013. “Windbreak protection for road vehicles against crosswind.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 116: 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.02.001.
Coleman, S. A., and C. J. Baker. 1994. “An experimental study of the aerodynamic behaviour of high sided lorries in cross winds.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 53 (3): 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90093-0.
Den Hartog, J. P. 1934. “Transmission line vibration due to sleet.” Trans. AIEE 51: 1074–1086. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AIEE.1932.5056223.
Diana, G., F. Resta, and D. Rocchi. 2008. “A new numerical approach to reproduce bridge aerodynamic non-linearities in time domain.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 1871–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.052.
Dorigatti, F., M. Sterling, D. Rocchi, M. Belloli, A. D. Quinn, C. J. Baker, and E. Ozkan. 2012. “Wind tunnel measurements of crosswind loads on high sided vehicles over long span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 107–108: 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.017.
Dyrbye, C., and S. O. Hansen. 1997. Wind loads on structures. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ehsan, F., and R. H. Scanlan. 1990. “Vortex-induced vibrations of flexible bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 116 (6): 1392–1411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:6(1392).
Ge, Y. J., Z. X. Lin, F. C. Cao, J. B. Pang, and H. F. Xiang. 2002. “Investigation and prevention of deck galloping oscillation with computational and experimental techniques.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90 (12–15): 2087–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00326-4.
Han, Y., S. Q. Liu, C. S. Cai, J. R. Zhang, S. R. Chen, and H. X. He. 2015. “The influence of vehicles on the flutter stability of a long-span suspension bridge.” Wind Struct 20 (2): 272–292. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2015.20.2.275.
He, X. H., K. Shi, T. Wu, Y. F. Zou, H. F. Wang, and H. X. Qin. 2016. “Aerodynamic performance of a novel wind barrier for train–bridge system.” Wind Struct. 23 (3): 171–189. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.23.3.171.
He, X. H., L. Zhou, Z. W. Chen, H. Q. Jing, Y. F. Zou, and T. Wu. 2019. “Wind barrier effects on the flow field and aerodynamic forces of a train–bridge system.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F 233 (3): 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409718793220.
Jones, N. P., R. H. Scanlan, P. P. Sarkar, and L. Singh. 1995. “The effect of section model details on aeroelastic parameters.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 54–55: 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00028-C.
Kozmar, H., and Z. Bencetić Klaić. 2012. “Wind effects on man-made structures in a world with a changing climate.” In National security and human health implications of climate change, edited by H. J. S. Fernando, Z. Klaić, and J. L. McCulley, 219–228. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Kozmar, H., L. Procino, A. Borsani, and G. Bartoli. 2012. “Sheltering efficiency of wind barriers on bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 107–108: 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.027.
Kozmar, H., L. Procino, A. Borsani, and G. Bartoli. 2014. “Optimizing height and porosity of roadway wind barriers for viaducts and bridges.” Eng. Struct. 81: 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.029.
Král, R., S. Pospíšil, and J. Náprstek. 2014. “Wind tunnel experiments on unstable self-excited vibration of sectional girders.” J. Fluids Struct. 44: 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.11.002.
Král, R., S. Pospíšil, and J. Náprstek. 2016. “Experimental set-up for advanced aeroelastic tests on sectional models.” Exp. Tech. 40 (1): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-015-0004-6.
Kuznetsov, S., M. Ribičić, S. Pospíšil, M. Plut, A. Trush, and H. Kozmar. 2017. “Flow and turbulence control in a boundary layer wind tunnel using passive hardware devices.” Exp. Tech. 41 (6): 643–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-017-0196-z.
Laima, S., H. Li, W. Chen, and J. Ou. 2018. “Effects of attachments on aerodynamic characteristics and vortex-induced vibration of twin-box girder.” J. Fluids Struct. 77: 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.12.005.
Lam, H. T., H. Katsuchi, and H. Yamada. 2017. “Investigation of turbulence effects on the aeroelastic properties of a truss bridge deck section.” Engineering 3 (6): 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.10.001.
Mannini, C., and G. Bartoli. 2015. “Aerodynamic uncertainty propagation in bridge flutter analysis.” Struct. Saf. 52: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.07.005.
Mannini, C., G. Sbragi, and G. Schewe. 2016. “Analysis of self-excited forces for a box-girder bridge deck through unsteady RANS simulations.” J. Fluids Struct. 63: 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.02.007.
Montoya, M. C., F. Nieto, S. Hernández, I. Kusano, A. J. Álvarez, and J. Á. Jurado. 2018. “CFD-based aeroelastic characterization of streamlined bridge decks cross-sections subject to shape modifications using surrogate models.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 177: 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.014.
Noda, M., H. Utsunomiya, F. Nagao, M. Kanda, and N. Shiraishi. 2003. “Effects of oscillation amplitude on aerodynamic derivatives.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (1–2): 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00338-0.
Pospíšil, S., A. Buljac, H. Kozmar, S. Kuznetsov, M. Macháček, and R. Král. 2016. “Influence of stationary vehicles on bridge aerodynamic and aeroelastic coefficients.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (4): 05016012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001017.
Poulsen, N. K., A. Damsgaard, and T. A. Reinhold. 1992. “Determination of flutter derivatives for the Great Belt Bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 41 (1–3): 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90403-W.
Raggett, J. D. 2013. Wind study Golden Gate Bridge. Technical Rep. San Rafael, CA: Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District.
Reinhold, R. H., M. Brinch, and A. Damsgaard. 1992. “Wind tunnel tests for the Great Belt Link.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, edited by A. Larsen, 255–267. Copenhagen, Denmark: CRC Press.
Sarkar, P. P., N. P. Jones, and R. H. Scanlan. 1994. “Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 120 (8): 1718–1742. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:8(1718).
Scanlan, R. H., and W. H. Lin. 1978. “Effects of turbulence on bridge flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 104: 719–733.
Scanlan, R. H., and J. J. Tomko. 1971. “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 97 (6): 1717–1733.
Seo, D. W., and L. Caracoglia. 2011. “Estimation of torsional-flutter probability in flexible bridges considering randomness in flutter derivatives.” Eng. Struct. 33 (8): 2284–2296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.03.016.
Simiu, E., and R. H. Scanlan. 1996. Wind effects on structures: Fundamentals and applications to design. New York: Wiley.
Telenta, M., J. Duhovnik, F. Kosel, and V. Šajn. 2014. “Numerical and experimental study of the flow through a geometrically accurate porous wind barrier model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 124: 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.11.010.
Theodorsen, T. 1935. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA Technical Rep. No. 496. Langley Field, VA: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Tieleman, H. W. 2003. “Wind tunnel simulation of wind loading on low-rise structures: A review.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (12–15): 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.021.
Willert, C. E., and M. Gharib. 1991. “Digital particle image velocimetry.” Exp. Fluids 10 (4): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190388.
Wu, T., and A. Kareem. 2012. “An overview of vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of bridge decks.” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 6 (4): 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-012-0179-1.
Xu, F. Y., L. D. Zhu, X. M. Ge, and Z. Zhang. 2014. “Some new insights into the identification of bridge deck flutter derivatives.” Eng. Struct. 75: 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.015.
Xu, Y. L. 2013. Wind effects on cable-supported bridges. Singapore: Wiley.
Yang, Y. X., R. Zhou, Y. J. Ge, and L. H. Zhang. 2016. “Experimental studies on VIV performance and countermeasures for twin-box girder bridges with various slot width ratios.” J. Fluids Struct. 66: 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.08.010.
Zanotti, A., and G. Gibertini. 2018. “Experimental assessment of an active L-shaped tab for dynamic stall control.” J. Fluids Struct. 77: 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.11.010.
Zhou, Y. F., and S. R. Chen. 2015. “Fully coupled driving safety analysis of moving traffic on long-span bridges subjected to crosswind.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 143: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.015.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Oct 24, 2019
Accepted: Jun 9, 2020
Published online: Sep 21, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 21, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Engineer, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Univ. of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4731-1661. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Univ. of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-3543. Email: [email protected]
Stanislav Pospíšil, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prosecká 76, 19000 Prague, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]
Michael Macháček [email protected]
Engineer, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prosecká 76, 19000 Prague, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]
Sergey Kuznetsov, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prosecká 76, 19000 Prague, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share