Technical Papers
Apr 17, 2020

Ground Penetrating Radar Data Processing for Concrete Bridge Deck Evaluation

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 7

Abstract

This paper presents ground-coupled ground penetrating radar (GPR) data-processing procedures for concrete bridge deck evaluation. GPR signals are analyzed in the depth range from the concrete surface to top reinforcement mat. Although most ground-coupled GPR analysis methods focus on the attenuation of signals from rebar reflections only, the proposed algorithms extract three types of parameters from GPR scans: Direct coupling amplitude, wave velocity in concrete cover depth, and normalized, depth-corrected GPR signal amplitude from rebar reflections. These parameters provide information about bridge deck deterioration conditions at different depths. First, the signal amplitude of the direct coupling wave on the concrete surface is analyzed over the entire bridge. Second, the wave velocity in cover concrete is obtained through migration of rebar reflections, and then the rebar depth can be calculated. Third, signal attenuation in concrete is calculated from the rebar reflection and further corrected by the rebar depth. In addition, the true time zero for GPR signal analysis is validated by numerical simulation and experimental data. Finally, this algorithm is demonstrated on field testing data, and the final results are presented in the forms of direct coupling wave amplitude, wave velocity, and attenuation maps.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Nebraska Department of Transportation (NDOT). The authors wish to thank staff members at the Department of Transportation for their assistance in this project, including Mark Traynowicz, Fouad Jaber, Jason Volz, and Kent Miller for providing the bridge information and arranging the traffic controls in the field testing. Hongbin Sun’s help in the field testing is also acknowledged.

References

Ahmad, F., M. G. Amin, and G. Mandapati. 2007. “Autofocusing of through-the-wall radar imagery under unknown wall characteristics.” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16 (7): 1785–1795. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2007.899030.
Barnes, C. L., J. -F. Trottier, and D. Forgeron. 2008. “Improved concrete bridge deck evaluation using GPR by accounting for signal depth-amplitude effects.” NDT and E Int. 41 (6): 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.005.
Bi, W., Y. Zhao, C. An, and S. Hu. 2018. “Clutter elimination and random-noise denoising of GPR signals using an SVD method based on the Hankel matrix in the local frequency domain.” Sensors 18 (10): 3422. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103422.
Comite, D., A. Galli, S. E. Lauro, E. Mattei, and E. Pettinelli. 2016. “Analysis of GPR early-time signal features for the evaluation of soil permittivity through numerical and experimental surveys.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 9 (1): 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2466174.
Di Matteo, A., E. Pettinelli, and E. Slob. 2013. “Early-time GPR signal attributes to estimate soil dielectric permittivity: A theoretical study.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 51 (3): 1643–1654. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2206817.
Diamanti, N., and A. P. Annan. 2017. “Air-launched and ground-coupled GPR data.” In Proc., 2017 11th European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation, 1694–1698. New York: IEEE.
Dinh, K., N. Gucunski, and T. H. Duong. 2018a. “An algorithm for automatic localization and detection of rebars from GPR data of concrete bridge decks.” Autom. Constr. 89: 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.017.
Dinh, K., N. Gucunski, and T. H. Duong. 2018b. “Migration-based automated rebar picking for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks with ground penetrating radar.” NDT and E Int. 98: 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.04.009.
Dinh, K., N. Gucunski, J. Kim, and T. H. Duong. 2016. “Understanding depth-amplitude effects in assessment of GPR data from concrete bridge decks.” NDT and E Int. 83: 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.004.
Dinh, K., T. Zayed, S. Moufti, A. Shami, A. Jabri, M. Abouhamad, and T. Dawood. 2015. “Clustering-based threshold model for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks with ground-penetrating radar.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2522 (1): 81–89. https://doi.org/10.3141/2522-08.
GSSI (Geophysical Survey Systems Inc.). 2017. RADAN 7 manual. Nashua, NH: GSSI.
Kaur, P., K. J. Dana, F. A. Romero, and N. Gucunski. 2016. “Automated GPR rebar analysis for robotic bridge deck evaluation.” IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46: 2265–2276. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2015.2474747.
Klysz, G., and J.-P. Balayssac. 2007. “Determination of volumetric water content of concrete using ground-penetrating radar.” Cem. Concr. Res. 37 (8): 1164–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.04.010.
Lai, W. L., T. Kind, and H. Wiggenhauser. 2010. “Detection of accelerated reinforcement corrosion in concrete by ground penetrating radar.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Ground Penetrating Radar, 1–5. New York: IEEE.
Lai, W. L., T. Kind, and H. Wiggenhauser. 2011. “Using ground penetrating radar and time-frequency analysis to characterize construction materials.” NDT and E Int. 44 (1): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.10.002.
Ozdemir, C., S. Demirci, E. Yigit, and B. Yilmaz. 2014. “A review on migration methods in B-scan ground penetrating radar imaging.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2014 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/280738.
Sham, J. F. C., and W. W. L. Lai. 2016. “Development of a new algorithm for accurate estimation of GPR’s wave propagation velocity by common-offset survey method.” NDT and E Int. 83: 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.05.002.
Solimene, R., A. Cuccaro, A. Dell Aversano, I. Catapano, and F. Soldovieri. 2014. “Ground clutter removal in GPR surveys.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 7 (3): 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2287016.
Stolt, R. H. 1978. “Migration by fourier transform.” Geophysics 43 (1): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440826.
Sun, H., S. Pashoutani, and J. Zhu. 2018. “Nondestructive evaluation of concrete bridge decks with automated acoustic scanning system and ground penetrating radar.” Sensors 18 (6): 1955. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061955.
Tarussov, A., M. Vandry, and A. De La Haza. 2013. “Condition assessment of concrete structures using a new analysis method: Ground-penetrating radar computer-assisted visual interpretation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 38: 1246–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.026.
Warren, C., A. Giannopoulos, and I. Giannakis. 2016. “Gprmax: Open source software to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation for ground penetrating radar.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 209: 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.08.020.
Wei, X., and Y. Zhang. 2014. “Autofocusing techniques for GPR data from RC bridge decks.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 7 (12): 4860–4868. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2321710.
Yelf, R. 2004. “Where is true time zero?” In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR 2004, 279–282. Delft, Netherlands: IEEE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: Mar 25, 2019
Accepted: Jan 6, 2020
Published online: Apr 17, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 17, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-5860. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1110 S 67th St., Omaha, NE 68182 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-3430. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share