Abstract
Four variable-depth pier cap beams were constructed and tested. These specimens were designed to have reinforcement details that had similar features to two different types of pier cap beams used in the Champlain Bridge in Montréal, Canada. The objectives were to examine the behavior of variable-depth cap beams at service loading and at failure to analyze the effectiveness of crack control reinforcement and inclined reinforcement, as well as to investigate the influence of added external horizontal post-tensioning. The observed cap beam responses were compared with two prediction models: sectional analyses and nonlinear finite-element analyses. The amount of crack control reinforcement was important in controlling crack widths at the service load level. The inclined shear reinforcement was found to be effective in resisting shear. Horizontal post-tensioning was effective in reducing crack widths and increasing the overall stiffness of the cap beams but did not lead to significant increases in shear strength. Failure shears predicted by the sectional analyses were conservative. Nonlinear finite element analyses gave good predictions of the complete behavior and strength of the cap beams.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Research and Applications Division of the Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated (JCCBI) for funding this research program.
References
AASHTO. 2014. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASTM. 2016. Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM 615/615M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bentz, E. C. 2003. Augustus: Finite element post-processor for VecTor2 and TRIX. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto. Accessed June 3, 2018. https://www.civ.utoronto.ca/vector.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2009. Carbon steel bars for concrete reinforcement. CSA G30.18. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2014a. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-14. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2014b. Test methods and standard practices for concrete. CSA A23.2-14. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
Delcan. 2011. The future of the Champlain Bridge. Contract Rep. No. 61445. Longueuil, QC, Canada: Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated.
JCCBI (Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated). 1960a. Drawings 12942-EE-4A and 12942-EE-5A by L. Warycha and C. Skotecky, consulting engineers. Montreal, QC: JCCBI.
JCCBI (Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated). 1960b. Drawing 12942-L-168 by H. H. L. Pratley. Montreal, QC: JCCBI.
Wong, P. S. 2002. “User facilities for 2D nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25 • Issue 6 • June 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 2, 2019
Accepted: Nov 14, 2019
Published online: Mar 25, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 25, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.