Technical Papers
Oct 31, 2019

Experimental Analysis on Effectiveness of Crash Beams for Impact Attenuation of Overheight Vehicle Collisions on Railroad Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 1

Abstract

Collisions between overheight semitrailer trucks with low-clearance railroad bridges are one of the leading causes for railroad traffic interruptions on bridges in the United States. Current sensing efforts to inform drivers to avoid low-clearance bridges are not effective, and the number of bridge impacts is not decreasing over time. Railroad bridge owners are interested in attenuating the impact by adding crash beams. Furthermore, crash beams can establish safer transportation operations for railroads, roadways, drivers, and pedestrians, especially in congested cities and communities with several transportation modes. Additionally, crash beams can reduce the damage caused by highway strike incidents and can be easily replaced in those low-clearance bridges that are frequently impacted. This paper presents an experimental study for assessing the effectiveness of various crash beams in attenuating the impact consequences of overheight vehicle collisions against railroad bridges. The experimental test setup includes a 1:5 scaled model of a ballast deck through plate girder (TPG) steel bridge. TPG is a common bridge type utilized frequently in the North American rail transportation system, and this study is the first experiment of this size for railroad bridges impact attenuation. The testing setup consists of a pendulum mass impacting the TPG. A realistic collision event is simulated when the steel block attached to the tip of the pendulum swings and hits the bridge girder. The drop height is adjusted to vary the velocity of the collision and the input force to the TPG. Researchers tested three different crash beam configurations under various impact loads to evaluate their ability in attenuating the consequences of collisions compared with a no-crash beam configuration. To achieve this objective, researchers measured total and permanent displacements of the impacted girder, also known as the outside girder, and permanent crash beam displacements. In general, all crash beams attenuate permanent displacements efficiently, which protects the bridge and its ability to carry railroad traffic after impact. This study designs and validates experimentally three different types of crash beams to protect the bridge serviceability and railroad operations after impacts. Further analysis shows that weak crash beams perform better in reducing outside girder permanent displacements for a low-intensity impact compared to strong beams. Conversely, strong crash beams can sustain high-intensity impacts where weak beams are unable to resist. Overall, there is a trade-off between the ability of the crash beam to dissipate impact energy and to sustain impact loads. Thus, engineers should consider the intensity of the expected impact and design crash beams accordingly. In conclusion, this research experimentally quantifies the efficiency of different crash beam configurations, which establishes new methods to inform different designs for the impact attenuation of overheight vehicle–railroad bridge collisions. Future research includes the experimental testing of larger forces and a larger pool of crash beams toward design recommendations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All experimental and analysis data, and code to generate figures for this study are available from the corresponding author by request. Drawings of the prototype bridge are proprietary and confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The financial support of this research was provided by Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (CCEE) at the University of New Mexico; The Transportation Consortium of South-Central States (TRANSET); US Department of Transportation (USDOT), Project No. 17STUNM02; Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Institute of Engineering Mechanics in Chinese (CEA), China (2016A06 and 2017A02); and National Science Foundation of China (51678538). The authors of this paper thank the Canadian National Railway for their critical input during the development of this research, in particular, Sandro Scola. The conclusions of this research solely represent the opinions of the authors.

References

Abendroth, R. E., and F. Fanous. 2003. “Lateral impacts to PC girders in bridges with intermediate diaphragms.” In Proc., 2003 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symp. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Abendroth, R. E., F. S. Fanous, and B. O. Andrawes. 2004. Steel diaphragms in prestressed concrete girder bridges. Ames, IA: Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State Univ.
Agrawal, A. K., X. Xu, and Z. Chen. 2011. Bridge vehicle impact assessment. New York: Univ. Transportation Research Center, New York State Dept. of Transportation.
AREMA (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association). 2010. Vol. 2 of Manual for railway engineering. Lanham, MD: AREMA.
ASTM. 2014. Standard specification for carbon structural steel. ASTM A36/A36M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Buckingham, E. 1914. “On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations.” Phys. Rev. 4 (4): 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.4.345.
Buth, C. E., M. S. Brackin, W. F. Williams, and G. T. Fry. 2011. Collision loads on bridge piers: Phase 2, report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ.
Buth, C. E., W. F. Williams, M. S. Brackin, D. Lord, S. R. Geedipally, and A. Y. Abu-Odeh. 2010. Analysis of large truck collisions with bridge piers: Phase 1, report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ.
CARC-UNM (Center for Advanced Computer Research-University of New Mexico). 2018. “Researchers look for ways to prevent railroad overpass crashes.” Accessed July 26, 2018. http://carc.unm.edu/research/researchers-look-for-ways-to-prevent-railroad-overpass-crashes.html.
Code of China. 2018. Standard for design of steel structure. GB50017-2017. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
El-Tawil, S., E. Severino, and P. Fonseca. 2005. “Vehicle collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (3): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2011. “Our nation’s highways: 2011.” Accessed December 15, 2016. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/pubs/hf/pl11028/onh2011.pdf.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2013. “Federal railroad administration highway-rail grade crossing safety fact sheet.” Accessed January 30, 2018. https://www.fra.dot.gov/Elib/Document/2901.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2016. “Freight rail today.” Accessed December 15, 2016. https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0362.
FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 2018. “Railroad bridge safety.” Accessed January 30, 2018. https://www.aar.org/Pages/Bridges.aspx.
Fu, C., J. Burhouse, and G.-L. Chang. 2004. “Overheight vehicle collisions with highway bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1865 (1): 80–88. https://doi.org/10.3141/1865-12.
GiraffeG4. 2019. “How the GiraffeG4 protects trucks.” Accessed September 29, 2019. https://giraffeg4.com/collections/front-page-collection.
Global GRAB Technologies, Inc. 2019. “Overheight detection and barrier.” Accessed September 29, 2019. https://grabglobal.com/products/access-control/overheight-detection-and-barrier/.
Henn J. 2009. “11 foot 8.” Accessed July 26, 2018. www.11foot8.com.
Horberry, T., M. Halliday, and A. G. Gale. 2002. “Bridge strike reduction: Optimising the design of markings.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 34 (5): 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00055-0.
Jing, Y., Z. J. Ma, and D. B. Clarke. 2016. “Full-scale lateral impact testing of prestressed concrete girder.” Struct. Concr. 17 (6): 947–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500224.
Joy, R., M. C. Jones, D. Otter, and L. Maal. 2013. Characterization of railroad bridge service interruptions. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development.
MDOT (Michigan Department of Transportation). 2002. “The Michigan Department of Transportation estimated that an ITS-based active overheight detection and warning system installed at both approaches to a bridge would cost $110,000.” Accessed January 30, 2018. https://www.itscosts.its.dot.gov/ITS/benecost.nsf/ID/8EC22ABB6993DC2F852573E8006F4504.
Moreu, F., and B. F. Spencer. 2015. Framework for consequence-based management and safety of railroad bridge infrastructure using wireless smart sensors (WSS). Champaign, IL: Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Nguyen, B., and I. Brilakis. 2016. “Understanding the problem of bridge and tunnel strikes caused by over-height vehicles.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14: 3915–3924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.481.
Nguyen, B., I. Brilakis, and P. A. Vela. 2017. “Optimized parameters for over-height vehicle detection under variable weather conditions.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31 (5): 04017039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000685.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. 2005. “F800 single unit truck FEM model for crash simulations with LS-DYNA.” Accessed April 7, 2019. https://thyme.ornl.gov/fhwa/F800WebPage/description/desc2.html.
Ozdagli, A. I., S. Vemuganti, and F. Moreu. 2017. “Impact rating of semi-trailer truck—Railway through plate girder (TPG) bridge collisions.” In Proc., AREMA 2017 Annual Conf. and Exposition. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Qiao, P., M. Yang, A. Mosallam, and G. Song. 2008. An over-height collision protection system of sandwich polymer composites integrated with remote monitoring for concrete bridge girders. Akron, OH: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Akron.
Qiao, P., M. Yang, and A. Mossallam. 2004. “Impact analysis of I-Lam sandwich system for over-height collision protection of highway bridges.” Eng. Struct. 26 (7): 1003–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.004.
Sharma, H., S. Hurlebaus, and P. Gardoni. 2008. “Development of a bridge bumper to protect bridge girders from overheight vehicle impacts.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 23 (6): 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00548.x.
Trigg Industries International. 2019. “Overheight vehicle detection systems, mounts and poles.” Accessed September 29, 2019. https://www.triggindustries.com/overheight-vehicle-detection-systems/systems-mounts-poles.html.
Vemuganti, S., F. Moreu, A. I. Ozdagli, A. Bajrić, B. Liu, K. Troyer, M. R. Brake, and D. Otter. 2017. “Sensing and rating of vehicle—Railroad bridge collision.” In Structural dynamics challenges in next generation aerospace systems, IMAC XXXV. New York: Springer.
Xu, L., X. Lu, H. Guan, and Y. Zhang. 2013. “Finite-element and simplified models for collision simulation between overheight trucks and bridge superstructures.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (11): 1140–1151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000472.
Xu, L., X. Lu, S. T. Smith, and S. T. He. 2012. “Scaled model test for collision between over-height truck and bridge superstructure.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 49 (Nov): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.05.003.
Yang, M., and P. Qiao. 2010. “Analysis of cushion systems for impact protection design of bridges against overheight vehicle collision.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 37 (12): 1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.06.007.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25Issue 1January 2020

History

Received: Jul 31, 2018
Accepted: Jul 16, 2019
Published online: Oct 31, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

A. I. Ozdagli
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico, MSC01 1070, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131.
F. Moreu, M.ASCE
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico, MSC01 1070, 1 Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; Affiliated Assistant Professor, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico, MSC01 1070, 1 Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; Affiliated Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico, MSC01 1070, 1 Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131.
Dan Xu
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China.
Professor, Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share