Recommendations for More Accurate Shear Rating of Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 12
Abstract
A numerical parametric study was conducted with two primary objectives: (1) to investigate the accuracy of existing AASHTO shear distribution factors for prestressed concrete girder bridges in the United States; and (2) to provide recommendations to more accurately rate bridges for shear and permitting. Results from the parametric study indicated that the longitudinal stiffness (girder composite longitudinal moment of inertia divided by cube of span length) to transverse stiffness (transverse deck strip moment of inertia divided by cube of beam spacing) provided an indication of the elastic shear distribution in nonskewed bridges. Shear distributed more broadly to adjacent girders when the ratio of longitudinal to transverse bending stiffness was lower. The stiffness ratio can be used as a screening tool to delineate cases for which AASHTO shear distribution factors are conservative or unconservative relative to results of detailed finite-element or grillage analyses. Because grillage analyses can account for the distribution of shear associated with truck axle position, they can be used to better determine permit truck demand.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Minnesota Prestress Association. The opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.
References
AASHO. 1931. Standard specifications for highway bridges and incidental structures. Washington, DC: AASHO.
AASHTO. 1973. Standard specifications for highway bridges. 11th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 1994. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2002. Standard specifications for highway bridges. 17th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2003. Manual for condition evaluation of bridges. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. The manual for bridge evaluation. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Cross, B., B. Vaughn, N. Panahshahi, D. Petermeier, Y. S. Siow, and T. Domagalski. 2009. “Analytical and experimental investigation of bridge girder shear distribution factors.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (3): 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:3(154).
Densmore, D. 2000. “Load and resistance factor design.” Federal Highway Administration Policy Memorandums, Washington, DC: FHWA. Accessed January 2013. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/062800.cfm.
Dereli, O., C. K. Shield, and C. French. 2010. Discrepancies in shear strength of prestressed beams with different specifications. Rep. No. MN/RC 2010-03. Minneapolis: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, 242.
Dymond, B. Z., C. E. W. French, and C. K. Shield. 2016. Investigation of shear distribution factors in prestressed concrete girder bridges. Rep. No. MN/RC 2016-32. Minneapolis: Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geo-Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, 595.
Dymond, B. Z., C. E. W. French, and C. K. Shield. 2018. “Torsional effects on load tests to quantify shear distribution in prestressed concrete girder bridges.” ACI SP 323–10: Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Behavior through Load Testing-International Perspectives, 10.1–10.18.
Huo, X. S., S. O. Conner, and R. A. Iqbal. 2003. Re-examination of the simplified method (Henry's method) of distribution factors for live load moment and shear. Rep. No. TNSPR-RES 1218. Cookeville, TN: Center for Electric Power, Tennessee Technological Univ., 254.
Huo, X. S., E. P. Wasserman, and R. A. Iqbal. 2005. “Simplified method for calculating lateral distribution factors for live load shear.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (5): 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:5(544).
NBI (National Bridge Inventory). 2019. “Download NBI ASCII files 2005.” Federal Highway Administration. Accessed June 2016. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii2005.cfm.
Nilson, A. H. 1987. Design of prestressed concrete. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Pei, J. S., R. D. Martin, C. J. Sandburg, and T. H.-K. Kang. 2008. Rating precast prestressed concrete bridges for shear. Rep. No. FHWA-OK-08-08. Norman, OK: School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, Univ. of Oklahoma, 118.
Puckett, J. A., D. Mertz, X. S. Huo, M. C. Jablin, M. D. Peavy, and M. D. Patrick. 2007. Simplified live load distribution factor equations. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. 592. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Runzel, B., C. K. Shield, and C. W. French. 2007. Shear capacity of prestressed concrete beams. Rep. No. MN/RC 2007-47. Minneapolis: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, 237.
Suksawang, N., H. Nassif, and D. Su. 2013. “Verification of shear live-load distribution factor equations for I-girder bridges.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (3): 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0607-3.
Tobias, D. H. 2011. “Perspectives on AASHTO load and resistance factor design.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (6): 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000286.
Zheng, L., X. S. Huo, and R. P. Hayworth. 2007. “Comparison of load factor rating (LFR) to load and resistance factor rating (LRFR) of prestressed concrete I-beam bridges.” In Proc., Structures Congress: New horizons and better practices, 1–9. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zokaie, T. 2000. “AASHTO-LRFD live load distribution specifications.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (2): 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:2(131).
Zokaie, T., T. A. Osterkamp, and R. A. Imbsen. 1991a. “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 3rd Transportation Research Record 1290, 119–126. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Zokaie, T., T. A. Osterkamp, and R. A. Imbsen. 1991b. Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Final Rep. 12-26/1, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 15, 2018
Accepted: Jun 19, 2019
Published online: Sep 25, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 25, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.