Technical Papers
Apr 19, 2019

Mixed-Mode Fatigue and Fracture Assessment of a Steel Twin Box-Girder Bridge

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 7

Abstract

Steel twin box-girder bridges are considered an attractive option in most of the world because of their basic design, simple form, and ease of construction. Despite their advantages, they are considered fracture critical, and as such, there is an additional mandate for the in-depth inspection of these bridges. This causes their inspection cost to be approximately two to five times greater than that of bridges with non-fracture-critical members. The required additional inspection in the United States is mainly driven by rare historical events of bridge collapse. In these events, the bridges were, however, not steel twin box-girder bridges. In addition, the mandated additional inspection does not reflect the inherent level of redundancy in most bridges. Therefore, it is important to quantify the potential for fracture and the level of redundancy in steel two-girder bridges to minimize their inspection cost. Recognizing the inherently large scatter in fatigue performance, the evaluation of crack propagation and the potential for fracture should be performed in a probabilistic manner using detailed models that represent accurate behavior of the bridge. In this study, a detailed numerical finite-element model of a steel twin tub-girder bridge was developed, and crack-growth analysis, potential for fracture of its main tubs, and its overall redundancy were evaluated. The crack-growth analysis was performed using multimode elastic fracture mechanics while accounting for uncertainties in the random variables associated with crack propagation and fracture. The results of the crack-growth analysis were utilized to develop fragility functions that specify inspection intervals versus probability of failure, where failure is characterized by dynamic crack growth. The analysis conducted to quantify the potential for fracture shows distinct possible failure modes that vary from brittle fracture to ductile fracture. The extreme loading case shows that the bridge overall is not at risk of collapse. It is important to note that this conclusion cannot be generalized for all tub-girder bridges because the level of redundancy is expected to vary between bridges depending on many factors, such as girder geometries, plate thickness, and fabrication, among others. The presented approach and the results provide a systematic method for evaluating fracture-critical bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Beden, S. M., S. Abdullah, and A. K. A. Mohd Ihsan. 2009. “Review of fatigue crack propagation models for metallic components.” Eur. J. Sci. Res. 28 (3): 364–397.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2015. Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. BS 7910. London: BSI.
Burdekin, F. M., and G. J. Yang. 1997. “Failure assessment diagrams for mixed mode loading and cracked tubular joints.” In Vol. 1 of Advances in Fracture Research: Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Fracture, 27–37. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Cha, H., L. Lyrenmann, R. J. Connor, and A. H. Varma. 2014. “Experimental and numerical evaluation of the postfracture redundancy of a simple span truss bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (11): 04014048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000622.
Conner, R. J., R. Dexter, and H. Mahmoud. 2005. Inspection and management of bridges with fracture-critical details: A synthesis of highway practice. NCHRP Synthesis 354. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Daniels, J. H., W. Kim, and J. L. Wilson. 1989. After-fracture redundancy in steel two-girder bridges. NCHRP Rep. No. 319. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Forman, R. G. 1972. “Study of fatigue crack initiation from flaws using fracture mechanics theory.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 4 (2): 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(72)90048-3.
Hasanaj, A., A. Gjeta, and M. Kullolli. 2014. “Analyzing defects with failure assessment diagrams of gas pipelines.” Int. J. Mech. Aerosp. Ind. Mechatron. Manuf. Eng. 8 (5): 1045–1047.
Idriss, R. L., K. R. White, C. B. Woodward, and D. V. Jauregui. 1995. “Evaluation and testing of a fracture critical bridge.” NDT and E Int. 28 (6): 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8695(95)00044-5.
Irwin, G. R. 1957. “Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate.” J. Applied Mech. 24: 361–364.
Jankowiak, T., and T. Lodygowski. 2005. “Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model.” Found. Civ. Environ. Eng. 6: 53–69.
Liu, G. R. 1997. “A step-by-step method of rule-of-mixture of fiber-and particle-reinforced composite materials.” Compos. Struct. 40 (3–4): 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00033-6.
Mahmoud, H., and G. Riveros. 2014. “Fatigue reliability of a single stiffened ship hull panel.” Eng. Struct. 66: 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.007.
Mahmoud, H., and G. A. Riveros. 2013. Fatigue repair of steel hydraulic structures (SHS) using carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP): Feasibility study. Rep. No. ERDC/ITL TR-13-1. Vicksburg, MI: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Information Technology Laboratory.
Mahmoud, H. N., and P. A. Miller. 2016. “Distortion-induced fatigue crack growth.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (2): 04015041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000793.
McEvily, A. J. 1974. “Phenomenological and microstructural aspects of fatigue.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on the Strength of Metals and Alloys, 204–213. Cambridge, UK: Institute and Iron and Steel Institutes.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 1971. Collapse of U.S. 35 Bridge, Point Pleasant, WV, December 15, 1967. Rep. No. NTSB-HAR-71-1. Washington, DC: NTSB.
Paris, P. C., and F. Erdogan. 1963. “A critical analysis of crack propagation laws.” J. Basic Eng. 85 (4): 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656900.
Radaj, D., and M. Vormwald. 2013. Advanced methods of fatigue assessment. Berlin: Springer.
Ritchie, R. O., F. A. Vormwald, H. Nayeb-Hashemi, and M. A. Ritter. 1982. “Mode III fatigue crack propagation in low alloy steel.” Metallurgical Trans. A 13 (1): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02642420.
Seo, D.-C., and J.-J. Lee. 2002. “Fatigue crack growth behavior of cracked aluminum plate repaired with composite patch.” Compos. Struct. 57 (1–4): 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00095-8.
Sih, G. C. 1973. Handbook of stress-intensity factors. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ., Institute of Fracture and Solid Mechanics.
Sih, G. C. 1975. “A three-dimensional strain energy density factor theory of crack propagation.” In Three-dimensional crack problems, 15–80. Leyden: Noordhoff.
Walker, E. K. 1970. “The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7076-T6 aluminum.” In Effect of environment and complex load history on fatigue life. STP462. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Wang, W., and C.-T. T. Hsu. 1994. “Fatigue crack growth rate of metal by plastic energy damage accumulation theory.” J. Eng. Mech. 120 (4): 776–795. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:4(776).
Wright, W. J. 2002. “Fracture toughness requirements for highway bridges: Past and future trends.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 4 (1): 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.99.
Xiulin, Z., and M. A. Hirt. 1983. “Fatigue crack propagation in steels.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 18 (5): 965–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(83)90070-X.
Yakel, A. J., A. Azizinamini, H. Pham, and D. S. Doust. 2014. Comprehensive evaluation of fracture critical bridges. NDOR Research Project No. SPR-P1(09) P321. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Dept. of Transportation.
Yan, X., S. Du, and Z. Zehua. 1992. “Mixed-mode fatigue crack growth prediction in biaxially stretched sheets.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 43 (3): 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(92)90115-U.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24Issue 7July 2019

History

Received: Feb 26, 2018
Accepted: Jan 14, 2019
Published online: Apr 19, 2019
Published in print: Jul 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 19, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mazin Irfaee [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372. Email: [email protected]
Hussam Mahmoud, M.ASCE [email protected]
George T. Abell Professor in Infrastructure, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share