Abstract

Heavy trucks, such as tractor–semitrailers weighing up to 360 kN, represent a serious collision hazard for unprotected bridge piers. Current specifications recommend designing a bridge pier vulnerable to vehicular impacts for a static force of 2,670 kN applied on the pier at a specified height. However, the impact load delivered by a heavy truck is dynamic and not applied at a single height during the crash process. High-fidelity computational simulation is used to gain insight into how force is delivered to a bridge pier during a crash. The impact force time histories generated during a collision are simplified into a series of triangular pulse functions applied at various heights. Key parameters defining the pulse models are truck weight, approach speed, and pier size. The values of these parameters are derived from numerical regression based on the simulation results. By comparing pier damage modes and deformation profiles, the proposed pulse model is demonstrated to be able to accurately represent the truck impact demands. We have proposed a capacity design philosophy to mitigate the effects of shear failure. We revealed that piers designed according to the proposed philosophy are less likely to fail in shear compared with regular piers. We asserted that together, the simple pulse model and proposed capacity design approach can serve as a basis for future performance-based design provisions for bridge piers subjected to heavy truck impact.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by Federal Highway Administration under contract DTFH61-14-D-00010. This research was also supported, in part, under National Science Foundation Grants CNS-0958379, CNS-0855217, and ACI-1126113 and the City University of New York High Performance Computing Center at the College of Staten Island. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration or the National Science Foundation.

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Agrawal, A. K., S. El-Tawil, R. Cao, X. Xu, X. Chen, and W. Wong, 2018. A performance based approach for loading definition of heavy vehicle impact events. FHWA-HIF-18-062. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
Agrawal, A. K., G. Y. Liu, and S. Alampalli. 2013. “Effects of truck impacts on bridge piers.” Adv. Mater. Res. 639-640: 13–25. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.639-640.13.
Atahan, A. O., G. Bonin, and M. Karacasu. 2007. “Development of a 30,000 kg heavy goods vehicle for LS-DYNA applications.” Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 14 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHVS.2007.011929.
Buth, C. E., M. S. Brackin, W. F. Williams, and G. T. Fry. 2011. Collision loads on bridge piers: Phase 2. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. Rep. FHWA/TX-11/9-4973-2. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Buth, C. E., W. F. Williams, M. S. Brackin, D. Lord, S. R. Geedipally, and A. Y. Abu-Odeh. 2010. Analysis of large truck collisions with bridge piers: Phase 1. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. Rep. FHWA/TX-10/9-4973-1. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019. “Heavy truck collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6): 04019052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001398.
Chen, L., S. El-Tawil, and Y. Xiao. 2016a. “Reduced models for simulating collisions between trucks and bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (6): 04016020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000810.
Chen, L., S. El-Tawil, and Y. Xiao. 2017. “Response spectrum-based method for calculating the reaction force of piers subjected to truck collisions.” Eng. Struct. 150: 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.092.
Chen, L., Y. Xiao, and S. El-Tawil. 2016b. “Impact tests of model RC columns by an equivalent truck frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (5): 04016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001449.
Deng, L., and C. S. Cai. 2010. “Development of dynamic impact factor for performance evaluation of existing multi-girder concrete bridges.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.013.
Deng, L., W. Wang, and Y. Yu. 2016. “State-of-the-art review on the causes and mechanisms of bridge collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000731.
Deng, L., W. Yan, and L. Nie. 2019. “A simple corrosion fatigue design method for bridges considering the coupled corrosion-overloading effect.” Eng. Struct. 178: 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.028.
El-Tawil, S., E. Severino, and P. Fonseca. 2005. “Vehicle collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (3): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345).
Fan, W., X. Xu, Z. Zhang, and X. Shao. 2018. “Performance and sensitivity analysis of UHPFRC-strengthened bridge columns subjected to vehicle collisions.” Eng. Struct. 173: 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.113.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. “FEM models for semitrailer trucks.” Accessed September 15, 2018. https://thyme.ornl.gov/fhwa/tractortrailer.
Hallquist, J. O. 2006. LS-DYNA theory manual, 25–31. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Hiraishi, H. 1983. “Evaluation of shear and flexural deformations of flexural type shear walls.” In Proc., 3rd South Pacific Regional Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 5. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Joshi, A. S., and L. M. Gupta. 2012. “A simulation study on quantifying damage in bridge piers subjected to vehicle collisions.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 4: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6695-4-8.
Liu, B., W. Fan, W. Guo, B. Chen, and R. Liu. 2017. “Experimental investigation and improved FE modeling of axially-loaded circular RC columns under lateral impact loading.” Eng. Struct. 152: 619–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.009.
Liu, G. 2012. “Behavior of bridge piers during vehicular impacts.” Ph.D. thesis, City College of New York.
Miele, C. R., C. Plaxico, D. Stephens, and S. Simunovic, 2010. U26: Enhanced finite element analysis crash model of tractor-trailers (Phase C). Knoxville, TN: National Transportation Research Center.
Sharma, H., P. Gardoni, and S. Hurlebaus. 2014. “Probabilistic demand model and performance-based fragility estimates for RC column subject to vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 74: 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.017.
Sharma, H., S. Hurlebaus, and P. Gardoni. 2012. “Performance-based response evaluation of reinforced concrete columns subject to vehicle impact.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 43: 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.007.
TBI (Tall Buildings Initiative). 2010. Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. Rep. No. 2010/05. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Tall Buildings Initiative.
Vrouwenvelder, T. 2000. “Stochastic modelling of extreme action events in structural engineering.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 15 (1): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00014-4.
Wang, W., L. Deng, and X. Shao. 2016. “Fatigue design of steel bridges considering the effect of dynamic vehicle loading and overloaded trucks.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 04016048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000914.
Xu, X. 2017. “Performance based approach for loading and design of bridge piers impacted by medium weight trucks.” Ph.D. thesis, City College of New York.
Xu, X., R. Cao, S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, and W. Wong. 2019. “Loading definition and design of bridge piers impacted by medium weight trucks.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6): 04019042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001397.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24Issue 7July 2019

History

Received: Aug 11, 2018
Accepted: Dec 17, 2018
Published online: Apr 24, 2019
Published in print: Jul 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 24, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7075-9800. Email: [email protected]
Sherif El-Tawil, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Email: [email protected]
Anil Kumar Agrawal, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-9382. Email: [email protected]
Waider Wong [email protected]
Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD 21201. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share