Precast Beam Bridges with a Buffer–Gap–Elastomeric Bearings System: Uncertainty in Design Parameters and Randomness in Ground Records
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 5
Abstract
The buffer–gap–elastomeric bearings system used in precast girder bridges with relatively short piers is one of the efficient hybrid seismic isolation schemes. However, there are many uncertain environmental, material, and geometric parameters affecting gap size and, hence, the response of the bridge to earthquakes. To investigate, four different configurations of a three-span continuous bridge were designed for a high-seismicity site in Egypt, considering short or tall bridge piers of high or limited ductility. The performance of each bridge configuration was studied using nonlinear dynamic analysis under ground motions selected to be compatible with the site hazard. Two different treatments of parameter uncertainty were used: a mean parameter model, in which uncertainty was essentially disregarded, versus a random parameter model, represented by 60 realizations of each bridge generated via Latin Hypercube Sampling. Different intensity measures were also studied, showing that the geometric mean of multiple spectral ordinates over a period range that encompassed the vibration characteristics of both a closed-gap and open-gap model best satisfied both efficiency and sufficiency requirements. All in all, parameter uncertainty was shown to be an important issue for such bridges, requiring appropriate consideration for accurate assessment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. 2002. Standard specifications for highway bridges. 17th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Akhnoukh, A. 2008. “Development of high performance precast/prestressed bridge girders.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Nebraska–Lincoln.
Amorn, W., C. Y. Tuan, and M. K. Tadros. 2008. “Curved, precast, pretensioned concrete I-girder bridges.” PCI J. 53 (6): 48–66. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11012008.48.66.
Aviram, A., K. R. Mackie, and B. Stojadinovic. 2008. “Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 7 (4): 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1008-3.
Ayoub, E. F., and G. Helmy. 2000. “Modeling of the elastomeric bearings for the seismic analysis of precast girder bridges.” Bridge Eng. Conf. 2: 39–47.
Baker, J. W., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. “A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (10): 1193–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474.
Bandyopadhyay, N., A. Ghoshal, and A. Sengupta. 2010. “Relevance of bearings and expansion joints—Case studies for indeterminate bridges.” In Proc., IABSE-JSCE Joint Conf. on Advances in Bridge Engineering-II, edited by Amin, Okui, and Bhuiyan. Dhaka, Bangladesh: IABSE-JSCE.
Boore, D. M., and G. M. Atkinson. 2008. “Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s.” Earthquake Spectra 24 (1): 99–138. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2830434.
Borzi, B., P. Ceresa, P. Franchin, F. Noto, G. M. Calvi, and P. E. Pinto. 2015. “Seismic vulnerability of the Italian roadway bridge stock.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (4): 2137–2161. https://doi.org/10.1193/070413EQS190M.
Bozorgzadeh, A., S. Megally, J. Restrepo, and S. A. Ashford. 2006. “Capacity evaluation of exterior sacrificial shear keys of bridge abutments.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (5): 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(555).
Caltrans. 2013a. “Bridge memo to designers (20-1).” Seismic design methodology. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Caltrans. 2013b. Seismic design criteria, version 1.7. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Cardone, D., P. Giuseppe, and S. Salvatore. 2011. “A performance-based adaptive methodology for the seismic evaluation of multi-span simply supported deck bridges.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 9 (5): 1463–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9260-8.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). 2004. Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). 2005a. Design of concrete structures. Part 2: Concrete bridges—Design and detailing Rules. EN 1992-2 Eurocode 2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). 2005b. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1 Eurocode 8. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). 2005c. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 2: Bridges. EN 1998-2 Eurocode 8. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cordova, P. P., S. S. F. Mehanny, G. G. Deierlein, and C. A. Cornell. 2001. “Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure.” In Proc., Second US-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, 187–206. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).
Danciu, L., Ö. Kale, and S. Akkar. 2018. “The 2014 earthquake model of the Middle East: Ground motion model and uncertainties.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (8): 3497–3533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9989-1.
DesRoches, R., and S. Muthukumar. 2002. “Effect of pounding and restrainers on seismic response of multi-frame bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (7): 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(860).
Dicleli, M. 2002. “Seismic design of lifeline bridge using hybrid seismic isolation.” J. Bridge Eng. 7 (2): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:2(94).
Dolsek, M. 2009. “Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (6): 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.869.
Ebrahimian, H., F. Jalayer, and G. Manfredi. 2015. “Seismic retrofit decision-making of bridges based on life-cycle cost criteria.” In Proc., 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015), 25–27. Barcelona, Spain: European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences.
Farag, M. M. N. 2013. “Inelastic seismic response of bridges with a buffer-gap-elastomeric bearing system.” M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo Univ.
Farag, M. M. N., S. S. F. Mehanny, and M. M. Bakhoum. 2015. “Establishing optimal gap size for precast beam bridges with a buffer-gap-elastomeric bearings system.” Earthquakes Struct. 9 (1): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.195.
Guirguis, J. E. B., and S. S. F. Mehanny. 2013. “Evaluating code criteria for regular seismic behavior of continuous concrete box girder bridges with unequal height piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (6): 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000383.
Hindi, R., and M. Dicleli. 2006. “Effect of modifying bearing fixities on the seismic response of short- to medium-length bridges with heavy substructures.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2163367.
Imbsen, R. A. 2006. Recommended LRFD guidelines for the seismic design of highway bridges. Prepared as part of NCHRP Project 20-07, Task 193. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Ishac, M. G., and S. S. F. Mehanny. 2017. “Do mixed pier-to-deck connections alleviate irregularity of seismic response of bridges with unequal height piers?” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (1): 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9958-8.
Jayaram, N., T. Lin, and J. W. Baker. 2011. “A computationally efficient ground-motion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (3): 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3608002.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 1997. Manual for seismic design of highway bridges. Tokyo: JRA.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 2002. Seismic design specifications for highway bridges. Tokyo: International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering and JRA.
Kaviani, P., F. Zareian, and E. Taciroglu. 2012. “Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutments.” Eng. Struct. 45: 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.013.
Kazantzi, A. K., and D. Vamvatsikos. 2015. “Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15): 2677–2694. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2603.
Kohrangi, M., P. Bazzurro, D. Vamvatsikos, and A. Spillatura. 2017. “Conditional spectrum-based ground motion record selection using average spectral acceleration.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44: 657–675.
Kohrangi, M., D. Vamvatsikos, and P. Bazzurro, 2018. “Multi-level conditional spectrum-based record selection for IDA.” In Proc., 11th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI).
Konstantinidis, D., J. M. Kelly, and N. Makris. 2009. “Experimental investigation on the seismic response of bridge bearings.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).
Kunde, M. C., and R. S. Jangid. 2006. “Effects of pier and deck flexibility on the seismic response of isolated bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (1): 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:1(109).
Liel, A. B., C. B. Haselton, G. G. Deierlein, and J. W. Baker. 2009. “Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings.” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.002.
Lin, T., C. B. Haselton, and J. W. Baker. 2013. “Conditional spectrum-based ground motion selection. Part I: Hazard consistency for risk-based assessments.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (12): 1847–1865. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2301.
Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2007. “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 357–392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
Maleki, S. 2004. “Effect of side retainers on seismic response of bridges with elastomeric bearings.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (1): 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:1(95).
Manos, G. C., S. A. Mitoulis, and A. G. Sextos. 2011. “Preliminary design of seismically isolated R/C highway overpasses–Features of relevant software and experimental testing of elastomeric bearings.” In Proc., COMPDYN 2011, III ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Corfu, Greece: Thematic Conference of the European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences (ECCOMAS).
McKay, M. D., W. J. Conover, and R. Beckman. 1979. “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics 21 (2): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268522.
Mehanny, S. S. F. 2009. “A broad-range power-law form scalar-based seismic intensity measure.” Eng. Struct. 31 (7): 1354–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.003.
Mitoulis, S. A., and I. A. Tegos. 2010. “Restrain of a seismically isolated bridge by external stoppers.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 8 (4): 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9172-z.
Monzon, E. V., C. Wei, I. G. Buckle, and A. Itani. 2012. “Seismic response of full and hybrid isolated curved bridges structures.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2012. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Omrani, R., B. Mobasher, S. Sheikhakbari, F. Zareian, and E. Taciroglu. 2017. “Variability in the predicted seismic performance of a typical seat-type California bridge due to epistemic uncertainties in its abutment backfill and shear-key models.” Eng. Struct. 148 (1): 718–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.018.
OpenSees 2.0.0. 2008. Computer software and technical manual. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Pagani, M., et al. 2014. “OpenQuake Engine: An open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 85 (3): 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130087.
Pinto, P. E., R. Giannini, and P. Franchin. 2004. Seismic reliability analysis of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
Psycharis, I. N., and G. E. Mageirou. 2003. “Parametric investigation of the inelastic seismic response of bridges with elastomeric bearings combined with stoppers.” In Proc., fib Symp. on Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions. Athens, Greece: Technical Chamber of Greece (TEE-TCG).
Ramanathan, K., R. DesRoches, and J. E. Padgett. 2012. “A comparison of pre- and post-seismic design considerations in moderate seismic zones through the fragility assessment of multi-span bridge classes.” Eng. Struct. 45: 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.004.
Tsai, Y.-T. 2009. “Stopper-bearing system—A solution to displacement control of bridge decks.” M.Sc. thesis, Texas A&M Univ.
Vamvatsikos, D. 2014. “Seismic performance uncertainty estimation via IDA with progressive accelerogram-wise latin hypercube sampling.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4014015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001030.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2005. “Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (13): 1573–1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.496.
Vamvatsikos, D., and M. Fragiadakis. 2010. “Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance uncertainty and sensitivity.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39 (2): 141–163.
Yilmaz, T. 2008. “Seismic response of multi-span highway bridges with two-column reinforcement concrete bents including foundation and column flexibility.” M.Sc. thesis, Middle East Technical Univ.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24 • Issue 5 • May 2019
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 6, 2018
Accepted: Nov 9, 2018
Published online: Mar 8, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 8, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.