Technical Papers
Feb 14, 2019

Concept and Preliminary Analysis of Novel Movable Structural System for Cable-Stayed Footbridge

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 4

Abstract

Movable bridges are interesting and feasible solutions at the crossover point of transportations, providing fascinating landscapes and significant engineering challenges. This paper presents a new structural system applied to a movable cable-stayed footbridge. It is an S-shaped curved bridge suspended by cables, and can be opened with a moving mechanism coupled with the torsional deformation. In this paper, we clarify the mechanical behavior of the structural system through a preliminary analysis. We propose novel concepts of the twistable deck, aiming to improve the dynamic performance of the structural system. We trace the moving process of the structure by decoupling the elastic deformation and the rigid displacement. We confirm the validity and versatility of the proposed structural system through the optimal shapes for the footbridges in different cases with respect to the symmetricity and serviceability. The concept of the movable structural system proposed herein is believed to be feasible for application to the design of movable footbridges based on the preliminary analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 1997. Guide specifications for design of pedestrian bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Adriaenssens, S., P. Block, D. Veenendaal, and C. Williams, eds. 2014. Shell structures for architecture: Form finding and optimization. London: Routledge.
Ario, I., M. Nakazawa, Y. Tanaka, I. Tanikura, and S. Ono. 2013. “Development of a prototype deployable bridge based on origami skill.” Autom. Constr. 32: 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.01.012.
Bahra, A., and I. Firth, 2016. “Copenhagen Inner Harbour Bridge.” In Proc., Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, 19th IABSE Congress, 2359–2365. Stockholm, Sweden: IABSE.
Benjeddou, O., O. Limam, and M. Ben Ouezdou. 2017. “The experimental and the theoretical analysis of the serviceability behavior of a deployable footbridge.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 17 (2): 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2016.10.008.
Billington, D. P. 1985. The tower and the bridge: The new art of structural engineering. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Birnstiel, C. 2008. “Movable bridges.” In ICE manual of bridge engineering, 421–458. London: ICE Publishing.
British Standards Institution. 1999. British standard 5400. Steel, concrete, composite bridges: Specification for loads. London: British Standards Institution.
Catbas, F. N., M. Gul, H. B. Gokce, R. Zaurin, D. M. Frangopol, and K. A. Grimmelsman. 2012. “Critical issues, condition assessment and monitoring of heavy movable structures: Emphasis on movable bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (2): 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.744060.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 1997. Design of timber structures, part 2: Bridges. Eurocode 5. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CJJ69-95. 1995. Technical specifications of urban pedestrian overcrossing and underpass. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Standards Press of China.
de Oliveira, L. L., A. A. Freitas, and R. Tinós. 2018. “Multi-objective genetic algorithms in the study of the genetic code’s adaptability.” Inf. Sci. 425: 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.10.022.
Fenu, L., B. Briseghella, and E. Congiu, 2016. “Curved footbridges supported by a shell obtained as an envelope of thrust-lines.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Arch Bridges, 921–932. Wrocław, Poland: Politechnika Wrocławska.
Fenu, L., B. Briseghella, B., and T. Zordan. 2015. “Curved shell-supported footbridges.” IABSE Symp. Rep.: IABSE Conf., 1–8. Zurich, Switzerland: IABSE.
Franck, L. 2011. “An innovative opening mechanism for a footbridge.” In Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers – Bridge Engineering, 47–62. London: ICE Publishing.
Gokce, H. B., F. N. Catbas, M. Gul, and D. M. Frangopol. 2013. “Structural identification for performance prediction considering uncertainties: Case study of a movable bridge.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (10): 1703–1715. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000601.
Goldberg, D. E., and J. H. Holland. 1988. “Genetic algorithms and machine learning.” Mach. Learn. 3 (2-3): 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022602019183.
Hangai, Y., and M. Wu. 1999. “Analytical method of structural behaviours of a hybrid structure consisting of cables and rigid structures.” Eng. Struct. 21 (8): 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00027-3.
Hernández, S., and A. N. Fontán. 2014. “Movable and launched bridges: recent realizations and improved techniques.” WIT Trans. Built Environ. 136: 245–255. https://doi.org/10.2495/MAR140201.
Holland, J. H. 1992. “Genetic algorithms.” Sci. Am. 267 (1): 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66.
Japanese Society of Steel Construction. 1998. Footbridge design guidelines for pedestrians. [In Japanese.] Tokyo: Japanese Society of Steel Construction.
Kawaguchi, K., Y. Hangai, and K. Miyazaki, 1993. “The dynamic analysis of kinematically indeterminate frameworks.” In Proc., IASS-MSU Symp., 569–576. Istanbul, Turkey: MimarSinan Univ.
Kawaguchi, K., K. Nabana, and Y. Hangai. 1996. “Considerations for folding analysis of frame structures.” WIT Trans. Built Environ. 24: 383–394. https://doi.org/10.2495/MRS960361.
Knippers, J., and J. Schlaich. 2000. “Folding mechanism of the Kiel Hörn Footbridge, Germany.” Struct. Eng. Int. 10 (1): 50–53. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686600780620991.
Koglin, T. L. 2003. Movable bridge engineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Miskiewicz, M., and L. Pyrzowski, 2017. “Load tests of the movable footbridge over the port canal in Ustka.” In Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics), 242–246. Gdansk, Poland: IEEE.
Packman, R. 2005. “The rolling bridge, Paddington Basin.” Struct. Eng. 83 (2): 15–17.
Pisani, M. A., and F. Ballio. 2010. “Feasibility analysis of a movable bridge compensating for clearance deficit during floods.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3338–3343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.007.
Pyrzowski, Ł., M. Miśkiewicz, and J. Chróścielewski. 2017. “The effect of fishing basin construction on the behaviour of a footbridge over the port channel.” Pol. Marit. Res. 24 (S1): 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2017-0037.
Russell, B. R., and A. P. Thrall. 2013. “Portable and rapidly deployable bridges: Historical perspective and recent technology developments.” J. Bridge. Eng. 18 (10): 1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000454.
Sarmiento-Comesías, M., A. M. Ruiz-Teran, and A. C. Aparicio. 2013. “State-of-the-art of spatial arch bridges.” In Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng. 166 (3): 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1680/bren.11.00010.
Schlaich, M. 2015. “Elegant structures.” In Proc., IABSE Symp. Rep., Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 1–7. Zurich, Switzerland: IABSE. https://doi.org/10.2749/222137815815773675.
Schlaich, M., K. Brownlie, J. Conzett, et al. 2005. Guidelines for the design of footbridges. Lausanne. Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL.
Thrall, A. P., S. Adriaenssens, I. Payá Zaforteza, and T. P. Zoli. 2012a. “A linkage-based movable bridge form: Design and optimization.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2012, 391–400. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Thrall, A. P., S. Adriaenssens, I. Payá-Zaforteza, and T. P. Zoli. 2012b. “Linkage-based movable bridges: Design methodology and three novel forms.” Eng. Struct. 37: 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.031.
Thrall, A. P. 2011. “Design and optimization of linkage-based movable bridge forms.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton Univ.
Tilley, D. G., P. S. Keogh, K. Mutch, M. Robotham, P. Curran, and S. Mehrkar-Asl. 2003. “Making the eye blink—Modelling the operation of the Gateshead Millennium Bridge.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 217 (7): 735–758. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440603767764390.
Wallner, M., and M. Pircher. 2007. “Kinematics of movable bridges.” J. Bridge. Eng. 12 (2): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:2(147).
Xiang, P., and A. Nishitani. 2015. “Optimum design of tuned mass damper floor system integrated into bending‐shear type building based on H, H2, and stability maximization criteria.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 22 (6): 919–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1725.
Zhang, P., and J. Feng. 2017. “Initial prestress design and optimization of tensegrity systems based on symmetry and stiffness.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 106-107: 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.030.
Zhang, T., K. Kawaguchi, and M. Wu, 2017. “A novel concept for a cable-stayed movable footbridge.” In Proc., Footbridge 2017 Berlin—Tell A Story, 284–285. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24Issue 4April 2019

History

Received: May 30, 2018
Accepted: Oct 9, 2018
Published online: Feb 14, 2019
Published in print: Apr 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 14, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tianhao Zhang [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd. 1239, Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Ken’ichi Kawaguchi [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Industrial Science, Univ. of Tokyo, Tokyo 1538505, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd. 1239, Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share