Modeling and Detailing Pretensioned Concrete Bridge Girder End Regions Using the Strut-and-Tie Approach
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 3
Abstract
Many research initiatives over the last two decades have had the objective of increasing the available spans of prestressed concrete bridge girders and have resulted in optimized cross-sectional shapes. To achieve these long spans, greater levels of prestress force are required. In addition, sections have been redesigned to increase the eccentricity of the prestress, which involves flattening and widening of the bottom bulb. The greater pretension forces and more slender bulbs have a number of effects at the girder end that affect both the serviceability and the ultimate behavior of the girder. This article identifies some behaviors that are potentially exacerbated when larger prestress forces are introduced and proposes a strut-and-tie modeling approach to better understand and mitigate these effects through improved girder end-region detailing. The utility of the proposed strut-and-tie model is demonstrated in two instances: (1) an investigation of the effects of strand debonding and (2) an investigation of the potential impacts of the larger prestress forces resulting from increasing girder span [specifically by adopting larger-diameter strands of 17.8 mm (0.7 in.)]. In the first instance, the strut-and-tie approach was used to establish guidance for preferred strand and strand debonding patterns. In the second instance, the impact of providing greater prestress forces through the use of larger strands was shown to have little effect on the development of transverse stresses at girder ends. The strut-and-tie approach was also demonstrated to be able to be rapidly applied over a wide range of parameters, allowing trends related to girder geometry, for instance, to be established. Thus, the utility of the strut-and-tie method in general, and the proposed model in particular, is demonstrated to provide a powerful tool for the rational analysis of the complex stress state occurring at the end regions of prestressed concrete bridge girders.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this work was a part of NCHRP Project 12-91, Strand Debonding for Pretensioned Girders (Shahrooz et al. 2017). The authors (Shahrooz, Harries, and Ball) wish to thank the NCHRP Project Panel and the Senior Program Officer, Dr. Waseem Dekelbab, for their project oversight and valuable insight and feedback throughout the project. Work presented in this article by authors Ross and Hamilton was supported by the Florida DOT.
References
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Arab, A. A., S. S. Badie, M. T. Manzarim, B. Khaleghi, S. J. Seguirant, and D. Chapman. 2014. “Analytical investigation and monitoring of end-zone reinforcement of the Alaskan Way viaduct super girders.” PCI J. 59 (2): 109–128. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012014.109.128.
Ball, P. 2018. “The use of 0.7-in. prestressed prestressing strand in various bridge girder types.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Cincinnati.
Castrodale, R. W., A. Lui, and C. D. White. 2002. “Simplified analysis of web splitting in pretensioned concrete girders.” In Proc., PCI /FHWA/National Concrete Bridge Conf. Chicago: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
Collins, M. P., and D. Mitchell. 1991. Prestressed concrete structures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
CPCI (Canadian Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2002. “Record-breaking precast NU girders installed in Alberta.” Accessed February 9, 2017. http://www.cpci.ca/en/about_us/project_month/april_2002/.
Hanna, K. E., G. Morcous, and M. K. Tadros. 2010. Design aids of NU I-girder bridges. Rep. No. P322. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Dept. of Roads.
Lallathin, T. J. 2015. “US 17-92 interchange at SR 436.” Aspire 9 (4): 20–26.
Llanos, G., B. E. Ross, and H. R. Hamilton III. 2009. Shear performance of existing prestressed concrete bridge girders. Rep. No. BD 545-56. Tallahassee, FL: Florida DOT.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2003. Bridge design manual. 2nd ed. Chicago: PCI.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2011. Bridge design manual. 3rd ed. Chicago: PCI.
Ramirez, J. A. 1994. “Strut-tie design of pretensioned members.” ACI Struct. J. 91 (5): 572–578.
Ross, B. E. 2012. “Function and design of confinement reinforcement in pretensioned concrete I-girders.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Florida.
Ross, B. E., H. R. Hamilton, and G. R. Consolazio. 2013. “Design model for confinement reinforcement in pretensioned concrete I-girders.” Transp. Res. 2331 (1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/2331-06.
Schlaich, J., K. Schafer, and M. Jennewein. 1987. “Towards a consistent design of structural concrete.” PCI J. 32 (3): 74–150. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150.
Shahrooz, B. M., R. A. Miller, K. A. Harries, Q. Yu, and H. G. Russell. 2017. Strand debonding for pretensioned girders. NCHRP Rep. No. 849. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Tadros, M. K., S. S. Badie, and C. Y. Tuan. 2010. Evaluation and repair procedures for precast/prestressed concrete girders with longitudinal cracking in the web. NCHRP Rep. No. 654. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Tuan, C. Y., S. A. Yehia, N. Jongpitaksseel, and M. K. Tadros. 2004. “End zone reinforcement for pretensioned concrete girders.” PCI J. 49 (3): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012004.68.82.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 20, 2018
Accepted: Aug 29, 2018
Published online: Dec 19, 2018
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 19, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.