Technical Papers
Aug 2, 2018

Fatigue Crack Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Systems in Fracture Critical Inspection of Steel Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 10

Abstract

Many state agencies are investigating the use of unmanned aerial systems (UASs) for bridge inspections. Some agencies are receiving pressure from consultants and their own administrations to implement UAS inspections with limited knowledge of their efficacy. This paper studies the feasibility of using UASs for fatigue crack detection in bridges with fracture critical members (FCMs) through real-time and postflight visual inspection. The effects of surface illumination on the maximum crack-to-camera (MCC) distance at which a fatigue crack can be detected were investigated in the laboratory. Mock field inspections evaluated the achievable crack-to-platform (ACP) distance in Global Positioning System (GPS)-denied and windy environments to determine whether known cracks can be identified at achievable standoff distances. Finally, two FCM inspections demonstrated the field performance of UASs in identifying fatigue cracks. Results highlight the importance of camera specifications and surface illumination in determining the required standoff distance of crack detection. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the difficulties in obtaining clear images with unstable UASs in GPS-denied or windy environments. Nevertheless, the best performing platform tested in this study exhibited a performance comparable to an average of 30 human inspectors at a fatigue crack identification training structure. The limited results presented here proved the feasibility of using UASs for fatigue crack detection in FCM inspections of steel bridges and highlighted the shortcomings of UASs for this type of hands-on inspection.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their gratitude to Matt Farrar, Alan Buerig, and Don Gorely at ITD for providing the fatigue crack specimen and allowing inspection of the Fall River Bridge; Dr. George Hearn for his valuable review comments; Dr. Robert Conner, Jason Lloyd, Austin Glenn Decker, and Leslie Campbell at Purdue University for facilitating the S-BRITE Center inspection, and for Leslie’s review comments; Dr. Cal Coopmans, Nathan Hoffer, Daniel Robinson, and the other members of AggieAir at USU for their assistance during UAS flights; and Hunter Buxton for serving as the pilot during all inspections. This publication was supported by a subcontract from Rutgers University, Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation (CAIT) National University Transportation Center (UTC), and from the US DOT. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Rutgers University or those of the US DOT–Federal Highway Administration.

References

AASHTO. 2016. Manual for bridge evaluation 2nd edition, 2016 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Adams, S. M., and C. J. Friedland. 2011. “A survey of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usage for imagery collection in disaster research and management.” In Proc., 9th Int. Workshop on Remote Sensing for Disaster Response, 8. California: MCEER Bulletin, Stanford University.
Biezma, M., and F. Schanack. 2007. “Collapse of steel bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 21 (5): 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:5(398).
Brooks, C., R. J. Dobson, D. M. Banach, D. Dean, T. Oommen, R. E. Wolf, and B. Hart. 2015. “Evaluating the use of unmanned aerial vehicles for transportation purposes (No. RC-1616).” Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan Tech Research Institute. Accessed November 7, 2018. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdot/RC1616_Part_A_488515_7.pdf.
Conner, R. J., R. Dexter, and H. Mahmoud. 2005. Inspection and management of bridges with fracture-critical details: A synthesis of highway practice. NCHRP synthesis 354. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Dorafshan, S., C. Coopmans, R. Thomas, and M. Maguire. 2018. “Deep learning neural networks for sUAS-assisted structural inspections: Feasibility and application.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). New York: IEEE.
Dorafshan, S., and M. Maguire. 2017. “Autonomous detection of concrete cracks on bridge decks and fatigue cracks on steel members.” In Proc., Digital Imaging 2017, 33–44. Mashantucket, CT: The American Society for Nondestructive Testing.
Dorafshan, S., and M. Maguire. 2018. “Bridge inspection: Human performance, unmanned aerial systems and automation.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 8 (3): 443–476.
Dorafshan, S., M. Maguire, and M. Chang. 2017a. “Comparing automated image-based crack detection techniques in spatial and frequency domains.” In Proc., 26th ASNT Research Symp. Jacksonville, FL: The American Society for Nondestructive Testing.
Dorafshan, S., M. Maguire, N. Hoffer, and C. Coopmans. 2017b. “Challenges in bridge inspection using small unmanned aerial systems: Results and lessons learned.” In Proc., 2017 Int. Conf. on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 1722–1730. New York: IEEE.
Dorafshan, S., M. Maguire, N. Hoffer, and C. Coopmans. 2017c. Fatigue crack detection using unmanned aerial systems in under-bridge inspections. FHWA-ITD-17-256. Boise ID: Idaho Transportation Dept.
Dorafshan, S., M. Maguire, and X. Qi. 2016. Automatic surface crack detection in concrete structures using OTSU thresholding and morphological operations. UTC Rep. 01-2016. Logan, UT: Utah Transportation Center.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017a. National bridge inspection standards. 23 CFR 650C. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017b. “Tables of frequently requested NBI information.” Accessed January 16, 2018. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.cfm.
Gillins, M. N., D. T. Gillins, and C. Parrish. 2016. “Cost-effective bridge safety inspections using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).” In Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress 2016, edited by C. Y. Chandran and M. I. Holt, 1931–1940. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479742.165.
Hearn, G. 2007. Bridge inspection practices. NCHRP synthesis 375. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Jahanshahi, M. R., J. S. Kelly, S. F. Masri, and G. S. Sukhatme. 2009. “A survey and evaluation of promising approaches for automatic image-based defect detection of bridge structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 5 (6): 455–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470801945930.
Lattanzi, D., and G. Miller. 2015. “3D scene reconstruction for robotic bridge inspection.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (2): 04014041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000229.
Lee, S., and N. Kalos. 2014. “Non-destructive testing methods in the US for bridge inspection and maintenance.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18 (5): 1322–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0633-9.
Lichtenstein, A. 1993. “The silver bridge collapse recounted.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 7 (4): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1993)7:4(249).
Maguire, M., and P. Szary. 2017. Unmanned aerial vehicle augmented bridge inspection feasibility study. CIAT-UTC-NC31. Piscataway, NJ: Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Technology.
Metni, N., and T. Hamel. 2007. “A UAV for bridge inspection: Visual servoing control law with orientation limits.” Autom. Constr. 17 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.12.010.
Morgenthal, G., and N. Hallermann. 2014. “Quality assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based visual inspection of structures.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (3): 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.289.
Mustafah, Y. M., A. W. Azman, and F. Akbar. 2012. “Indoor UAV positioning using stereo vision sensor.” Procedia Eng. 41: 575–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.214.
Oh, J. K., G. Jang, S. Oh, J. H. Lee, B. J. Yi, Y. S. Moon, and Y. Choi. 2009. “Bridge inspection robot system with machine vision.” Autom. Constr. 18 (7): 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.04.003.
Omar, T., and M. L. Nehdi. 2017. “Remote sensing of concrete bridge decks using unmanned aerial vehicle infrared thermography.” Autom. Constr. 83 (Nov): 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.024.
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 2009. Illumination. Standards 29 CFR. Washington, DC: OSHA.
Otero, L. D., N. Gagliardo, D. Dalli, W. H. Huang, and P. Cosentino. 2015. Proof of concept for using unmanned aerial vehicles for high mast pole and bridge inspections. Final Rep. Tallahassee, FL: Florida DOT.
Pham, H., J. Gull, A. Mohammadi, and A. Azizinamini. 2016. Managing Florida’s fracture critical bridges–Phases I & II. BDV29-977-17. Tallahassee, FL: Florida DOT.
Sankarasrinivasan, S., E. Balasubramanian, K. Karthik, U. Chandrasekar, and R. Gupta. 2015. “Health monitoring of civil structures with integrated UAV and image processing system.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 54: 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.058.
Weather Underground. 2017a. “Weather history for Ashton, ID.” Accessed March 22, 2017. https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KIDASHTO8#history/s20170322/e20170322/mdaily.
Wells, J., and B. Lovelace. 2017. Unmanned aircraft system bridge inspection demonstration project: Phase II. MN/RC 2017-18. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota DOT.
Woo, G. C. S., and W. F. Long. 1979. “Recommended light levels for clinical procedures.” Optom. Monthly 70: 722–725.
Yeum, C. M., and S. J. Dyke. 2015. “Vision‐based automated crack detection for bridge inspection.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 30 (10): 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12141.
Zink, J., and B. Lovelace. 2015. Unmanned aerial vehicle bridge inspection demonstration project. MN/RC 2015-40. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota DOT.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23Issue 10October 2018

History

Received: Nov 21, 2017
Accepted: Apr 24, 2018
Published online: Aug 2, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 2, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sattar Dorafshan, S.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84321 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Robert J. Thomas, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84321. Email: [email protected]
Marc Maguire, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84321. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share