Technical Papers
May 10, 2017

Parametric Influence of Bearing Restraint on Nonlinear Flexural Behavior and Ultimate Capacity of Steel Girder Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 7

Abstract

Service lives can be extended for the aging steel girder bridge population, many of which are nominally simply spanning structures, by evaluating structural response and capacity, including system behavior, particularly in the presence of support restraint. Longitudinal shear restraint at steel girder bearings has been observed and documented in numerous studies and bridge tests. The restraint arises from various sources, such as friction restraint at older bearings in good condition, or frozen conditions at bearings with abutment deck joint corrosive deterioration. Longitudinal shear restraint at bearings induces arching action in the superstructure, redistributing and reducing moment demands at midspan. This study analytically investigated composite bridge superstructure system-based flexural behavior, including assessment of load levels to initiate yielding and the sequence of yielding initiations leading to ultimate capacity, considering a range of bearing longitudinal restraint conditions. The computational modeling was validated using two documented ultimate load tests on composite steel girder bridges. Nonlinear load-carrying capacity increased with bearing restraint and was accompanied by decreases in system ductility. Both ultimate load capacity and system ductility were observed to be sensitive to bearing restraint within a narrow range of low support stiffness only, relative to the stiffness required to achieve an effectively pinned response. The yield moment was sensitive to the exact restraint stiffness, but ultimate capacity was relatively insensitive and disproportionately benefitted by even slight support restraint.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported with startup funds provided by the College of Engineering and the Office of Research and Economic Development at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The contents of this paper reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein.

References

AASHTO. (1992). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 15th Ed., Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2013). The manual for bridge evaluation, 2nd Ed., 2011 and 2013 Interim Revisions, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2015). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 7th Ed., 2015 Interim Revisions, Washington, DC.
ANSYS 14.5 [Computer software]. ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
ANSYS, Inc. (2013). Mechanical APDL element reference, Canonsburg, PA.
Bakht, B., and Jaeger, L. G. (1988). “Bearing restraint in slab-on-girder bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 2724–2740.
Bakht, B., and Jaeger, L. G. (1990). “Bridge testing—A surprise every time.” J. Struct. Eng., 1370–1383.
Bakht, B., and Jaeger, L. G. (1992). “Ultimate load test of slab-on-girder bridge.” J. Struct. Eng., 1608–1624.
Barth, K. E., and Wu, H. (2006). “Efficient nonlinear finite element modeling of slab on steel stringer bridges.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 42(14–15), 1304–1313.
Bechtel, A., McConnell, J., and Chajes, M. (2011). “Ultimate capacity destructive testing and finite-element analysis of steel I-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 197–206.
Burdette, E. G., and Goodpasture, D. W. (1971). Full scale bridge testing: An evaluation of bridge design criteria, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Chajes, M. J., Mertz, D. R., and Commander, B. (1997). “Experimental load rating of a posted bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 1–9.
Chung, W., and Sotelino, E. D. (2006). “Three-dimensional finite element modeling of composite girder bridges.” Eng. Struct., 28(1), 63–71.
Ellobody, E. (2014). “Examples of finite element models of steel-concrete composite bridges.” Chapter 7, Finite element analysis and design of steel and steel-concrete composite bridges, 1st Ed., 601–639, Elsevier, Boston.
Eom, J., and Nowak, A. S. (2001). “Live load distribution for steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 489–497.
Fu, K., and Lu, F. (2003). “Nonlinear finite-element analysis for highway bridge superstructures.” J. Bridge Eng., 173–179.
Gheitasi, A., and Harris, D. K. (2015a). “Failure characteristics and ultimate load-carrying capacity of redundant composite steel girder bridges: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng., 1–13.
Gheitasi, A., and Harris, D. K. (2015b). “Overload flexural distribution behavior of composite steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 1–15.
Hall, J. C., and Kostem, C. N. (1981). “Inelastic overload analysis of continuous steel multi-girder highway bridges by the finite element method.” Fritz Engineering Lab Rep. No. 432.6, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA.
Kathol, S., Azizinamini, A., and Luedke, J. (1995). “Strength capacity of steel girder bridges.” Final Rep. RES1(0099) P469, Nebraska Dept. of Roads, Lincoln, NE.
Kim, Y. J., Tanovic, R., and Wight, R. G. (2013). “A parametric study and rating of steel I-girder bridges subjected to military load classification trucks.” Eng. Struct., 56, 709–720.
Lin, J. J., Fafard, M., Beaulieu, D., and Massicotte, B. (1991). “Nonlinear analysis of composite bridges by the finite element method.” Comput. Struct., 40(5), 1151–1167.
McConnell, J., Chajes, M., and Michaud, K. (2015). “Field testing of a decommissioned skew steel Igirder bridge: Analysis of system effects.” J. Struct. Eng., 1–13.
NBI (National Bridge Inventory). (2015). “Deficient bridges by superstructure material: 2015.” 〈https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/no10/strtyp15.cfm〉 (Dec. 31, 2015).
Razaqpur, A. G., and Nofal, M. (1990). “Analytical modeling of nonlinear behavior of composite bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 1715–1733.
Schultz, J. L., Commander, B., Goble, G. G., and Frangopol, D. M. (1995). “Efficient field testing and load rating of short and medium-span bridges.” Struct. Eng. Rev, 7(3), 181–194.
Sebastian, W. M., and McConnel, R. E. (2000). “Nonlinear FE analysis of steel-concrete composite structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 662–674.
Sotelino, E. D., Liu, J., Chung, W., and Phuvoravan, K. (2004). “Simplified load distribution factor for use in LRFD design.” Rep. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/20, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Stallings, J. M., and Yoo, C. H. (1993). “Tests and ratings of short-span steel bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 2150–2168.
Tarhini, K. M., and Frederick, G. R. (1992). “Wheel load distribution in I-girder highway bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 1285–1295.
Von Mises, R. (1913). “Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch deformablen Zustand. Göttin.” Nachr. Math. Phys., 1, 582–592 (in German).
Willam, K. J., and Warnke, E. P. (1974). “Constitutive model for triaxial behavior of concrete.” Concrete structures subjected to triaxial stresses, International Association for Bridges and Structural Engineering, Bergamo, Italy.
Wolanski, A. J. (2004). “Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams using finite element analysis.” Master’s thesis, Marquette Univ., Milwaukee.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22Issue 7July 2017

History

Received: Mar 24, 2016
Accepted: Feb 3, 2017
Published online: May 10, 2017
Published in print: Jul 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 10, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fayaz A. Sofi, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2200 Vine St., 362E Whittier Research Center, Lincoln, NE 68583. E-mail: [email protected]
Joshua S. Steelman, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2200 Vine St., 362P Whittier Research Center, Lincoln, NE 68583 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share