Technical Papers
Oct 14, 2016

Vulnerability Sensitivity of Curved Precast-Concrete I-Girder Bridges with Various Configurations Subjected to Multiple Ground Motions

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 2

Abstract

Curved bridges provide a vital benefit to the nation’s infrastructure system by allowing for accessibility and ease of transition in irregular highway layouts. Curved bridges using straight prestressed concrete I-girders with curved decking can fulfill this need. A number of such bridges have been constructed both in seismically and nonseismically active zones. This paper determines the seismic vulnerability sensitivity of the bridges with vastly different configurations via use of conventional fragility-assessment techniques. Experimental design established a statistical setting using core variables to produce a wide variety of hypothetical bridges to represent both as-built and proposed bridge configurations. Each bridge was designed following the strength and serviceability limit states stipulated by current bridge design specifications. As part of the sensitivity analysis, nonlinear time history analyses (NLTHAs) using numerous synthetic ground motions were performed to establish seismic demands on critical bridge components. Using probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs), component and system-level fragility curves were generated. The resulting fragility data were scrutinized to explore the effects of the different design parameters on seismic vulnerability of the bridges. The results indicate that the shorter-span bridges with a tighter radius of curvature are less sensitive to seismic excitations than those with straighter decking, indicating that a span length-to-radius of curvature ratio (S/R) for both single and multispan bridges is statistically determined to be the most influential parameter.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (2005). A policy on design standards: Interstate system, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
Abdelnaby, A., Raji, F., Yohannes, A., Naimi, A., Mishra, S., and Golias, M. (2014). “Impacts of the 1811–1812 earthquakes on existing transportation networks in Memphis area.” 10th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering (10NCEE), July 21–25, 2014, Anchorage, AK.
AmiriHormozaki, E., Pekcan, G., and Itani, A. (2015). “Analytical fragility functions for horizontally curved steel I-girder highway bridges.” Earthquake Spectra, 31(4), 2235–2254.
Amorn, W., Tuan, C. Y., and Tadros, M. K. (2008). Curved, precast, pretensioned concrete I-girder bridges, Civil Engineering Faculty Publications, Univ. of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, Paper 3.
Billah, A. H. M. M., and Alam, M. S. (2015). “Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: A state of-the-art review.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 11(6), 804–832.
Buckle, I. G. (1994). “The Northridge California earthquake of January 17, 1994: Performance of highway bridges.” NCEER-94-0008, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
CALTRANS. (1995). Seismic analysis of bridge structures. California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187–199.
CSiBridge v16 [Computer software]. Computers and Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA.
CUSEC (Central U.S. Earthquake Consortium). (2000). Earthquake vulnerability of transportation systems in the central United States, Memphis, TN.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2001). “Earthquake risk assessment of building structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 74(3), 251–262.
Engineering Seismology Laboratory. (2005). “ESL home page.” 〈http://civil.eng.buffalo.edu/engseislab/index.htm〉 (Mar. 25, 2014).
Frankel, A., Mueller, C., Barnhard, T., Perkins, D., Leyendecker, E.V., Dickman, N., Hanson, S., and Hopper, M. (1996). “National seismic-hazard maps: Documentation June 1996.” Open-File Report 96-532. U.S. Geological Survey/U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Denver, CO.
Ghosh, J., and Padgett, J. E. (2010). “Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves.” J. Struct. Eng., 1497–1511.
HAZUS. (2003). MH MR4 technical manual: Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model, Dept. of Homeland Security Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, FEMA Mitigation Div., Washington, DC.
Hines, W. W., Montgomery, D. C., Goldsman, D. M., and Borror, C. M. (2003). Probability and statistics in engineering, 4th Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Hwang, H., Liu, J. B., and Chiu, Y.-H. (2000). “Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges.” AEC RR-4, Center for Earthquake Research and Information, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
Jeon, J.-S., Shafieezadeh, A., Lee, D. H., Choi, E., and DesRoches, R. (2015). “Damage assessment of older highway bridges subjected to three-dimensional ground motions: Characterization of shear-axial force interaction on seismic fragilities.” Eng. Struct., 87(15), 47–57.
Karim, K. R., and Yamazaki, F. (2003). “A simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(10), 1603–1626.
MnDOT (Minnesota Dept. of Transportation). (2014). LRFD bridge design manual, Oakdale, MN.
Modjeski and Masters, Inc. (2003). “Comprehensive design example for prestressed concrete (PSC) girder superstructure bridge with commentary.” Task order DTFH61-02-T-63032, Federal Highway Administration, Arlington, VA.
Moehle, J. P. (1994). “Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: Reconnaissance report, volume 1—Highway bridges and traffic management.” Earthquake Spectra, 11(3), 287–372.
Mohseni, M. (2012). “Seismic damage assessment of curved bridges using fragility analysis.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering-CASP11, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nielson, B. (2005). “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Nielson, B., and DesRoches, R. (2006). “Influence of modeling assumptions on the seismic response of multi-span simply supported steel girder bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 28(8), 1083–1092.
Nielson, B., and DesRoches, R. (2007a). “Analytical fragility curves for typical highway bridge classes in the central and southeastern United States.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 615–633.
Nielson, B., and DesRoches, R. (2007b). “Seismic performance assessment of simply supported and continuous multi-span concrete girder highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 2(5), 611–620.
Nielson, B., and DesRoches, R. (2007c). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(6), 823–839.
Padgett, J., and DesRoches, R. (2005). Survey of bridge inspectors for highway bridge damage-functionality relationships, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Padgett, J., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty.” J. Struct. Eng., 1710–1718.
Padgett, J., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(8), 1157–1174.
Pahlavan, H., Zakeri, B., Amir, G. G., and Shaianfar, M. (2015). “Probalistic vulnerability assessment of horizontally curved multiframe RC box girder highway bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04015038.
Papazoglou, J., and Elnashai, A. S. (1996). “Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(10), 1109–1137.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). (2011). Bridge design manual, 3rd Ed., First Release, Chicago.
Ramanathan, K., DesRoches, R., and Padgett, J. E. (2010). “Analytical fragility curves for multi-span continuous steel girder bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Transportation Research Record, 2202, 173–182.
Reza, A. (2012). “Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete continuous span bridges with irregular configuration.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 8(9), 873–889.
SAS Institute Inc. (2000). JMP statistics and graphics guide, version 4.0.3, Cary, NC.
Seo, J. (2013). “Statistical determination of significant curved I-girder bridge seismic response parameters.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib., 12(2), 251–260.
Seo, J., and Linzell, D. G. (2010). “Probabilistic vulnerability scenarios for horizontally curved, steel, I-girder bridges under earthquake loads.” Transportation Research Record, 3(2202), 206–211.
Seo, J., and Linzell, D. (2012). “Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment.” Eng. Struct., 34, 21–32.
Seo, J., and Linzell, D. (2013a). “Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges.” Eng. Struct., 52, 642–653.
Seo, J., and Linzell, D. (2013b). “Nonlinear seismic response and parametric examination of horizontally curved steel bridges using 3D computational models.” J. Bridge Eng., 220–231.
Shinozuka, M., Maria, Q., Kim, H. K., and Kim, S. H. M. (2000). “Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development.” J. Eng. Mech., 1287–1296.
Simpson, T. W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P. N., and Allen, J. K. (1997). On the use of statistics in design and the implications for deterministic computer experiments, Design Theory and Methodology-DTM’97, Sacramento, CA, Paper DETC97/DTM-3881.
Simpson, T. W., Peplinski, J. D., Koch, P. N., and Allen, J. K. (2001). “Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations.” Eng. Comput., 17(2), 129–150.
Tekie, P. B., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2003). “Seismic fragility assessment of concrete gravity dams.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(14), 2221–2240.
Torres, E., Seo, J., and Rogers, L. P. (2016). “Probabilistic structural performance evaluation of concrete slab bridge system subjected to scour and earthquake.” ACI Special Publication, in press.
Wang, Z., Padgett, J. E., and Duenas-Osorio, L. (2013). “Influence of vertical ground motions on the seismic fragility modeling of a bridge-soil-foundation system.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(3), 987–962.
Wu, C. F. J., and Hamada, M. (2000). Experiments—Planning, analysis and parameter design optimization, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
Zakeri, B., Padgett, J. E., and Ghodrati Amiri, G. (2015). “Fragility assessment for seismically retrofitted skewed reinforced concrete box girder bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04014043.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22Issue 2February 2017

History

Received: Dec 8, 2015
Accepted: Jun 16, 2016
Published online: Oct 14, 2016
Published in print: Feb 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Mar 14, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Luke P. Rogers [email protected]
Bridge E.I.T, HDR, 701 Xenia Ave. South, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55416. E-mail: [email protected]
Junwon Seo, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share