Abstract

Panelized bridge systems (e.g., Bailey, Mabey Johnson, Acrow) are intended for girder-type bridges and have been implemented for military, civilian, and disaster relief applications. Design challenges, however, include material efficiency (span squared per number of panels), lateral bracing, and achieving longer spans. These challenges are addressed by investigating the promise of implementing panels in new configurations with longer spans and evaluating bracing strategies. Three new forms (Pratt truss, bowstring truss, and network tied arch) composed of standard length panels, with shapes determined based on geometric considerations and structural performance (resistance to buckling), are presented. A parametric study evaluates lateral bracing strategies for girder-like and column-like configurations. The promise of the new forms, also incorporating the developed bracing strategy, is demonstrated through finite element analyses. Following this investigation using a standard length panel, an optimization procedure for minimum self-weight and maximum structural performance is developed to determine an optimized panel length and form. This paper addresses the design challenges of efficiency, bracing, and span length for panelized bridge systems and indicates future areas for improvement through optimization.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant CMMI-1351272. The support of Program Manager Dr. Kishor Mehta is gratefully acknowledged. No funding was provided by any panelized bridge manufacturers. There is no conflict of interest in this research. The authors thank Skip Wilson of Pioneer Bridges, a Division of Bailey Bridges, Inc., for providing cross-sectional properties for Bailey panels.

References

AASHTO. (2012). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, customary U.S. units, Washington, DC.
Acrow Bridge. (2015). “Acrow bridge.” 〈http://www.acrow.com/〉 (May 26, 2015).
Acrow Corporation of America. (2009). Acrow 700XS panel bridge technical handbook, Acrow Corporation, Parsippany, NJ, 1–67.
Acrow Corporation of America. (2014). “Quincy-Weymouth, Massachusetts Fore River Bridge.” 〈http://acrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Fore-River-Quincy-MA.pdf〉 (Aug. 8, 2014).
Alegria Mira, L., Thrall, A. P., and De Temmerman, N. (2016). “The universal scissor component: Optimization of a reconfigurable component for deployable scissor structures.” Eng. Optim., 48(2), 317–333.
Anonymous. (1954). “Bailey bridging in peacetime.” Engineering, 178(4620), 218–220.
Anonymous. (1958). “Bailey bridge units are versatile tools.” Better Roads, 28(5), 27–28.
Department of the Army. (1986). “Bailey bridge.” Field Manual No. 5-277, Headquarters, Dept. of the Army, Washington, DC.
Harris, R. C. (1952). “Bailey bridge used as falsework for erection of bridge in B.C.” Roads Eng. Constr., 90(10), 107, 148–150.
Hempsall, E., and Digby-Smith, R. (1952). “Bailey bridging of wartime fame has versatile civilian uses.” Roads Eng. Constr., 90(7), 85–89,100.
Joiner, J. H. (2001). One more river to cross: The story of British military bridging, Pen and Sword Books, South Yorkshire, U.K.
King, W. S., Wu, S. M., and Duan, L. (2013). “Laboratory load tests and analysis of bailey bridge segments.” J. Bridge Eng., 957–968.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., and Vecchi, M. P. (1983). “Optimization by simulated annealing.” Science, 220(4598), 671–680.
Kulicki, J. M., and Reiner, B. M. (2011). “Truss bridges.” Structural steel designer’s handbook, R. Brockenbrough and F. Merritt, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mabey. (2015). “Temporary and permanent bridges.” 〈http://www.mabey.com/products-services/permanent-temporary-bridge/〉 (May 26, 2015).
Martínez-Martin, F. J., and Thrall, A. P. (2014). “Honeycomb core sandwich panels for origami-inspired deployable shelters: Multi-objective optimization for minimum weight and maximum energy efficiency.” Eng. Struct., 69(Jun), 158–167.
Medina, J. R. (2001). “Estimation of incident and reflected waves using simulated annealing.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 213–221.
Ohsaki, M., Tagawa, H., and Pan, P. (2009). “Shape optimization of reduced beam section under cyclic loads.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(7), 1511–1519.
Paya, I., Yepes, V., González-Vidosa, F., and Hospitaler, A. (2008). “Multi-objective optimization of concrete frames by simulated annealing.” Computer-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 23(8), 596–610.
Pioneer Bridges, a Division of Bailey Bridges. (2015). “Bailey bridges.” 〈http://www.baileybridge.com/〉 (Feb. 6, 2015).
Quaglia, C. P., Yu, N., Thrall, A. P., and Paolucci, S. (2014). “Balancing energy efficiency and structural performance through multi-objective shape optimization: Casey study of a rapidly deployable origami-inspired shelter.” Energy Build., 82(Oct), 733–745.
Russell, B. R., and Thrall, A. P. (2013). “Portable and rapidly deployable bridges: Historical perspective and recent technology developments.” J. Bridge Eng., 1074–1085.
Russell, B. R., Thrall, A. P., Padula, J. A., and Fowler, J. E. (2014). “Reconceptualization and optimization of a rapidly deployable floating causeway.” J. Bridge Eng., 04013013.
SAP2000 [Computer software]. Computers and Structures, Walnut Creek, CA.
SDR Engineering Consultants. (2005). “Prefabricated steel bridge systems: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) solicitation no. DTFH61-03-R-00113. FHWA.” 〈www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/prefab/psbsreport.pdf〉 (Apr. 6, 2012).
Shea, K., and Smith, I. F. C. (2006). “Improving full-scale transmission tower design through topology and shape optimization.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(5), 781–790.
Suppapitnarm, A., Seffen, K. A., Parks, G. T., and Clarkson, P. J. (2000). “Simulated annealing algorithm for multi-objective optimization.” Eng. Optim., 33(1), 59–85.
Thierry, J. A. (1946). “The Bailey bridge.” Mil. Eng., 38(245), 96–102.
Thrall, A. P., Adriaenssens, S., Paya-Zaforteza, I., and Zoli, T. P. (2012). “Linkage-based movable bridges: Design methodology and three novel forms.” Eng. Struct., 37(Apr), 214–223.
Thrall, A. P., Zhu, M., Guest, J. K., Paya-Zaforteza, I., and Adriaenssens, S. (2014). “Structural optimization of deploying structures composed of linkages.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 04014010.
Tveit, P. (1987). “Considerations for design of network arches.” J. Struct. Eng., 2189–2207.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21Issue 4April 2016

History

Received: Feb 14, 2015
Accepted: Oct 5, 2015
Published online: Jan 8, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 8, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Evan J. Gerbo, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Kinetic Structures Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
Casey M. Casias, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Kinetic Structures Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
Ashley P. Thrall, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Myron and Rosemary Noble Assistant Professor of Structural Engineering, Kinetic Structures Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Theodore P. Zoli, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
National Bridge Chief Engineer, HNTB Corporation, New York, NY 10001. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share