Field Evaluation of Cross-Frame and Girder Live-Load Response in Skewed Steel I-Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 3
Abstract
A better understanding of the relationships among girder stresses, cross-frame design, and skew angle of two steel I-girder bridges, which have moderate and high levels of skew and differing cross-frame designs, was revealed via field testing under various load passes of a weighed load vehicle. Strains were measured at approximately 100 points on the two structures, and the majority of the instrumentation was located on the cross-frames. The data were analyzed in terms of vertical bending, lateral bending, and warping in the girders, and in the magnitudes and distribution of stresses in the cross-frames of the two structures. These metrics were compared between the two bridges and in relation to the assumptions typically used in contemporary bridge analysis. This comparison revealed the following: the magnitudes of lateral stresses were higher than current design guidance suggests in some cases when staggered cross-frames were used; significant magnitudes of warping stresses in the girder webs, which state-of-the-art analysis methods generally fail to consider; and cross-frame stresses that exceeded the values typically considered in design.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was made possible by the financial and logistical support of the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT). These contributions to this research are gratefully acknowledged.
References
Ambrose, K. (2012). “Field measurements and corresponding FEA of cross-frame forces in skewed steel I-girder bridges.” Master’s thesis, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE.
AASHTO. (2014). “Load and resistance factor design specifications,” 7th Ed., Washington, DC.
AASHTO/NSBA (National Steel Bridge Alliance). (2014). “Guidelines for the analysis of steel girder bridges, G13.1.” 2nd Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC, and NSBA, Chicago.
Azizinamini, A., Kathol, S., and Beacham, M. (1995). “Influence of cross-frames on load resisting capacity of steel girder bridges.” Eng. J. AISC, 32(3), 107–116.
Barth, A. S., and Bowman, M. D. (2001). “Fatigue behavior of welded diaphragm-to-beam connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 1145–1152.
STAAD.Pro V8i [Computer software]. SELECT series 4. Bentley Systems, Yorba Linda, CA.
Bishara, A. G., and Elmir, W. E. (1990). “Interaction between cross-frames and girders.” J. Struct. Eng., 1319–1333.
Bowman, M. D., Fu, G., Zhou, Y. E., Connor, R., and Godbole, A. (2012). “Fatigue evaluation of steel bridges.” Rep. No. 721, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
BDI (Bridge Diagnostics, Inc.). (2006). BDI strain transducer ST-350 specifications sheet, Boulder, CO.
Connor, R. J., and Fisher, J. W. (2006). “Identifying effective and ineffective retrofits for distortion fatigue cracking in steel bridges using field instrumentation.” J. Bridge Eng., 745–752.
Abaqus 6.11 [Computer software]. Dassault Systemes, Waltham, MA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2012a). Steel bridge design handbook: Bracing system design, Publication No. FHWA-IF-12-052-Vol. 13, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2012b). Steel bridge design handbook: Design example 2A: Two-span continuous straight composite steel I-girder bridge, Publication No. FHWA-IF-12-052-Vol 21, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Hartman, A., Hassel, H., Adams, C., Bennett, C., Matamoros, A., and Rolfe, S. (2010). “Effects of cross-frame placement and skew on distortion-induced fatigue in steel bridges.” Transportation Research Record, 2200, 62–68.
Hassel, H. L., Bennett, C. R., Matamoros, A. B., and Rolfe, S. T. (2013). “Parametric analysis of cross-frame layout on distortion-induced fatigue in skewed steel bridges.” J Bridge Eng., 601–611.
Keating, P. B., Saindon, K. C., and Wilson, S. D. (1997). “Cross frame diaphragm fatigue and load distribution behavior in steel highway bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA/TX-98/1360-2F, National Technical Information Service, Alexandria, VA.
Krupicka, G., and Poellot, B. (1993). “Nuisance stiffness.” Bridgeline, 4(1), 3.
McConnell, J., Michaud, K., and Chajes, M. (2015). “Field testing of a decommissioned skewed steel I-girder bridge: Analysis of system effects.” J. Struct. Eng., D4014010.
McDonald, G., and Frank, K. (2009). “The fatigue performance of angle cross-frame members in bridges.” Rep. No. FSEL 09-1, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Ferguson Structural Engineering Laboratory, Austin, TX.
Stallings, J., Cousins, T., and Tedesco, J. (1997). “Fatigue of diaphragm-girder connections.” Transportation Research Record, 1594, 34–41.
Tedesco, J. W., Stallings, J. M., and Tow, D. R. (1995). “Finite element method analysis of bridge girder-diaphragm interaction.” Comput Struct., 56(2–3), 461–473.
Wang L., and Helwig T. (2008). “Stability bracing requirements for steel bridge girders with skewed supports.” J. Bridge Eng., 149–157.
Wang, W., Battistini, A., Helwig, T., Engelhardt, M., and Frank, K. (2011). “Staggered bracing in skewed steel bridge.” Proc., Annual Stability Conf. Structural Stability Research Council, Structural Stability Research Council, Rolla, MO, 70–81.
White, D., et al. (2012). “Guidelines for analysis methods and construction engineering of curved and skewed steel girder bridges.” Rep. No. 725, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 8, 2015
Accepted: Aug 20, 2015
Published online: Dec 14, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: May 14, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.