Steel Fender Limitations and Improvements for Bridge Protection in Ship Collisions
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 12
Abstract
Steel fenders are widely used in China to protect newly constructed bridges from collapse when struck by ships. In fact, steel fenders are more commonly used in China than other types of bridge protection systems. However, few studies have been conducted to verify the performance of these fenders in a collision. To begin this study, a conventional steel fender was investigated using high-resolution finite-element (FE) analyses of ship–bridge–fender collisions. The limitations of the conventional fender were clearly demonstrated. In particular, when a bridge equipped with the steel fender was subjected to a high-energy collision with a vessel, the impact forces and dynamic responses were greater than on those with no fender. Thus, the authors propose a novel fender design composed of steel and concrete to overcome the limitations of the conventional steel fender. In the proposed fender, the panel that comes in direct contact with the errant ship is made of reinforced concrete, and the inner steel members are designed to absorb the impact energy. Detailed FE models were generated to evaluate the performance of the new steel–concrete composite fender under ship-impact loading. Numerical results indicate that the protective performance of the proposed fender is superior to the conventional steel fender.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51308202 and 51408208), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant No. 20130161120026), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 14JJ3056), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China. The authors would like to thank Ms. Lissa Gay and Dr. Bo Chen for their constructive suggestions to improve the quality of the article.
References
AASHTO. (2009). Guide specifications and commentary for vessel collision design of highway bridges, AASHTO, Washington, DC.
China Ministry of Communications. (2004). General code for design of highway bridges and culverts (JTG D60-2004), China Communications Press, Beijing.
Consolazio, G. R., and Cowan, D. R. (2003). “Nonlinear analysis of barge crush behavior and its relationship to impact resistant bridge design.” Comput. Struct., 81(8–11), 547–557.
Davidson, M., Consolazio, G., Getter, D., and Shah, F. (2013). “Probability of collapse expression for bridges subject to barge collision.” J. Bridge Eng., 287–296.
Fan, W. (2012). “Dynamic demand of bridge structures and capacity of pile-supported protection structures under vessel impacts.” Ph.D. dissertation, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, China (in Chinese).
Fan, W., and Yuan, W. C. (2014a). “Numerical simulation and analytical modeling of pile-supported structures subjected to ship collisions including soil–structure interaction.” Ocean Eng., 91, 11–27.
Fan, W., and Yuan, W. C. (2014b). “Ship bow force-deformation curves for ship-impact demand of bridges considering effect of pile-cap depth.” Shock Vib., 2014, 1–19.
Fan, W., Yuan, W. C., Yang, Z., and Fan, Q. W. (2011). “Dynamic demand of bridge structure subjected to vessel impact using simplified interaction model.” J. Bridge Eng., 117–126.
Haris, S., and Amdahl, J. (2013). “Analysis of ship–ship collision damage accounting for bow and side deformation interaction.” Mar. Struct., 32, 18–48.
Hogström, P., and Ringsberg, J. W. (2013). “Assessment of the crashworthiness of a selection of innovative ship structures.” Ocean Eng., 59, 58–72.
Jiang, H., and Chorzepa, M. (2015). “Evaluation of a new FRP fender system for bridge pier protection against vessel collision.” J. Bridge Eng., 05014010.
Larsen, O. D. (1993). Ship collision with bridges: The interaction between vessel traffic and bridge structures, International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zürich, Switzerland.
Lee, G.-H., Lee, H.-W., and Yoo, S.-W. (2004). “An analysis of steel fender system for vessel collision.” European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, ECCOMAS 2004, P. Neittaanmäki, T. Rossi, K. Majava and O. Pironnaeu, eds., Jyväskylä, 1–8.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). (2009). LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual version 971, Livermore, CA, USA.
Murray, Y. D., Abu-Odeh, A. Y., and Bligh, R. P. (2007). Evaluation of LS-DYNA concrete material model 159, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Pan, J., Wu, W. G., Wang, D. Y., and Xu, M. C. (2005). “Finite element simulation to the collision between ship and anti-collision equipment.” J. Wuhan Univ. Tech. (Transp. Sci. Eng.), 29(2), 178–181 (in Chinese).
Sha, Y., and Hao, H. (2012). “Nonlinear finite element analysis of barge collision with a single bridge pier.” Eng. Struct., 41, 63–76.
Shoji, K., Takabayashi, T., Mita, S., and Nonomura, C. (2000). “Dynamic characteristics of a new material protective device for ship collision.” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 10(3), 217–221.
Tornqvist, R., and Simonsen, B. C. (2004). “Safety and structural crashworthiness of ship structures; modelling tools and application in design.” Int. Conf. on Collision and Grounding of Ships, Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Izu, Japan.
Wang, L., Yang, L., Huang, D., Zhang, Z., and Chen, G. (2008). “An impact dynamics analysis on a new crashworthy device against ship–bridge collision.” Int. J. Impact Eng., 35(8), 895–904.
Wriggers, P. (2006). Computational contact mechanics, Springer, Berlin.
Wuttrich, R., Wekezer, J., Toth, J., and Yazdani, N. (2001). “Retrofit analysis of bridge fender systems.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 327–333.
Xu, L., Lu, X., Guan, H., and Zhang, Y. (2013). “Finite-element and simplified models for collision simulation between overheight trucks and bridge superstructures.” J. Bridge Eng., 1140–1151.
Yamada, Y., and Pedersen, P. (2008). “A benchmark study of procedures for analysis of axial crushing of bulbous bows.” Mar. Struct., 21(2–3), 257–293.
Yuan, P., and Harik, I. E. (2010). “Equivalent barge and flotilla impact forces on bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng., 523–532.
Yuan, W. C., Fan, W., and Zhen, Y. G. (2009). “Study on the fortification criterion and anti-impact structure design of ship-bridge collision for the 2nd Jiaojiang Bridge and connecting engineering.” State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai, China (in Chinese).
Zheng, W. Y., Yang, L. M., and Dong, X. L. (2012). “Research on impact force of protection device based on the real ship collision experiment.” J. Ningbo Univ., 25(2), 99–102 (in Chinese).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20 • Issue 12 • December 2015
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 24, 2014
Accepted: Feb 4, 2015
Published online: May 13, 2015
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.