Technical Papers
Aug 21, 2014

Probabilistic Approach to Assessing Scoured Bridge Performance and Associated Uncertainties Based on Vibration Measurements

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 6

Abstract

Whereas application of sensors that directly detect bridge scour at the foundation may be hindered because of their installation difficulty and vulnerability to floods, the identified scour rarely has been used to assess the bridge performance. This paper presents a new probabilistic approach to assessing the structural integrity of scoured bridges through Bayesian inference based on vibration measurements. The contributions of this paper include (1) introducing a novel application of Bayesian inference for assessing the structural integrity of scoured bridges; (2) parameterizing bridge scour, environmental variation impacts, and their associated uncertainties; (3) integrating the bridge model with the effective sampling algorithm to derive probability distributions of uncertain scour damage and other system properties; and (4) unifying uncertainties of identified scour and the probability of failure of scoured bridges. The proposed approach is illustrated and examined through a numerical study, and its potential for identifying bridge scour and assessing the scoured bridge’s performance reliability is demonstrated based on vibration measurements with environmental variations. The limitation of the presented study and future research directions are also discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge partial support from the Mississippi DOT through the State Study 229 and from the National Science Foundation under Award No. NSF/DUE-0837395. The authors thank Prof. Jianye Ching from the National Taiwan University for providing the original MATLAB codes of the TMCMC simulation algorithm. Any opinions or conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of these funding agencies.

References

AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
Beck, J. L., and Au, S.-K. (2002). “Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.” J. Eng. Mech., 380–391.
Beck, J. L., and Katafygiotis, L. S. (1998). “Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework.” J. Eng. Mech., 455–461.
Beck, J. L., and Yuen, K.-V. (2004). “Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach.” J. Eng. Mech., 192–203.
Catbas, F. N., Susoy, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2008). “Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: Long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data.” Eng. Struct., 30(9), 2347–2359.
Cheung, S. H., and Beck, J. L. (2010). “Calculation of posterior probabilities for Bayesian model class assessment and averaging from posterior samples based on dynamic system data.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 25(5), 304–321.
Ching, J., and Chen, Y.-C. (2007). “Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging.” J. Eng. Mech., 816–832.
Clinton, J. F., Bradford, S. C., Heaton, T. H., and Favela, J. (2006). “The observed wander of the natural frequencies in a structure.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(1), 237–257.
Deraemaeker, A., Reynders, E., De Roeck, G., and Kullaa, J. (2008). “Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 22(1), 34–56.
DeWolf, J., Bagdasarian, D. A., and O’Leary, P. N. (1992). “Bridge condition assessment using signatures.” Proc., Conf. on Nondestructive Evaluation of Civil Structures and Materials, B. A. Suprenant, J. L. Noland, and M. P. Schuller, eds., Atkinson-Noland & Associates, Boulder, CO, 171–179.
Diamantidis, D., and Bazzurro, P. (2007) “Safety acceptance criteria for existing structures.” Proc., Special Workshop on Risk Acceptance and Risk Communication, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 1–10.
Duckett, W. (2005). “Risk analysis and the acceptable probability of failure.” Struct. Eng., 83(15), 25–26.
Farrar, C. R., et al. (1994). “Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande.” Technical Rep. LA-12767-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2009). “Bridge scour and stream instability countermeasures: Experience, selection, and design guidance.” FHWA-NHI-09-111 HEC-23, Washington, DC.
Fielding, M., Nott, D. J., and Liong, S.-Y. (2011). “Efficient MCMC schemes for computationally expensive posterior distributions.” Technometrics, 53(1), 16–28.
Gardner-Morse, M. G., and Huston, D. R. (1993). “Modal identification of cable-stayed pedestrian bridge.” J. Struct. Eng., 3384–3404.
Gee, K. W. (2003). “Action: Compliance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards; Plan of action for scour critical bridges.” HIBT-20 Memorandum, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Gregory, A. E., Yang, N. C., and Young, R. C. Y. (1985). “Bridge inspection by dynamic loading technique.” Proc., Symp. of ASCE Convention: Structural Safety Studies, J. T. P. Yao, R. Corotis, C. B. Brown, and F. Moses, eds., ASCE, New York, 179–201.
Hsu, K., Moradkhani, H., and Sorooshian, S. (2009). “A sequential Bayesian approach for hydrologic model selection and prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 45(12), 1–15.
Hunt, B. E. (2009). “Monitoring scour critical bridges: A synthesis of highway practice.” NCHRP Synthesis 396, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Jaynes, E. T. (1983). E. T. Jaynes: Papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics, R. D. Rosenkrantz, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Katafygiotis, L. S., and Zuev, K. M. (2007). “Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by adaptive linked importance sampling.” Proc., 1st ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, M. Papadrakakis, D. C. Charmpis, N. D. Lagaros, and Y. Tsompanakis, eds., European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Barcelona, Spain, 1–12.
Kim, J.-T., Yun, C.-B., and Yi, J.-H. (2003). “Temperature effects on frequency-based damage detection in plate-girder bridges.” KSCE J. Civil Eng., 7(6), 725–733.
Limongelli, M. P. (2010). “Frequency response function interpolation for damage detection under changing environment.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 24(8), 2898–2913.
Lin, Y. Q., Ren, W. X., and Fang, S. E. (2011). “Structural damage detection based on stochastic subspace identification and statistical pattern recognition: II. Experimental validation under varying temperature.” Smart Mater. Struct., 20(11), 115010.
Manning, D. G. (1985). “Detecting defects and deterioration in highway structures.” NCHRP Synthesis 20-05, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Manson, G. (2002) “Identifying damage sensitive, environmental insensitive features for damage detection.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. of Identification in Engineering Systems, A. W. Lees, U. Prells, and J. P. Norton, eds., Univ. of Swansea, Swansea, U.K., 187–197.
Mokwa, R. L., and Duncan, J. M. (2001). “Laterally loaded pile groups and p-y multipliers.” Proc., Foundations and Ground Improvement, T. L. Brandon, ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, 728–742.
Muto, M., and Beck, J. L. (2008). “Bayesian updating and model class selection for hysteretic structural models using stochastic simulation.” J. Vib. Control, 14(1–2), 7–34,
Nandan, H., and Singh, M. P. (2011). “A system identification based approach for estimating modal frequencies of bridges under environmental influence.” Proc., 29th IMAC: A Conf. and Exposition on Structural Dynamics: Civil Engineering Topics, T. Proulx, ed., Vol. 4, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 273–284.
Nichols, J. M., Link, W. A., Murphy, K. D., and Olson, C. C. (2010). “A Bayesian approach to identifying structural nonlinearity using free-decay response: Application to damage detection in composites.” J. Sound Vib., 329(15), 2995–3007.
Ntotsios, E., Papadimitriou, C., Panetsos, P., Karaiskos, G., Perros, K., and Perdikaris, P. C. (2009). “Bridge health monitoring system based on vibration measurements.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 7(2), 469–483.
Olson, L. D. (2005). “Dynamic bridge substructure evaluation and monitoring.” FHWA-RD-03-089, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Peeters, B., and De Roeck, G. (2001). “One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge: Environmental effects versus damage events.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(2), 149–171.
Rasmussen, C. E. (2003). “Gaussian processes to speed up hybrid Monte Carlo for expensive Bayesian integrals.” Proc., 7th Valencia Int. Meeting: Bayesian Statistics 7, J. M. Bernaro et al., eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 651–659.
Ren, W. X., Lin, Y. Q., and Fang, S. E. (2011). “Structural damage detection based on stochastic subspace identification and statistical pattern recognition: I. Theory.” Smart Mater. Struct., 20(11), 115009.
Salane, H. J., Baldwin, J. W., Jr., and Duffield, R. C. (1981). “Dynamics approach for monitoring bridge deterioration.” Transportation Research Record 832, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Samizo, M., Watanabe, S., Fuchiwaki, A., and Sugiyama, T. (2007). “Evaluation of the structural integrity of bridge pier foundations using microtremors in flood conditions.” Q. Rep. RTRI, 48(3), 153–157.
SAP2000/Bridge 14 [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Computers and Structures.
Shirole, A. M., and Holt, R. C. (1991). “Planning for a comprehensive bridge safety assurance program.” Transportation Research Record 1290, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Sohn, H. (2007). “Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 365(1851), 539–560.
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (1995). Vision 2000: Performance based seismic engineering of buildings, Sacramento, CA.
Suzuki, O., Masui, Y., Abe, M., Samizo, M., and Shimamura, M. (2008). “Development of multifunction scour monitoring device for railway bridge piers part I: Background and concept.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Scour and Erosion, Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo, 263–266.
Xia, Y., Hao, H., Zanardo, G., and Deeks, A. (2006). “Long term vibration monitoring of an RC slab: Temperature and humidity effect.” Eng. Struct., 28(3), 441–452.
Yan, A. M., Kerschen, G., De Boe, P., and Golinval, J. C. (2005) “Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Proc., 19(4), 847–864.
Yuen, K.-V. (2010). “Recent developments of Bayesian model class selection and applications in civil engineering.” Struct. Saf., 32(5), 338–346.
Yuen, K.-V., and Katafygiotis, L. S. (2001). “Bayesian time–domain approach for model updating using ambient data.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 16(3), 219–231.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20Issue 6June 2015

History

Received: Jul 22, 2013
Accepted: Jul 25, 2014
Published online: Aug 21, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jackson State Univ., Jackson, MS 39217 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Formerly, Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jackson State Univ., Jackson, MS 39217. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share