Cost-Efficient Procurement of Bridge Infrastructures by Incorporating Life-Cycle Cost Analysis with Bridge Management Systems
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 6
Abstract
Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) has recognized potential for rationalizing bridge procurement, but its use in this context is far from systematic. The integration of LCCA findings in decisions is often far from robust. Furthermore, although most bridge management systems (BMSs) include databases of relevant information, agencies do not use them effectively to improve future bridge-investment decisions. This paper introduces a comprehensive approach to help agencies exploit their BMSs to procure the most cost-efficient bridge design through fair design-build (D-B) tendering processes. The approach incorporates use of a novel LCCA technique, LCC added-value analysis, that can be conveniently integrated with public agencies' established procurement procedures and maintains contractors' freedoms in D-B processes. The proposed approach allows bridge procurers to establish monetary LCC-efficient benchmarks and embed them in tender documents as core specifications. Hence the lowest LCC bid, rather than the lowest bid in initial investment terms, can be used as the contract award criterion. The Swedish Transport Administration has recently procured several bridges using the approach, thereby gaining considerable cost savings. A case study provides insights into various aspects of bridges’ LCC and illustrates analytical steps that other agencies could apply in bridge procurement. The study shows that the use of D-B processes, together with the lowest LCC bid as the contract award criterion, afford greater opportunities to consider LCC aspects in bridge procurement, rather than relying on traditional contracts and the lowest-bid criterion.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bakker, J., and Volwerk, J. (2007). “Life-cycle cost tenders for infrastructure projects.” Life-cycle cost and performance of civil infrastructure systems, H. Cho, D. Frangopol, and A. Ang, eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 103–110.
BaTMan 5.3 [Computer software]. Borlänge, Sweden, Trafikverket.
Hawk, H. (2003). “Bridge life-cycle cost analysis.” Transportation Research Record 483, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Helmerich, R., Niederleithinger, E., Streicher, D., Wiggenhauser, H., and Algernon, D. (2008). “Bridge inspection and condition assessment in Europe.” Transportation Research Record 2044, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 31–38.
InfraLCC 1.4 [Computer software]. Stockholm, Sweden, FOLKBRO.
Markow, M., and Hyman, W. (2009). “Bridge management systems for transportation agency decision making.” Transportation Research Record 397, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Mattsson, H., and Sundquist, H. (2007). “The real service life of road bridges.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng., 160(4), 173–179.
Ozbay, K., Jawad, D., and Hussain, S. (2004). “Life-cycle cost analysis—State of the practice versus state of the art.” Transportation Research Record 1864, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 62–70.
Patidar, V., Labi, S., Sinha, K., and Thompson, P. (2007). “Multi-objective optimization for bridge management systems.” Transportation Research Record 590, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Perera, O., Morton, B., and Perfrement, T. (2009). Life cycle costing in sustainable public procurement: A question of value, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Safi, M. (2013). “Life-cycle costing: Applications and implementations in bridge investment and management.” Ph.D. thesis, Division of Structural Engineering and Bridges, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Safi, M., Sundquist, H., Karoumi, R., and Racutanu, G. (2012a). “Development of the Swedish bridge management system by upgrading and expanding the use of LCC.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 9(12), 1240–1250.
Safi, M., Sundquist, H., Karoumi, R., and Racutanu, G. (2012b). “Life-cycle cost analysis applications for bridges and integration with bridge management systems, case study of Swedish Bridge and Tunnel Management System.” Transportation Research Record 2292, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 125–133.
Salokangas, L., ed. (2009). “ETSI Project (Stage 2): Bridge life cycle optimisation.” TKK-R-BE3, Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Helsinki, Finland.
Shirolé, A. (2010). “Bridge management to the year 2020 and beyond.” Transportation Research Record 2202, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 159–164.
Swedish Competition Authority (Konkurrensverket). (2012). The Swedish Public Procurement Act—An introduction, Stockholm, Sweden.
Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket). (1996). “Bridge inspection manual.” SRA publication 1996-036 (E), Borlange, Sweden.
Troive, S. (1998). “Structural LCC design of concrete bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
WebHybris 3.2.1.4 [Computer software]. Stockholm, Sweden, CNet SVENSKA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 22, 2013
Accepted: Jul 2, 2014
Published online: Aug 1, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.