Technical Papers
Feb 20, 2014

Anchorage Capacity of Concrete Bridge Barriers Reinforced with GFRP Bars with Headed Ends

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 9

Abstract

An experimental program was conducted to investigate the application of headed glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) ribbed bars at the barrier wall-deck anchorage. Six full-scale barrier models of 1,200 mm in length were erected and tested under static monotonic loading to determine their ultimate load-carrying capacities and failure modes with respect to the barrier wall-deck anchorage. Four PL-2 barrier specimens were cast: two of them were of tapered face and the other two specimens were of parapet type with constant thickness. Each set had a steel-reinforced specimen as the control model and a GFRP-reinforced specimen. In addition, two PL-3 GFRP-reinforced specimens were erected with different spacing of GFRP bars. Each specimen was loaded laterally until collapse. This paper presents the results from these tests in the form of crack pattern, deflection history, and ultimate load-carrying capacity. Experimental results were compared with the design values specified in the Canadian bridge code for barrier anchorage into the deck slabs, showing a large margin of safety for the proposed GFRP-reinforced barriers. In addition, a parametric study was undertaken using finite-element analysis to investigate the applicability of resultant design loads prescribed by the Canadian bridge code for the design of the barrier wall-deck anchorage. The key parameters considered in this study were deck overhang length and thickness and barrier length. The data generated from this parametric study were used to develop set of empirical expressions for the factored applied moment at the barrier-deck interface, as well as the factored tensile force required to design the deck slab cantilever.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support to this project by Schöck Canada, Inc. (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada). H. Azimi acknowledges the postdoctoral financial support provided from Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies. The continuous support, commitment, and dedication of Mr. Nidal Jaalouk, the senior technical officer at Ryerson University, were an integral part of the experimental work reported in this study.

References

AASHTO. (2009). AASHTO-LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete bridge decks and traffic railings, AASHTO, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012). AASHTO-LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, DC.
Abolghasem, A., Azimi, H., Sennah, K., and Tropynina, E. (2013). “Experimental study on bond behavior of GFRP group Anchorage.” Proc., CSCE Annual Conf., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montreal, 1–10.
Buth, C. E., Williams, W. F., Bligh, R. P., Menges, W. L., and Haug, R. R. (2003). “Performance of the TxDOT T202 (MOD) bridge rail reinforced with fiber reinforced polymer bars.” Rep. No. FHWA/TX-03/0-4138-3, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Charron, J. P., Niamba, E., and Massicotte, B. (2011). “Static and dynamic behavior of high- and ultrahigh-performance fiber-reinforced concrete precast bridge parapets.” J. Bridge Eng., 413–421.
Computers and Structures (2010). Integrated structural analysis and design software, SAP2000, Computers and Structures, Berkeley, CA.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006a). “Canadian highway bridge design code (CHBDC).” CAN/CSA-S6-06, Toronto.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006b). “Commentary on CAN/CSA-S6-06, Canadian highway bridge design code (CHBDC).” CAN/CSA-S6.1-06, Toronto.
El-Gamal, S., Tobbi, H., El-Sayed, A., and Benmokrane, B. (2007). “Impact testing of concrete bridge barriers reinforced with new GFRP bars (types 201 and 301).” Technical Rep., Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 84.
El-Salakawy, E., Benmokrane, B., Masmoudi, R., Brière, F., and Breaumier, E. (2003). “Concrete bridge barriers reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite bars.” ACI Struct. J., 100(6), 815–824.
El-Salakawy, E. F., Masmoudi, R., Benmokrane, B., Briére, F., and Desgagné, G. (2004). “Pendulum impacts into concrete bridge barriers reinforced with GFRP composite bars.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 31(4), 539–552.
ISIS. (2007). “Reinforcing concrete structures with fibre reinforced polymers.” Design manual no. 3, Intelligent sensing for innovative structures (ISIS) Canada Research Network, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Maheu, J., and Bakht, B. (1994). “A new connection between concrete barrier walls and bridge decks.” Proc., 22nd CSCE Annual Conf., Vol. II, Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, Toronto, 224–229.
Matta, F., and Nanni, A. (2009). “Connection of concrete railing post and bridge deck with internal FRP reinforcement.” J. Bridge Eng., 66–76.
Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO). (2008). Structural manual, Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Bridge Office, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Schöck Canada (2013). “Schöck ComBAR technical information.” 〈http://www.schoeck.ca〉 (Jul. 14, 2013).
Sennah, K., Juette, B., Weber, A., and Witt, C. (2011). “Vehicle crash testing of a GFRP-reinforces PL-3 concrete bridge barrier.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Durability & Sustainability of Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites for Construction and Rehabilitation, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 417–424.
Sennah, K., Patel, G., and Kianoush, R. (2008). “Development of precast barrier wall system for bridge decks.” Rep. No. BRO-000, Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Sennah, K., Tropynina, E., and Mahmoud, Z. (2012). “Ultimate load tests on PL-3 bridge barrier reinforced with GFRP bars with ribbed surface and headed ends.” Proc., 3rd Int. Structural Specialty Conf., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1–10.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19Issue 9September 2014

History

Received: Aug 15, 2013
Accepted: Jan 24, 2014
Published online: Feb 20, 2014
Discussion open until: Jul 20, 2014
Published in print: Sep 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hossein Azimi, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Civil Engineering Dept., Ryerson Univ., 350 Victoria, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Khaled Sennah, M.ASCE
Professor and Chair, Civil Engineering Dept., Ryerson Univ., 350 Victoria, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.
Ekaterina Tropynina
Structural Design Engineer, Schoeck Canada, Inc., 305 King St. West, Ste. 1010, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1B9; formerly, Graduate Student, Civil Engineering Dept., Ryerson Univ., 350 Victoria, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.
Sergiy Goremykin
Structural Designer, ULMA Construction Systems Canada, Inc., 44 Simpson Rd., Bolton, ON, Canada L7E 1Y4; formerly, Undergraduate Student, Civil Engineering Dept., Ryerson Univ., 350 Victoria, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.
Stefan Lucic
Structural EIT, Hatch Ltd., 2800 Speakman Dr., Mississauga, ON, Canada L5K 2R7; formerly, Undergraduate Student, Civil Engineering Dept., Ryerson Univ., 350 Victoria, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.
Meimei Lam
Project Designer, Turris Corp., 70 Todd Rd., Georgetown, ON, Canada L7G 4R7; formerly, Undergraduate Student, Civil Engineering Dept., Ryerson Univ., 350 Victoria, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share